criminal offense

The article is devoted to the analysis of the issue of the identity of the criminal as an integral element of the forensic characterization of illegal privatization of state and collective property, the responsibility for which is provided by Art. 233 of the Criminal code of Ukraine. The opinion is substantiated that in order to build an effective forensic characterization, only those elements should be singled out that have a clear orientation and search orientation and can contribute to the determination of further directions of investigation.

The article deals with the problem of criminal offenses in the information sphere, in
particular new ways of criminal activity, called cybercrime. Against this background, research,
first of all, on foreign experience in solving the problem of preventing criminal offenses in the
informational sphere is currently quite a significant task for the national legal science.
Based on the research of the scientific positions of individual scientists and the analysis of
the current legislation of Ukraine, international legal acts conclude that Ukraine, in the form

In the article, on the basis of the analysis of normative legal acts, the grounds and
problems of compensation for material and non-pecuniary damage following a civil claim in
criminal proceedings are considered.