Focal mechanism of the induced earthquake of 2015-06-13 (Alberta, Canada), based on waveform inversion

https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2023.01.070
Received: April 20, 2023
1
Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of NAS of Ukraine
2
Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the NAS of Ukraine

Understanding the source mechanisms of induced earthquakes is important to distinguish them from natural earthquakes. The main objective of our study consists in finding out which parameters of the source mechanism can be used most effectively to identify the induced earthquakes. A possibility is also being explored whether they can be retrieved from data of a limited number of stations or even just one. We calculate versions of the seismic moment tensor and the corresponding focal mechanisms of the induced event of 2015-06-13 (t0=23:57:53.00 UTC, φ=54.233˚N, λ=-116.627˚E, hs=4 km, ML4.4) near Fox Creek, Alberta, Canada, by inversion of only direct waves recorded at one, two, three and seven stations. The versions turned out to be practically identical, which indicates the advantage of using only direct waves and the very possibility of determining the focal mechanism from the records at the limited number of seismic stations, which may be especially valuable in areas with a sparse seismic network. The versions also turned out to be very similar to the one obtained in [Wang, 2018], which can be considered an additional proof of the reliability of our method. The source time function of the Alberta event had a longer duration (~4 s) than is typical for tectonic earthquakes of similar size. We assume that this very feature may be specific to induced earthquakes and used in combination with others to distinguish them from tectonic earthquakes.

  1. Dziewonski, A., & Woodhouse, J., (1983). An experiment in the systematic study of global seismicity: Centroid moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981, Journal of Geophysical Research, 88, 3247-3271. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB04p03247
  2. Eaton, D. W., & Mahani, A. B. (2015). Focal mechanisms of some inferred induced earthquakes in Alberta, Canada, Seismological Research Letters, 86 (4), 1078-1085. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150066
  3. Godano, M., Bardainne, T., Regnier, M., & Deschamps, A. (2011). Moment tensor determination by nonlinear inversion of amplitudes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(1), 366-378. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090380
  4. Hardebeck, J. L., & Shearer, P. M. (2003). Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(6), 2434-2444. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020236
  5. Mahani, A., B., Malytskyy, D., Visser, R., Hayes, M., Gaucher, M., Kao, H. (2021). Well-log-based velocity and density models for the Montney unconventional resource play in Northeast British Columbia, Canada, applicable to induced seismicity monitoring and research, Seismological Research Letters, 82(2A), 886-894. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200213
  6. Mai, M., Schorlemmer, D., Page, M.,..., Malytskyy, D., et al. (2016). The Earthquake-Source Inversion Validation (SIV) Project, Seismological Research Letters, 87, 690-708. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150231.
  7. Malytskyy, D. (2010). Analytic-numerical approaches to the calculation of seismic moment tensor as a function of time, Geoinformatika, 1, 79-85. (in Ukrainian) http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/95654
  8. Malytskyy, D. (2016). Mathematical modeling in the problems of seismology, Naukova Dumka. (in Ukrainian)
  9. Malytskyy, D., & Kozlovskyy, E. (2014). Seismic waves in layered media, J. of Earth Science and Engineering, 4(5), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-581X/2014.05.006
  10. Malytskyy, D., & D’Amico, S. (2015). Moment tensor solutions through waveforms inversion, ISBN: 978-88-98161-13-3, Mistral Service sas, Earth and Environmental Sciences.
  11. Sileny, J., Panza, G.F., & Campus, P. (1992). Waveform inversion for point source moment tensor retrieval with variable hypocentral depth and structural model, Geophysical Journal International, 109(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb00097.x
  12. Sipkin, S. A. (1986). Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of waveform data, global seismicity 1981-1983, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 76(6), 1515-1541. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0760061515
  13. Vavrychuk, V., & Kuhn, D. (2012). Moment tensor inversion of waveforms: a two-step time frequency approach, Geophysical Journal International, 190, 1761-1776. http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150613235753/ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05592.x
  14. Wang, R. (2018). Source Analysis of Induced Earthquakes in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geophysics, University of Alberta. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3Z60CJ0B
  15. Weber, Z. (2006). Probabilistic local waveform inversion for moment tensor and hypocentral location, Geophysical Journal International, 165(2), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02934.x
  16. Weber, Z. (2016). Probabilistic waveform inversion for 22 earthquake moment tensors in Hungary: new constraints on the tectonic stress pattern inside the Pannonian basin. Geophysical Journal International, 204(1), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv446