Abstract. The procedure of party reconciliation is an important element of administrative proceedings that facilitates effective and prompt resolution of disputes between citizens and government authorities. In the current context of Ukraine, there is a pressing need to improve this procedure to enhance the effectiveness of administrative justice, reduce the burden on the judicial system, and ensure adequate protection of citizens' rights and freedoms. In this regard, studying international experience appears as a valuable source of useful practices and tools for reforming existing approaches.
This article examines the primary models of party reconciliation in administrative proceedings across different countries, particularly those in the European Union, the United States, and Canada. Special attention is given to alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation and negotiation, which are widely utilized in these jurisdictions. It is demonstrated that these mechanisms contribute to reducing time and resource expenditures, increasing parties' satisfaction with the outcomes of conflict resolution, and lowering the level of confrontation among process participants.
Based on an analysis of international experience, the author proposes recommendations for improving the procedure of reconciliation in Ukraine's administrative proceedings. Among the suggested measures are the implementation of mandatory mediation at certain stages of court proceedings, the establishment of an institute of independent mediators within the courts, the enhancement of the legal culture of process participants, and the development of new legal norms to promote voluntary dispute resolution.
The proposed changes would contribute to a more effective functioning of Ukraine's judicial system and ensure better access to justice for citizens, representing an important step in the reform of the country's legal system towards European standards.
The application of international experience will also enable the introduction of new approaches to the training of judges and other participants in the reconciliation process, thereby enhancing their professional competence and ability to effectively apply mediation procedures. Furthermore, the adaptation of such practices will help create more transparent and predictable dispute resolution processes, fostering greater public trust in the judicial system. The successful implementation of these changes will be a step towards harmonizing national legislation with European standards, ensuring greater effectiveness and fairness in administrative proceedings in Ukraine.
1. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrayiny (2005, July 06) No 2747-IV [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / VR Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text (Аccessed: 12.09.2024). [In Ukrainian].
2. Alternative dispute resolution in administrative matters – Answers from the German Bundesverwaltungsgericht. 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.aihja.org/ images/users/114/files/Germany_-_Report_2016_Germany-Repor2016.pdf (Аccessed: 15.09.2024) [In English].
3. Horova A. (2005). Pryklady isnuiuchykh prohram vidnovnoho pravosuddia v inshykh krainakh [Examples of existing restorative justice programs in other countries]. Vidnovne pravosuddia v Ukraini. No 1-2. P. 130–133 [In Ukrainian].
4. Tumaniants A. R. (2007) Mediatsiia v suchasnii yevropeiskii praktytsi: dosvid Frantsii ta Belhii [Mediation in modern European practice: the experience of France and Belgium]. Problemy zakonnosti : resp. mizhvid. nauk. zb. Kharkiv. Vyp. 90. P. 166–170 [In Ukrainian].
5. United Kingdom Civil Procedure Rules of 1998. No. 3132. Status of 28 November 2019. Retrieved from: https://www. justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules (Аccessed: 12.09.2024) [In English].
6. Judiciary for England and Wales. The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Admin_Court_JRG_2018... (Аccessed: 12.09.2024) [In English].