Conceptual Model for Economic Evaluation of Innovative Technologies

2017;
: 45-58
1
Lviv Politechnic National University
2
Lviv Politechnic National University
3
Lviv Politechnic National University

The conceptual model for economic evaluation of innovative technologies that focuses on the consumer value thereof has been developed. Contemporary role and significance of the value that is laid in the technology and is a condition for their innovativeness have been substantiated, a set of tools for practical implementation of the proposed model established. The model enables evaluators to take into consideration the parameters of the impact of technology due to current market phenomena and trends, which helps to make better management decisions on the strategy for development of innovative technologies.

1.Arabian, K. (2010). Metodika otcenki intellektualnykh aktivov [Methodology of valuation of intellectual assets]: Moscow: IuNITI-DANA [in Russian].
2.Butnik-Siverskyi, S. F., Orliuk, O. P. at all. (2006). Ekonomiko-pravovi problemy v sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Economic and legal issues of intellectual property]. Kyiv: NDI intelektualnoi vlasnosti APrN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
3.Vasylenko, V. M. Pidkhody i metody otsinky intelektualnoho kapitalu: teoretychnyi aspect [Approaches and Methods of Valuation of the Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Aspect]. Visnyk
4.Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky – Bulletin of Pryazovskyi State Technical University. Series: Economic Sciences, 8, 134-138 [in Ukrainian].
5.Vodyanko, K. Ya. Zasady formuvannia vymiriuvalnoi systemy efektyvnosti innovatsiinoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Fundamentals of formation of enterprise innovation activity efficiency measuring system]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho lisotekhnichnoho universytetu: zbirnyk naukovo-tekhnichnykh prats – Scientific Bulletin of the National Forestry University: Collection of Scientific and Technological Works, 20.1, 280-287 [in Ukrainian].
6.Dobija, M., Barburski, J. at all. (2012). Chelovecheskii kapital v ekonomicheskoi perspective [Economic aspect of the human capital]. Kyiv: Kondor-Izdatelstvo [in Russian].
7.Yemelianov, O. Yu., Petrushka, T. O. & Kret, I. Z. Metodychni zasady otsiniuvannia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti vprovadzhennia resursozberihaiuchykh tekhnolohii na promyslovykh pidpryiemstvakh [Methodological fundamentals of assessment of economic efficiency of introduction of resource-saving technologies at industrial enterprises]. Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia – Issues of economy and management, 754, 18-25. [in Ukrainian].
8.Kislenko, O. V. (Eds.). (2017). Zdiisnennia naukovykh doslidzhen i rozrobok v Ukraini. Dopovid [Researches and design in Ukraine. Report]. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
9.Illiashenko, S. M. Metodolohichni zasady udoskonalennia systemy upravlinnia znanniamy hospodariuiuchykh sub'iektiv [Methodological fundamentals of improvement of the knowledge management system for business entities]. Tezy dopovidei ХXV mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii MicroCAD-2017 (17-19.05.2017) "Informatsiini tekhnolohii: nauka, tekhnika, tekhnolohiia, osvita, zdorov'ia" – Information technologies: science, engineering, technology, education, health: abstracts of the ХXV International Scientific and Practical Conference MicroCAD-2017, 180. [in Ukrainian].
10.Kasych, A. O., Khimych, I. H. Teoretychni osnovy otsinky ta obliku nematerialnykh aktyviv v Ukraini [Theoretical Fundamentals of Valuation and Accounting of Intangible Assets in Ukraine]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI" – Bulletin of the National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute", 49 (1022), 61-67. [in Ukrainian].
11.Keynes, J. М. (1978). Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti. protsenta i deneg [The general theory of employment, interest and money]. Мoskow: Progress [in Russian].
12.Kozyk, V. V. & Mrykhina O. B. (2017). Aktualizatsiia roli transferu tekhnolohii u systemi "universytet – vlada – biznes" v Ukraini [Updating the role of technology transfer in the system "University – Government - Business" in Ukraine]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu tekhnolohii ta dyzainu. – Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, 2 (109), 29–35. [in Ukrainian].
13.Kosenko, O. P. (2016). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm komertsializatsii intelektualno-innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii na mashynobudivnomu pidpryiemstvi [Organizational and economic mechanism for commercialization of intellectual and innovative technologies at a machine-building enterprise]. Doctor's thesis. Kharkiv: National Technical University of Ukraine "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" [in Ukrainian].
14.Mrykhina, O. B. & Mirkunova, T. I. Osoblyvosti otsiniuvannia innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii, rozroblenykh v universytetakh [Special aspects of assessment of innovative technologies developed in universities]. Tezy dopovidei konferentsii (27-28.09.2017) "Problemy normatyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia innovatsiinoi diialnosti" – Abstracts of the Conference "Problems of Regulatory Support of Innovation Activity", 107. [in Ukrainian].
15.Pererva, P. H. & Hladenko, I. V. (2010). Monitorynh innovatsiinoi diialnosti: interpretatsiia rezultativ [Monitoring of innovation activity: interpretation of results]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2,108-116 [in Ukrainian].
16.Nakaz Fondu Derzhavnoho maina Ukrainy Pro zatverdzhennia Metodyky otsinky mainovykh prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Order of the State Property Fund of Ukraine "On Approval of the Methodology for Valuation of Intellectual Property Rights"]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0726-08 [in Ukrainian].
