У статті досліджено використання висновку експерта в контексті предмету доказування, розглянуті дискусійні питання щодо змісту висновку, зробленого на підставі проведеного дослідження, викладення встановлених фактів та їх професійної оцінки і форми висновку як акту експертного дослідження, що в свою чергу призвело до пропозицій заміни поняття «висновок експерта» на поняття «акт експертизи» чи «акт експертного дослідження».
The article deals with the use of electronic documents as evidence in cases of administrative offenсes. Highlights how to obtain and legalize electronic evidence in antitrust law. A comparison of the legal basis for the use of e-mails as evidence in civil and commercial processes and proceedings in cases of administrative offenсes.
Specialists in industry of communicative linguistics, logic, eristic consider that proof (evidence) as a logical and methodological form of scientific cognition in the broadest sense is the process of establishing objective truth through practical and theoretical actions and tools. In a narrow interpretation, bringing called reasoning that establishes the truth of certain allegations by pointing to other allegations, the truth of which is already proven.
In communicative practice has often faced with a situation, when it is necessary not only to have a clear idea of the true state of affairs, but also it follows objectively to demonstrate, what exactly it is considered to be true, that demonstrate the intellectual possibility to prove opponents or senders the rightness of the position by an argumentation, method of reasoning and communication. To feel themselves secure in such situation, the necessary knowledge of the theory of argumentation – the field of philosophical knowledge.