In the article the question of the definition in the scientific interpretation of the concept of judicial discretion. On the basis of the analysis seems possible to display a single definition of judicial discretion investigating judge in criminal proceedings, given the peculiarity of his judicial authority in criminal proceedings for the control of the rights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings. It is explained the choice of terms, basic expressions included in the explanation of judicial discretion investigating judge.
1. Erlіh E. Vіl'ne pravoznahodzhennja ta vіl'ne pravoznavstvo [On a free legacy and jurisprudence], Problemy fіlosofіyi prava. Vol. 1–2. Ruta Publ., 2005. P. 168–184.
2. Popovs'kij D. P. Zastosuvannja suddіvs'kogo rozsudu v kraїnah romano-germans'koї pravovoї sіmї [On the application of the discretion of judges among the countries of roman legal family], Naukovij vіsnik mіzhnarodnogo gumanіtarnogo un-tu. Ser.: Jurisprudencіja. No. 10-1, Vol 1, 2014, P. 15–19.
3. Lozovskaja S. V. O sudejskom pravotvorchestve [On the lawmaking of judges], Sibirskij juridicheskij vestnik, 2004, No. 1–10, P. 10.
4. Tkesheliadze G. T. Sudebnaja praktika i ugolovnyj zakon [Legal practice and criminal law], Tbilisi, 1975, P. 114.
5. Kancіr V. S. Problemi sudovogo ugljadu pri zastosuvannі krimіnal'nogo zakonodavstva Ukraїni: avtoref dis. na zdob. nauk. stupenja k.ju.n. [On the problems of legal discretion in the application of criminal law in Ukraine: thesis of dissert. for PhD in law], L'vіv, 1998, 20 p.
6. Makarenko A.S. Suddіvs'kij rozsud pri priznachennі pokarannja v Ukraїnі: diss. na zdob. nauk. stupenja k.ju.n. [The discretion of judges while imposing a penalty in Ukraine: dissert. for PhD in law], Odesa, 2012, 264 p.
7. Ljublinskij P. I. Osnovanija sudejskogo usmotrenija v ugolovnyh delah [On the grounds for discretion of judges in criminal cases], SPb. 1904, P. 3–6.
8. Komissarov K. I. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [On the discretion of judges in soviet civil procedure], Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1969, No 4, P. 50.
9. Malikov M. K. Problemy usmotrenija pravoprimenitelja: priroda, priznaki, predely [On the issues of legal discretion: nature, features and borders], Ufa, 1990, P. 20.
10. Papkova O. A. Ponjatie sudejskogo usmotrenija [On the notion of the discretion of judges], Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, 1997, № 12, P. 107.
11. Berg L. N. Sudebnoe usmotrenie i ego predeli: dissertacija na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata juridicheskih nauk [The discretion of judges and its borders: dissert. for PhD in law], Ekaterinburg, GOUVPO “Ural'skaja gosudarstvennaja juridicheskaja akademija” Publ., 2008, 202 p.
12. Zejkan Ja. O probleme svobodnogo sudebnogo usmotrenija v arbitrazhnom processe [On the problem of the freedom of discretion in arbitrary process], Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Stavropol'skogo kraja, 2004, No. 1, P. 21.
13. Bonner A. T. Primenenie zakona i sudebnoe usmotrenie [The application of law and the discretion of judges], Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1979, No. 6, P. 35.
14. Bіgun V. S. Fіlosofіja pravosuddja: іdeja ta zdіjsnennja: monografіja [The philosophy of justice], K., 2011, 303 p.
15. Osnovi kul'turologії: Navch.posіb. / Za red. L. O. Sandjukta, N. V. Shhubelki. [The basics of culturology: textbook], K. : Centr uchbovoї lіteraturi Publ., 2012, 400 p.
16. Webster Dictionary – Rezhim dostupu: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mental.
17. Studenikin S. S. K obsuzhdeniju voprosa o primenenii norm sovetskogo socialisticheskogo prava [On the discussion on the application of soviet legal rules], Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1954, No. 8, P. 57–67.
18. Haidarov A. A. Sudejskoe usmotrenie i ego predely v sudebnyh stadijah ugolovnogo processa Rossii [Discretion of judges and its borders at the stages of criminal process], Rezhim dostupu: http://www.dissercat. com/content/sudeiskoe-usmotrenie-i-ego-predely-v-sudebnykh-stadiyakh-ugolovnogo-protsessa-rossii