17.Rogers, E. (2009). Dyfuziia innovatsii [Diffusion of innovation]. Кyiv: Vydavnychyi dim "Kyievo-Mohylianska Akademiia". [in Ukrainian].
18.Sytnyk, Y. S. Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady intelektualizatsii menedzhmentu pidpryiemstva [Theoretical and methodological fundamentals of intellectualization of company management]: Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky [in Ukrainian].
19.Saikevych, M. I. (2015). Otsinka intelektualnoho potentsialu kompanii. Retrieved from http://ir.znau.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/4404/3/ Mater_nauk_prakt_konf_2015_658-662.pdf
20.Tsybuliov, P. M., Chebotariov, V. P., Zinov, V. H. & Suini, Iu. (2005). Upravlinnia intelektualnoiu vlasnistiu [Assessment of the Intellectual Potential of a Company]. Кyiv: "К.І.S." [in Ukrainian].
21.Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Code of Ukraine]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 [inUkrainian].
22.Shpak, N. O. (2014). Osnovy komunikatsiinoho menedzhmentu promyslovykh pidpryiemstv [Fundamentals of communication management of industrial enterprises]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky. [in Ukrainian]
23.Shumpeter, J. (2012). Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku. Doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [Theory of economic development. Studies of revenues, capital, credit, interests and economic cycle]. Kyiv: Kyievo–Mohylianska akademiia. [in Ukrainian].
24.Eggertson, R. (2001). Problemy i instituty [Problems and Institutions]. St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
25.Yastremska, O. M. & Vereshchahina, H. V. (2010). Upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu [Innovation activity management]. Kharkiv: INZHEK. [in Ukrainian].
26.Andriesson, D. (2005). Implementing the KPMG Value Explorer. Critical success factors for applying IC measurement tools. Journal of Intellectual Capital. – 6(4), 474-488 p.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510628771
27.Archer, N. P., Ghasemzadeh, F., Brooking, A., Board, P., Jones, S. (1998). The Predictive Potential of Intellectual Capital, Volume 16, Issue 1-3.
28.Bell, D. (1976). The Coming Of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books; Reissue edition, Jul 21, 616 p.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336501
29.Brooking, A. (1998). Intellectual Capital. International Thomson Business Press, 213 p.
30.Dovbenko, V. I. (2009). Perspective mechanisms of cooperation in sphere of the sustainable development maintenance. 2nd Forum science and technology days Poland-East, 2224.04.2009, Bialystok-Bialowieza, Poland: forum catalogue / Innovative Eastern Poland assoc., Intern. innovation centre of east (IICoE), Poland. — Bialystok, P. 92.
31.Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing Intellectual Capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning. Vol. 30, P. 366-373.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90248-X
32.Edvinsson, L., Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots. – New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc, 225 p.
33.Fink, K. (2004). Knowledge Potential Measurement and Uncertainty. DUV, 271 p.
34.Hall, B. H. (2014). Using patent data as indicators. OST Paris - Patents as Indicators, April 2014, 36 p.
35.Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Retrieved from https://www. worldcat.org/title/innovation-diffusion-as-a-spatial-process/oclc/536383
36.Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Ideas. – London: Penguin Books, 304 р.
37.Huei-Jen, Shiu. (2006). The Application of the Value Added Intellectual Coefficient to Measure Corporate Performance: Evidence from Technological Firms. International Journal of Management; Poole, 23.2 (Jun 2006), P. 356-365.
38.Investopedia. What is the 'Q Ratio (Tobin's Q Ratio)'. Retrieved from http://www.investopedia. com/terms/q/qratio.asp
39.Kamiyama, S., Martinez, C., Sheehan, J. Business performance and intellectual assets: background and issues. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/33848005.pdf
40.Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, P. 75-85.
41.Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes A., Putnam, J. (1998). How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data. The journal of industrial economics, Volume 46, Issue 4, P. 405–432.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00081
42.Livson, B. Knowledge Capital Valuation. Retrieved from: http://bal.com.au/knowledge.pdf
43.Luthy, D. H. Intellectual capital and its measurement. College of Business, Utah State University, USA. 18 p.
44.Monnet, J. (1976). Memoires. Paris: Artheme Fayard.
45.Realizing Society 5.0. A Society with Advanced Biometric Identification. Retrieved from: https://www.japan.go.jp/tomodachi/2017/spring-summer2017/realizing_socie...
46.Stewart, T. A. (1998). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. N.Y.-L.: Doubleday. Currency, 288 pp.
47.Sullivan, P. H. (1998). Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value from Innovation. Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 369 p.
48.Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, Vol. 2, Issue 1, P.73-97.
https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029036
49.Tapscott, D. (1997). The digital economy: promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.Schwab, K.. [Ed.]. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017: report.Geneva: World Economic Forum, 400 p.
51.Baller. S., Dutta S., & Lanvin,B. [Eds].(2017).The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy: Geneva: World Economic Forum, 307 p.
52.Tinbergen, J. De convergentietheorie: antikritiek (The Convergence Theory: Anti-Criticism). Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=uk&lr=&id =xupgf_cIy2YC&oi=fnd&pg=PA41&dq=Tinberge n,+J.+(1972– 3),+'De+convergentietheorie:+antikritiek'+(The+ Convergence+Theory:+Anti-Criticism) World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva). Retrieved from: http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/