3d model of Medova cave, Lviv

1
Department of Engineering Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Department of Engineering Geodesy of Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
4
General Commission of Survey, Saudi Arabia, Lviv Polytechnic National University
5
Department of Engineering Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University

The purpose of this article is to present and provide a detailed analysis of the 3D model of the Medova Cave in Lviv, created using laser scanning technology. The main objectives include revealing the accuracy and detailing the obtained model, as well as determining its potential applications in various fields such as geological research, scientific exploration, cultural heritage, and tourism. Additionally, the article aims to emphasize the importance and advantages of using laser scanning for creating precise and realistic 3D cave models, opening new possibilities for the study and preservation of natural unique formations. Method. The article describes the methodology used to create a 3D model of the Medova Cave, which involves several key steps. Firstly, a thorough reconnaissance of the cave is conducted to identify technical and logistical aspects such as temperature, humidity, movement restrictions, and lighting that are necessary for the scan. Next, ground-based laser scanning is employed, proving effective in conditions of complete darkness and limited space, to ensure accurate data collection regarding the cave's geometry. Reflective markers are strategically placed inside the cave before scanning, facilitating efficient scanning and alignment of scans. Specialized equipment such as GNSS receivers (Trimble R7) and ground-based laser scanners (Faro Focus 3D 120) are utilized for data collection. Software tools like Faro Scene are used for stitching together scans into a unified 3D point cloud model during data processing. Finally, the accuracy of marker connections is analyzed to ensure high-quality registration, and the 3D model is constructed. Detailed 3D models, including textured models and cross-sections for visualizing the internal structure of the cave, were constructed using software such as Move. Results. The research on the Medova Cave, employing ground-based laser scanning, yielded an accurate and detailed 3D model of the cave. This model opens new perspectives for geological and geomorphological studies, tourism development, and cultural heritage preservation. The use of advanced scanning technologies allowed for a comprehensive representation of the cave's geometric features, considering its complex structure and varied dimensions. Scientific novelty and practical significance. The creation of the 3D model of the Medova cave using laser scanning signifies progress in cave geometry studies. The innovation lies in the utilization of advanced laser scanning technologies to ensure a detailed representation of the cave's geometric features, accounting for its complex structure and diverse dimensions. The novelty also lies in the development of a data collection and processing strategy in conditions of complete darkness and limited cave space, resulting in an accurate and realistic 3D model. Practically, the 3D model of the Medova Cave serves as a crucial tool for geological and geomorphological research and the exploration of unique natural formations. The model opens new opportunities for tourism development, where virtual cave exploration can provide a unique experience for visitors. Creating this 3D model is a significant step in preserving and documenting cultural heritage, contributing to the scientific and cultural development of the region, and providing access to unique objects for researchers and the public.

