Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

This article examines organizational and legal regulations of the relations between the Government Agent of Ukraine before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. The main stages of these relations are distinguished and the analysis of the activities of the Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights is made. The problems of regulating relations between the Government Agent of Ukraine and the European Court of Human Rights are defined and the ways of their solution are suggested.

The article attempts to move from purely theoretical research on the role of judicial practice in Ukraine to more practical aspects of this issue. It is stated that, taking into account the provisions of procedural codes, legal conclusions of the Supreme Court, it is inevitable to live in the center of respect for scientists (it should be noted that legal practitioners began to study this area earlier and intensify it for scientists).

In this article, I research merely on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding citizenship, its acquisition, and termination (Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom (1985), Riener v. Bulgaria (2006), Genovese v. Malta (2012), Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg (2007), Stamose v. Bulgaria» (2013), Menneson v. France (2014) і Labassee v. France (2014), Biao v. Denmark (2016), Ramadan v. Malta (2016), Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (2017)).