Change of the paradigm of philosophy as a basis of determination in theory of evidence

2018;
: 61-67

Chornobai O., Koval I. "Change of the paradigm of philosophy
as a basis of determination in theory of evidence"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-5-number-902-19...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article is devoted to the study of the history of the formation of the theory of
reasoning in the context of the changes in philosophical knowledge in the second half of the
twentieth century. The main directions of the theory that have had the greatest influence on
the formation of the theory of argumentation, in particular, the neorortex of H. Perelman and
S. Tulmin, the pragma-dialectics of Ehmeren and Grootendorst, are analyzed. Characterized
by the main problems posed by the theory of reasoning: the interaction of the speaker and the
audience during the construction of arguments, the relationship between evidence and
argument.

1. Ivin A. A Osnovy teorii argumentacii [The basis of the theory of argumentation]. M.: Vlados,
1997. 352 p. 2. Politjuk A. P. «Novarytoryka» ta neformal’na logika ["New rhetoric" and informal logic].
Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’kogo universytetu. Serija: Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija. 2012. T. 20.
No. 22(4). pp. 97–102. 3. Perelman Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Logique rhetorique [Rhetorical logic].
Rhеtorique et philosophic. Paris, 1952. pp. 8–9. 4. Jurkevych M. O., V. D. Tytov, S. V. Kucepaltain.
Jurydychna argumentacija. Logichni doslidzhennja [Legal argumentation. Logical research]:
monografija; zazag. red. O. M. Jurkevych. 2-ge vyd., pererobl. tadopov. Harkiv: Pravo, 2015. 336 p.
5. Gorohova I. Istorija osmyslennja problematyky argumentacii’[History of comprehension of the
problems of argumentation]. Gileja: naukovyjvisnyk. 2015. No. 95. pp. 273–278. 6. Zajcev D. V.
Filosofskaja logika i argumentacija [Philosophical Logic and Argumentation]. Polignozis. 2009. No. 1
(34). pp. 3–11. 7. Legchilin A. A., Vorob’eva S. V. Teorija argumentacii H. Perel’mana kak
innovacionnyj bazis uchebnyh kursov [H. Perelman’s theory of reason in gasan innovative basis of
training courses].Kommunikacija v social’no-gumanitarnomznanii, jekonomike, obrazovanii: Materialy II
Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Minsk, 13–14 nojab. 2008 g. Mn., 2008. pp. 21–23. 8. Kashhej N. A.
Sovremennaja ritorika kak metodologija ubezhdenija [Modern rhetoricas a methodology of persuasion].
Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. No. 67. pp. 45–48. 9. Komaha L. G.
Logichni zasady argumentacii’ u filosofs’komu znanni monografija [Logical principles of argumentation
in philosophical knowledge monograph]. Kyi’v: Centr uchbovoi’ literatury, 2015. 360 p.