The statement of the theory of legal argument in the period of antiquity and the roman law

2018;
: pp. 45-50
1
Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article describes the history of the origin of the theory of legal argument in the philosophy of Ancient Greece, reveals the preconditions and reasons for its appearance and development. The analysis of sophistry and its influence on the practice of legal argumentation in ancient legal proceedings, the contribution of Plato and Aristotle to the formation of general theoretical foundations of reasoning, in particular, in logic and rhetoric, as well as their further development and perfection in Roman law (based on the views of Cicero and Seneca of the Elder). It is emphasized on the close relationship between socio-political processes and changes in the theory and practice of legal argumentation.

1. Vandyshev V. M. Rytoryka i sofistyka v istoryko-filosofs'komu dyskursi [Rhetoric and Sophistryin Historical and Philosophical Discourse]: monohrafiya. Sumy: SNAU Publ, 2015. 152 p. 2. ShcherbynaO. Yu. Lohichne modelyuvannya ta yurydychna arhumentatsiya [Logical modeling and legal reasoning]Visnyk Kyyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiya. Politolohiya. 2014.No. 1. pp. 50-53. 3. Komakha L. H. Lohichni zasady arhumentatsiyi u filosofs'komu znanni [Logicalprinciples of argumentation in philosophical knowledge]: monohrafiya. Kyyiv: Tsentr uchbovoyiliteratury, 2015. 360 p. 4. Chornobay O. L. Sofistyka yak dyskursyvna praktyka pravovoyi arhumentatsiyi[Sophistryas a discursive practice of legal argumentation]. Visnyk Natsional'noho universytetu «L'vivs'kapolitekhnika». Yurydychni nauky, 2016. No. 845. pp. 443-453. 5. Pashchenko V. I., Pashchenko N. I.Antychna literatura [Ancient literature]: pidruch. 3-tye vydannya, stereotyp. Kyyiv: Lybid', 2008. 718 p.6. Yurkevych O. M., Tytov V. D., Kutsepal S. V. tain. Yurydychna arhumentatsiya. Lohichnidoslidzhennya. [Legala rgumentation. Logical research]: monohrafiya; zazah. red. O. M. Yurkevych. 2-hevydannya, pererobl. tadopov. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2015. 336 p. 7. Platon. Sofist (Feodor, Sokrat,ChuzhozemecizJelei, Tejetest) [Platon. Sophist (Theodore, Socrates, Alienfrom Elea, Theetest)]. Platon.Sbor. soch.: v 4 t. T. 2 / obshh. red. A. F. Loseva i dr.; primech. A. F. Loseva i A. A. Taho Godi. Moskva :Mysl', 1993. pp. 275-345. 8. Filosofs'kyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk [Philosophical EncyclopedicDictionary] / red. kol.: V. I. Shynkaruk (holova redkolehiyi) tain. Kyyiv: Abrys, 2002. 744 p. 9. Aristotel'.O sofisticheskiho proverzhenijah [Aristotel. About sophisticrefutations]. Aristotel'. Soch.: v 4 t. T. 2 / red.Z. N. Mikeladza. Moskva: Mysl', 1978. pp. 533-593. 10. Shcherbyna O. Yu. Sposoby mirkuvan'y urystivhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(78)90060-5krayin romano-hermans'koho ta anhlo-amerykans'koho prava [Ways of thinking of lawyers in the countriesof Romano-Germanic and Anglo-American law.]. Visnyk Kyyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu imeniTarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiya. Politolohiya, 2010. No. 98. pp. 39-43. 11. Kondratyuk V. V. Arhumentatsiya vnormatyvnykh kontekstakh: problemy rytorychnoyi kontseptsiy i analizu [Argumentation in normativecontexts: the problem of the rhetorical concept of analysis]. Visnyk Kyyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetuimeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiya. Politolohiya, 2012. No. 108. pp. 25-28.

Romanova A., Chornobai O. "The statement of the theory of legal argument in the period of antiquity and the roman law" http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-5-number-894-18-2018/statement-theory-legal-argument-period