Depenalization as a method of criminal-law policy

2018;
: 130-134

Marysyuk K., Kantsir V. "Depenalization as a method of criminal-law policy"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-5-number-902-19...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Educatinoal and Rasearch Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

The article is devoted to analysis of depenalization as a method of criminal-law policy. It
is concluded that the lack of a common understanding of the concept and essence of
depenalization does not allow the full implementation of this method of criminal-law in
practice. At the same time, he could act as one effective instrument for reforming domestic
criminal law in the context of the declared humanization of criminal responsibility and
punishment. It would seem that in this way it would be possible to significantly reduce the
number of convicted persons sentenced to the isolation of a person from society (first of all – to
imprisonment for a certain term), but also to reform the system of criminal penalties in
general, excluding from it or at least substantially reforming obsolete and actually ineffective
types of punishment.

1. Naumov A. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoye pravo [Russian Criminal Law]. Moscow, Volters Kluver,
2007, 736 p. 2. Borysov V. Derzhavna polityka u sferi borotby zi zlochynnistyu ta yiyi napryamky [State
policy in the field of combating crime and its direction], Problemy zakonnosti, 2009, Vol. 100. pp. 305–
312. 3. Lopashenko N. Vvedenye v uholovnoe pravo [Introduction to Criminal Law], Moscow, Volters
Kluver, 2009. 224 p. 4. Korobeev A. Sovyetskaya uholovno-pravovaya politika. Problemy krymynalizatsiii
penalyzattsii [Soviet criminal law. Problems of criminalization and penalization], Vladivostok: Izdatelstvo
Dalnevostochnogo universiteta, 1987. 268 p. 5. Fris P. Kryminalno-pravova polityka Ukrayinskoyi derzhavy:
teoretychni, istorychni ta pravovi problemy [Criminal Law of the Ukrainian State: Theoretical, Historical and
Legal Issues], Kyiv, AtikaPubl., 2005. 332 p. 6. Kuznetsov A. Krymynalizatsiya-dekrimynalizatsiya,
penaliyzatsiya-depenalizatsiya kak soderzhanie ugolovnoy politiki[Criminalization-Decriminalization,
Penalization-Depanalizationas Content of Criminal Policy], Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii,
2017, Vol. 1 (35). pp. 16–18. 7. Ponomarenko Yu. Shchodo spivvidnoshennya penalizatsiyi ta depenalizatsiyi
zlochyniv[On the Correlation between Penalization and Detentization of Offenses], Naukovyy visnyk
Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya Yurydychni nauky, 2015, Vol. 1, Part 4. pp. 47–51.
8. Chaadeev S. Ugolovnaya politika i prestupnost: problemy, puti resheniya [Criminal policy and crime:
problems, ways of dealing], Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 1991. 112 p. 9. Nazymko Ye. Faktory, shcho
obumovlyuyut zastosuvannya depenalizatsiyi [Factors that determine the use of depenalization], Visnyk
Akademiyi prokuratury Ukrayiny, 2009, Vol. 2. pp. 90–96.