Use of the expert's conclusion in the context of the subject of proof

The article examines the use of expert conclusion in the context of the subject of evidence,  discusses the content of the conclusion made on the basis of the study, presentation of established  facts and their professional assessment and form of conclusion as an act of expert research, which  in turn led to proposals to replace the concept expert "on the concept of " act of examination "or 

"act of expert research ". 

Electronic documents as evidence in cases on administrative offences

The article deals with the use of electronic documents as evidence in cases of administrative offenсes. Highlights how to obtain and legalize electronic evidence in antitrust law. A comparison of the legal basis for the use of e-mails as evidence in civil and commercial processes and proceedings in cases of administrative offenсes.

Proof (evidence) and refutation as types of argumentation

Specialists in industry of communicative linguistics, logic, eristic consider that proof (evidence) as a logical and methodological form of scientific cognition in the broadest sense is the process of establishing objective truth through practical and theoretical actions and tools. In a narrow interpretation, bringing called reasoning that establishes the truth of certain allegations by pointing to other allegations, the truth of which is already proven.

Argumentation theory: the basic philosophical and legal aspects

In communicative practice has often faced with a situation, when it is necessary not only to have a clear idea of the true state of affairs, but also it follows objectively to demonstrate, what exactly it is considered to be true, that demonstrate the intellectual possibility to prove opponents or senders the rightness of the position by an argumentation, method of reasoning and communication. To feel themselves secure in such situation, the necessary knowledge of the theory of argumentation – the field of philosophical knowledge.