  1. Beraldin, J. A., Blais, F., Cournoyer, L., Picard, M., Gamache, D., Valzano, V., ... & Gorgoglione, M. A. (2006, October). Multi-Resolution Digital 3D Imaging System Applied to the Recording of Grotto Sites: the Case of the Grotta dei Cervi. In The 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (pp. 45-52).
  2. Blais, F., (2004). Review of 20 years of range sensor development. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 13 (1): 231-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1631921
  3. Buchroithner, M. F. & Gaisecker, T. (2009). Terrestrial laser scanning for the visualization of a complex dome in an extreme alpine cave system. Photogrammetrie - Fernerkundung - Geoinformation, 4: 329–339.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1432-8364/2009/0025
  4. Bubniak, I., Bubniak, A., Shylo, E., Oliinyk, M., & Bihun, M. (2021, November). Virtual otcrop of Eocene rocks of the Sokilskyi ridge (Outer Ukrainian Carpathians, Ivano-Frankivsk Region). In 15th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment (Vol. 2021, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215K2077
  5. Bubniak, I. M., Bubniak, A. M., Gavrilenko, O. D., Nikulishyn, V. I., & Golubinka, I. I. (2019, May). Using laser scanning and digital photogrammetry for creation of virtual geological outcrops: Case studies from the west of Ukraine. In 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects (Vol. 2019, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902078
  6. Caprioli, M., Minchilli, M., Scognamiglio, A. & Strisciuglio, G. (2003). Architectural and natural heritage: virtual reality with photogrammetry and laser scanning. In: Proceedings of XIXth International Symposium CIPA, Antalya, Turkey, p. 1–5.
  7. Chandelier, L. & Roche, F. (2009). Terrestrial laser scanning for paleontologists: the Tautavel Cave. In: XXII CIPA Symposium: Digital Documentation, Interpretation & Presentation of Cultural Heritage, Kyoto, Japan, 11-15 October, 2009, p. 1–5
  8. El-Hakim, S.F., Fryer, J. & Picard, M. (2004). Modeling and visualization of aboriginal rock art in the Baiame Cave. In: Proceedings of the XXth Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: 12-23 July 2004, Istanbul, Turkey. Commission V, Working Group V/2, p. 990–995.
  9. Fryer, J. G., Chandler, J. H. & El-hakim, S. F., (2005). Recording and modelling an aboriginal cave painting: with or without laser scanning? International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2: 1-8.
  10. Haddad, N. A. (2011). From ground surveying to 3D laser scanner: A review of techniques used for spatial documentation of historic sites. Journal of King Saud University of Engineering Sciences, 23 (2): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2011.03.001
  11. Kordic, B., Dapo, A. & Pribicevic, B. (2012). Application of terrestrial laser scanning in the preservation of fortified caves. In: FIG Working Week 2012. Knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, evaluate the cultural heritage, Rome, Italy, 7 p.
  12. Kuzik, Z., Stavovyi, A., & Ilkiv, T. (2017). Documentation and modeling of archaeological objects using digital photogrammetry. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Production, (1), 125-130. (in Ukrainian).
  13. Malitskyi, A., & Bubniak, I. (2017). Geological researches of Dyravets rock with using of land laser scanning. (in Ukrainian).
  14. Marusazh, K. I. (2021). Development of a methodology for comprehensive research of changes in surface volumes of island glaciers on the Antarctic coast (Doctoral dissertation, National University "Lviv Polytechnic"). (in Ukrainian).
  15. McFarlane, D. A., Buchroithner, M., Lundberg, J., Petters, C., Roberts, W. & Rentergen G. V. (2013). Integrated three-dimensional laser scanning and autonomous drone surface-photogrammetry at Gomantong Caves, Sabah, Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Speleology, Brno, 1: 317–319.
  16. Perperidoy, D. G., Tzortzioti, E. & Sigizis, K., (2010). A new methodology for surveying and exploring complex environments using 3D scanning. In: FIG Congress 2010 - Facing the Challenges - Building the Capacity, Sydney, 11-16 April 2010, p. 1–14.
  17. Robson-Brown, K. A., Chalmers A., Saigol T., Green C. & D’Errico F. (2001). An automated laser scan survey of the Upper Palaeolithic rock shelter of Cap Blanc. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28:283–289.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0574
  18. Rüther, H., Chazan, M., Schroeder, R., Neeser, R., Held, C., Walker, S. J. & Horwitz, L. K. (2009). Laser scanning for conservation and research of African cultural heritage sites: the case study of Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36: 1847–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.012
  19. Savchyn, I., Shylo, Y., Bubniak, I., & Bubniak, A. (2019, November). Creation of the geological virtual govoruha dome outcrop (galindez island, western antartica). In Monitoring 2019 (Vol. 2019, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903270
  20. Shaw, T. (2004). Speleologist. In: Gunn J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York, p. 686-689.
  21. Shultz, R. V., Bilous, B., & Honcheriuk, O. M. (2016). Monitoring architectural monuments using terrestrial laser scanning. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, 46, 202-207. (in Ukrainian).
  22. Silvestre, I., Rodrigues, J. I., Figueiredo, M. J. G. & VeigaPires, C. (2013). Cave chamber data modeling and 3D web visualization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, p. 468–473.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2013.103
  23. Tsakiri, M., Sigizis, K., Billiris, H. & Dogouris, S., (2007). 3D laser scanning for the documentation of cave environments. In: 11th ACUUS Conference: Underground Space, Expanding the Frontiers, 10-13 September 2007, Athens, p. 403–408.
  24. Zorin, D. O. (2008). Geological environment disturbances in Transnistria caused by karst processes. Environmental Safety and Rational Nature Management. Scientific Bulletin of IFNTUNG, 1(17), 150-155. (in Ukrainian).