The article ssleduetsya truth as legal dogma in positive law. Indeed, in our time, justice must be based on the culture of the world of spiritual wealth, freedom, and human civilization produced by the moral principles of social life, human representations and Steen goodness and justice.
The problem of the relation of science and humanitarian and scientific knowledge is regarded as one of central problems of modern epistemology and philosophy of science. This article describes three most common approaches (positions) in relation to the resolution of the problem. The first one, a traditional position, gives priority to the methodology of natural sciences. The second position is based on the neo-Kantian tradition and claims priority to the humanities. The third one, “moderate” position, rejects two first absolute positions.
The article examines the truth with philosophical and legal perspective. In epistemology truth right primarily understood as a process of knowledge of the truth, each of the stages of which can give only relative truth. Fixing some point in the cognitive process as absolutely true suspends the process and turns the truth into a lie because of a mismatch the new conditions and circumstances. It is ignored on this epistemological circumstances built absolutisation positivists significance norms of the law.
The article deals with the moral nature of law as a social phenomenon that is a complete harmonious formation, because its most important task is to consolidate and combine those parts of the integrated world of the society and man which are being destroyed. Under the natural and legal approach law is analyzed as justice, perfection, and truth.
The paper investigates the category of “intuition”, its historical and philosophical traditions, comparative legal analysis of the understanding of the concept of different philosophers of the XVII century, etc.