STATICS OF ADSORPTION OF ANIONIC SURFACTANTS

EP.
2022;
: pp. 196-200
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa

The paper presents the results of the study of the statics of adsorption of surface-active substances from model solutions by activated carbon and zeolite. The results of photometric determination of the concentration of anionic surfactants before and after adsorption are presented. The results of adsorption capacity calculations are presented. The experimental results using the program (Langmuir 1.03) were numerically calculated. Sorption isotherms of sodium dodecyl sulfate indicate the mechanism of monomolecular physical adsorption. A good convergence of experimental data and theoretical calculations were established, the coefficient of determination R2>0.9, the value of the Chebyshev criterion 9·10-4 ... 2·10-4, and the root mean square deviation equal to 0 were established.

1. Amirianshoja, T., Junin, R., Idris, A. K., & Rahmani, O. (2013). A comparative study of surfactant adsorption by clay minerals. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 101, 21-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.10.002

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.10.002

2. Liu, Z., Zhao, G., Brewer, M., Lv, Q., & Sudhölter, E.J. (2021). Comprehensive review the surfactant adsorption he mineral surfaces in chemical enhanced oil recovery. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 294, 102467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102467

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102467

3. Peng, M., Duignan, T.T., & Nguyen, A.V. (2020). Quantifying the counterion-specific effect he surfactant adsorption using modeling, simulation, and experiments. Langmuir, 36(43), 13012-13022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02403

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02403

4. Sabadash, V., Gumnitsky, J., & Hertsyk, T. (2018). Thermodynamic studies on the adsorption behavior of ammonium on zeolite. Proceedings of the 8th International Youth Science Forum "Litteris et Artibus", 22–24 November, 2018, Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University, 2018, pp. 190–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.23939/lea2018.01.190

https://doi.org/10.23939/lea2018.01.190

5. Sabadash, V., Gumnitsky, J., Lyuta, O., & Pochapska, I. (2018). Thermodynamics of (NH 4 + ) cation adsorption under static conditions. Chemistry & Chemical Technology, 12(2), 143-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht12.02.143

https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht12.02.143

6. Sabadash, V., Gumnitsky, Y., & Liuta, O. (2020). Investigation of the process of ammonium ion adsorption by nature and synthetic sorbents by methods of multidimensional cluster analysis. Environmental Problems, 5(2), 113-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2020.02.113

https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2020.02.113

7. Somasundaran, P., Healy, T.W., & Fuerstenau, D.W. (1964). Surfactant adsorption at the solid-liquid interface - dependency of mechanism he chain length. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 68(12), 3562-3566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100794a021

https://doi.org/10.1021/j100794a021

8. Soudejani, H.T., Kazemian, H., Inglezakis, V.J., & Zorpas, A.A. (2019). Application of zeolites in organic waste composting: A review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 22, 101396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101396

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101396

9. Yekeen, N., Manan, M.A., Idris, A.K., & Samin, A.M. (2017). Influence of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations he surfactant Adsorption and foaming characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 149, 612-622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.018

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.018

10. Yekeen, N., Padmanabhan, E., Idris, A.K., & Ibad, S.M. (2019). Surfactant adsorption behaviours onto shale from Malaysian formations: Influence of silicon dioxide nanoparticles, surfactant type, temperature, salinity and shale lithology. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 179, 841-854. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.096

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.096