judicial practice

This article establishes that conciliation of parties in Ukraine’s administrative justice system serves as an effective tool for alternative dispute resolution, contributing to the reduction of judicial system workload, optimization of state resources, and prompt restoration of citizens’ violated rights. Conciliation is grounded in principles of voluntariness, mutual concessions, and compliance with public interests, enabling parties to reach a compromise without a full judicial trial.

Uniformity of judicial practice is an important condition for the modern judicial system of our country in the context of globalization and integration into the European legal space. 

It is proved that the unity of judicial practice is not an end in itself; judicial practice should primarily serve to establish justice and protect people and their rights. Courts must make decisions and resolve complex cases; they should not evade decision-making by arguing that there is no regulatory framework, while deviating from previous case law.

The article provides a legal analysis of criminal offenses against property, in particular those provided for in Section VI of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Particular attention is paid to the problems of qualification, differentiation between related offenses (theft, robbery, fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation of property, etc.), as well as the difficulties in determining intent, form of guilt, motive, and purpose.

This article examines the institution of rehabilitation of illegally convicted persons in the legal system of Ukraine. It was determined that the rehabilitation of illegally convicted persons in the legal system of Ukraine is an important step for ensuring justice and restoring trust in justice. It has been studied that the institution of rehabilitation of illegally convicted persons plays an important role in the legal system of Ukraine, having a significant impact on the development of justice and the protection of human rights.

The article analyzes the decision of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in a case brought by a NGO Urgenda. The arguments of the courts of different instances regarding the possibility of applying the rules of the European Convention of Human Rights in the cases of climate change are highlighted. It is stated that the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of the Netherlands have applied Art. 2 and 8 of the Convention in their classic sense by the European Court of Human Rights