Seismic moment tensor and focal mechanism of the October 9, 2023 earthquake in Eastern Slovakia

Received: January 18, 2024
1
Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of NAS of Ukraine
2
Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences
3
Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences
4
Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the NAS of Ukraine
5
Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
6
Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Center, Riga
7
Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy, Carpathian Branch of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

The accuracy of the focal mechanism solution mainly depends on the number of stations used and becomes problematic especially in the case of weak earthquakes and sparse networks. In our study, we retrieve the seismic moment tensor of the M=5 earthquake on 9 October 2023 (18:23:09 UTC, 21.783°E, 49.086°N, depth 11.5 km) in Eastern Slovakia from its records at only four seismic stations. Our seismic moment tensor inversion is based on the point source approach and the use of only direct waves calculated by the matrix method. Displacements on the surface of an elastic, horizontally-layered medium are generated using the frequency-wavenumber integration technique. The advantage of using only direct P- and S- waves in our inversion method is that they are less sensitive to path effects compared to reflected and converted waves, which reduces the impact of an inaccurate velocity structure and improves the accuracy and reliability of the result. Based on the forward modeling, a numerical technique was developed for the inversion of the observed waveforms for the components of the moment tensor M(t) using the generalized inversion solution. Before applying our method to the earthquake of October 9, 2023, it was also tested on the April 23, 2020 earthquake (23:18:26.42 UTC, 21.945°E, 48.781°N, magnitude M=5, depth 9 km), also in Eastern Slovakia, using data from only three stations. The resulting versions of the mechanism compare well with a very reliable version previously determined from the polarities of the first P-waves at a much larger number of stations, which only confirms the reliability of our inversion method and the very possibility of obtaining useful results from data of only limited number of stations.

  1. Aki, K. & Richards, P. G. (1980). Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, Vol. I, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin1948.46.4_381
  2. Dreger, D. S., & Helmberger, D. V. (1993). Determination of source parameters at regional distances with three‐component sparse network data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 98(B5), 8107-8125. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB00023
  3. Dziewonski, A. M., Chou, T. A., & Woodhouse, J. H. (1981). Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 86(B4), 2825-2852. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB04p02825
  4. Herrmann, R. B. (2002). An overview of synthetic seismogram computation, computer programs in Seismology. Saint Louis University, 183 pp.
  5. Herrmann, R. B. (2008). Toward automated focal mechanism and moment determination for the continental U.S. – an ANSS product. Final Technical Report USGS Grant 05HQGR0047, 16 pp.
  6. Herrmann, R. B., Withers, M. & Benz, H. (2008). The April 18, 2008 Illinois earthquake: an ANSS monitoring success. Seismological Research Letters, 79(6), 830-843. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.6.830
  7. Malytskyy, D. (2010). Analytic-numerical approaches to the calculation of seismic moment tensor as a function of time. Geoinformatika, 1, 79-85. (In Ukrainian). http://www.geology.com.ua/UK/2010-1-79-85/
  8. Malytskyy, D., (2016). Mathematical modeling in the problems of seismology, Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, – 277 p. (in Ukrainian).
  9. Malytskyy, D. & S. D. Amico, (2015). Moment tensor solutions through waveforms inversion, ISBN: 978-88-98161-13-3, Mistral Service S.a.S., Earth and Enviromental Sciences
  10. Malytskyy, D. & Gnyp, A. (2023). Focal mechanism of the induced earthquake of 2015-06-13 (Alberta, Canada) based on waveform inversion, Geodynamics, 1(34), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2023.01.070
  11. Zhu, L., Akyol, N., Mitchell, B. & Sozbiliz, H. (2006). Seismotectonics of western Turkey from high resolution earthquake relocations and moment tensor determinations. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(7)., L07316, 4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025842