Based on universally recognized theoretical ideas about the nature of legal reasoning and its importance in practical legal activities presented in the domestic scientific literature revealed a number of features argumentation process associated with legal communicative practice. It is noted that the effectiveness of the legal argument largely depends on how fully and deeply comprehended informative entity philosophical nature of legal reasoning, mastered the basic underlying concepts, tools, techniques, rules it, and based on this knowledge to realize that pragmatism legal argument addicts from such different ancient status forming factors of ob’yektsiyi (prediction) as persuasion, justification, motivation etc. that make possible to avoid communicative difficulties in reasoning.
1. Filosofs`ky`j ency`klopedy`chny`j slovny`k [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Philosophy] / red. kol. : V. I. Shy`nkaruk (golova redkolegiyi) ta in. Kyiv : Abry`s, 2002. 744 p.
2. Dudash T. Pravova argumentaciya : stan ta perspekty`vy` doslidzhennya [Legal reasoning: status and prospects of study] /
T. Dudash // Visny`k L`vivs`kogo universy`tetu. Seriya yury`dy`chna. 2016. Vol. 62. pp. 3–13.
3. Kozyubra M. I. Teoriya yury`dy`chnoyi argumentaciyi : stanovlennya, stan ta perspekty`vy` u vitchy`znyanij yury`sprudenciyi [The theory of legal reasoning: establishment, status and prospects of national law] / M. I. Kozyubra // Naukovi zapy`sky` NaUKMA. Yury`dy`chni nauky`. 2012. Vol. 129. – pp. 3–10.
4. Kuznyeczov V. I. Filosofiya prava. Istoriya ta suchasnist` [The philosophy of law. Past and present] : navch. posibny`k / V. I. Kuznyeczov. – Kyiv : BD “Sty`los”; PCz “Fomant”, 2003. 382 p.
5. Bacevy`ch F. S. Filosofiya movy`. Istoriya lingvofilosofs`ky`x uchen` [The philosophy of language. History of linguophilosophical student] : pidruchny`k / F. S. Bacevy`ch. 2-ge vy`d., stereoty`p. Kyiv : VCz “Akademiya”, 2011. 240 p.
6. Chornobaj O. L. Argumentaty`vna prakty`ka v yury`dy`chnij diyal`nosti : naukova problema j mozhly`vosti yiyi vy`rishennya [Argumentative practice in legal activities, scientific problem and its possible solution] / O. L. Chornobaj // Yury`dy`chna nauka. 2015. No 8. pp. 15–19.
7. Cenko M. B. Osoby`stisna zrilist` yury`sta [Personal maturity of lawyer] / M. B. Cenko // Visny`k NU “Yury`dy`chna akademiya Ukrayiny` imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo”. Seriya : filosofiya. 2016. No 4 (31).
pp. 150–160.
8. Vely`ky`j ency`klopedy`chny`j yury`dy`chny`j slovny`k [Great Encyclopedic Dictionary of Law] / za red. Yu. S. Shemshuchenka. 2-ge vy`d., pereroblene i dopovnene. Kyiv : Yury`dy`chna dumka, 2012. 1020 p.
9. Zagnitko A. P. Slovny`k suchasnoyi lingvisty`ky` : ponyattya i terminy` [Dictionary of modern linguistics: concepts and terms] : u 4 t. T. 2 / A. P. Zagnitko. Donecz`k : DonNU, 2012. 350 p.
10. Dudash T. Pravova argumentaciya : do py`tannya pro zagal`ne ponyattya [Legal reasoning: the question of the general concept] / T. Dudash // Pravo Ukrayiny`. 2016. No 8. pp. 99–106.
11. Lyashenko R. D. Pry`roda pravovoyi argumentaciyi [The nature of the legal argument] / R.D. Lyashenko // Visny`k Zaporoz`kogo nacional`nogo universy`tetu. Yury`dy`chni nauky`. 2012. No 4(1). pp. 21–27.
12. Xvorostyankina A. V. Yury`dy`chna argumentaciya v anglo-saksons`kij ta ry`ms`ko-germans`kij pravovy`x sy`stemax : metodologichni zasady` porivnyal`nogo analizu [Legal arguments in the Anglo-Saxon and Roman-Germanic legal systems: methodological principles of comparative analysis] /
A. V. Xvorostyankina // Naukovi zapy`sky` NaUKMA. Yury`dy`chni nauky`. 2012. Vol. 129. pp. 16–19.
13. Rabinovy`ch P. M. Pravova argumentaciya : termino-ponyattyevy`j instrumentarij doslidzhennya [Legal reasoning: the term-concept toolkit study] / P. M. Rabinovy`ch, T. I. Dudash // Visny`k NAPrN Ukrayiny`. 2016. No 2(85). pp. 8–20.