Some problems of application of certain precautionary measures as measures of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings

2021;
: 117-122

Huzela M.
"Some problems of application of certain precautionary measures as measures of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-8-number-129-20...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article is devoted to the problem of the purpose and grounds for the application of precautionary measures as a kind of measures to ensure criminal proceedings in the system of measures of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings. In particular, some problematic issues of application of some precautionary measures, in particular, detention, which give rise to systematic violations of individual rights in criminal proceedings, are raised. The current CPC of Ukraine has introduced a number of changes in the procedure for the application of precautionary measures as measures of procedural coercion, which, in general, turned out to be positive. However, the state of practical implementation of the precautionary measures procedure, both by pre-trial investigation bodies and courts, has revealed that both systems have not been properly reformed and remain not fully prepared for such innovations. And most abuses and violations of procedural law occur, first of all, during the application of precautionary measures, most of which fall on the most severe precautionary measure – detention. The author draws attention to several significant problems that have not been resolved in the criminal procedure legislation to date. In particular: – courts have a somewhat formal approach to the application of a measure of restraint in the form of detention, although such a strict measure of restraint is exceptional, and courts sometimes decide to apply it somewhat formally; – the current CPC of Ukraine, unfortunately, does not oblige the court to properly motivate its decision to continue detention, which creates a negative practice of often justifying the extension of detention on the same grounds throughout the period of stay of the suspect, accused in custody ; – incorrect initial qualification of the act entails a real possibility of applying to the person of the suspect detention, which means that due to negligence or abuse of investigation there is such a qualification of the act, which provides a much more real possibility of pre-trial detention; – to date in Ukraine there is no real mechanism for compensation (compensation) for damage caused by illegal activities of investigative and judicial bodies, including for illegal detention.

1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13 kvit. 2012 roku. URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show. 2. Maliarenko V. T. (2005). Perebudova kryminalnoho protsesu Ukrainy v konteksti yevropeiskykh standartiv [Restructuring of the criminal process in Ukraine in the context of European standards]: Monohrafiia. K.: Yurinkom Inter. 512 p. 3. Pro poriadok vyizdu z Ukrainy ta vizdu v hromadian Ukrainy [On the procedure for leaving Ukraine and entering the citizens of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 1.10.2016 roku URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3857-12. 4. Poiasniuvalna zapyska do proektu Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Explanatory note to the draft Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] vid 12.01.12 roku. URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc1250/1. 5. Banchuk O., Dmytriieva I., Saidova Z.ta in. (2013). Realizatsiia novoho KPK Ukrainy u 2013 rotsi (monitorynhovyi zvit). [Implementation of the new CPC of Ukraine in 2013 (monitoring report)] K.: FOP Moskalenko. 40 p. 6. Senchenko N. M. (2015). Zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv do osib, dlia yakykh peredbacheno zakhody medychnoho kharakteru [Application of precautionary measures to persons for whom medical measures are provided]. Naukovyi visnyk Kharkivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. P. 105–110. 7. Shum S. S., Pinchuk I. Ia., Sukhovii O. O. (2013). Rezultaty obhovorennia zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv (st. 508) za novym Kryminalnym protsesualnym kodeksom Ukrainy [Results of the discussion of the application of precautionary measures (Article 508) under the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Visnyk asotsiatsii psykhiatriv Ukrainy. URL: http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/article/37539. 8. Pro psykhiatrychnu dopomohu [On psychiatric care]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22 liutoho 2000 r. (zi zminamy ta dop.). URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n000560–185. 9. Pro poriadok vidshkoduvannia shkody, zavdanoi hromadianynovi nezakonnymy diiamy orhaniv, shcho zdiisniuiut operatyvno-rozshukovu diialnist, orhaniv dosudovoho rozsliduvannia, prokuratury i sudu [On the procedure for compensation for damage caused to a citizen by illegal actions of bodies carrying out operative-search activities, bodies of pre-trial investigation, prosecutor’s office and court]: Zakon Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/266/94- %D0 %B2 %D1 %80#Text.