The article discusses the issue of the essence and scientific status of philosophy. The case is made that philosophy is essentially related to worldview, because it revolves around the most general questions about the world, a human being, and its place in the world – worldview questions, or Big Philosophical Questions. This does not mean that philosophy is a worldview, or a collection of worldviews, or a science about worldviews. It is rather the realm of the search for answers to worldview questions and of the elaboration and rational critical evaluation of the arguments for and against different possible answers, as well as of the critical analysis and development of the categories and conceptual schemes used to think about such questions. Philosophy can also be considered as a science in the wide sense of a systematic knowledge-seeking intellectual activity aimed at truth, an important part of the community of knowledge disciplines that includes not only natural empirical and mathematical sciences but social sciences and humanities as well. At least, such a scientific character is to be expected from academic philosophy. The pluralism of opinions characteristic for philosophy does not undermine its scientific status, because on the one hand, other sciences also provide no guarantees that their accepted theories are true, and there is (to a greater or lesser degree) pluralism of opinions with respect to a number of fundamental issues, and on the other hand, philosophy produces important knowledge of several kinds: about ignorance, about fundamental categories, conceptual schemes and principles of thinking, and about the available alternatives with respect to philosophical issues and relevant arguments.
Berlin, I. (1962/2013). The Purpose of Philosophy. In I. Berlin (auth.), H. Hardy (ed.), The Power of Ideas. 2nd edition, 29-42. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400848843-005
Blackburn, S. (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansson, S.O. (2003). Is Philosophy Science? Theoria, 69, 153-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2003.tb00758.x
Hansson, S.O. (2008). Philosophy and Other Disciplines. Metaphilosophy, 39 (4-5): 472-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00567.x
Hansson, S.O. (2013). Defining Pseudoscience and Science. In: M. Piglucci and M. Boudry (eds.). Philosophy of Pseudoscience, 61-77. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0005
Hors'kyi, V. (2001). The History of Ukrainian Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
McGinn, C. (2015). The Science of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 46(1), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12116
Popper, K. (1959/2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
Popper, K. (1962). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1975/1992). How I See Philosophy. In: K. Popper. In Search of a Better World, 173-187. London and New York: Routledge.
Searle, J. (2007). Philosophy and the Basic Facts. In: J. Searle. Freedom and Neurobiology, 1-35. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shramko, Y. (2010). Philosophy: Science or Worldview?. [In Ukrainian]. Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti, 11, 98-112.
Shramko, Y. (2020). The Nature of Scientific Philosophy. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 29, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2019.029
Shynkaruk, V. (1977/2009).Worldview and Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. In: Hubers'kyi, V. (ed.). Filosofia: khrestomatia (vid vytokiv do s'ohodennia), 163-173. Kyiv: Znannia.
Shynkaruk, V., Yolon, P. (2002). Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. In: Filosofs'kyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk, 670-674. Kyiv: Abrys.
Woleński, J. (2005). Epistemologia: poznanie, prawda, wiedza, realizm. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA.