The article is devoted to the application of artificial intelligence in jurisprudence. Artificial intelligence systems can be applied in various sectors of the economy and be integrated into the justice system, spreading across borders and can easily circulate around the world. Some states have already considered adopting national rules to ensure that artificial intelligence is reliable and safe, and that it is developed and used in accordance with fundamental rights obligations. Different national rules can lead to fragmentation of the internal market and can reduce legal certainty for operators developing, importing or using artificial intelligence systems. Thus, a consistent and high level of protection should be ensured to create a reliable AI, and divergences that hinder the free movement, innovation, deployment and dissemination of AI systems and related products and services in the internal market should be prevented by establishing uniform obligations for operators and guaranteeing equal protection of important public interest considerations and the rights of individuals throughout the internal market. It is necessary to develop special rules regarding the protection of personal data processing of AI systems for remote biometric identification for law enforcement agencies, the use of AI systems for risk assessment of individuals, and the use of artificial intelligence systems for biometric categorization in law enforcement activities. To determine the legal status of the use of artificial intelligence in all areas of human life and its impact on sentencing in the justice system. Artificial intelligence technologies help lawyers in the field of automation and analysis of tasks, search and decision-making, increasing the level and accessibility of justice, adaptation to changes in legislation.
- Artificial Intelligence Act URL: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/ai-act-explorer/ (Accessed: 15.07.2025) [In Ukrainian].
- Hervé Jacquemin and Alexandre de Steel, L’intelligence artificielle et le droit [Artificial Intelligence and the Law], Part 2, Title 1: “La robotisation de la justice [The Robotization of Justice].” [In Ukrainian].
- R. Ambrogi, “In Toronto, A Legal Robot Reveals Its Innards,” Above the Law, July 29, 2019 [In Ukrainian].
- T. Wickers, « L'intelligence artificielle, données de base », Cahiers de droit de l'entreprise, juill. 2019, n° 4, dossier 24[In Ukrainian].
- P. Berlioz, “L’EFB et la transformation numérique de la profession d’avocat [Bar School and the digital transformation of the legal profession],” Revue pratique de la prospective et de l’innovation, No. 1, April 2018, 2. [In Ukrainian].
- A.A. Hyde, “Avocat et intelligence artificielle: quelles obligations, quelles responsabilités?” [Lawyers and artificial intelligence: obligations and responsibilities], D. 2019. 2107. [In Ukrainian].
- R. Susskind, “You have five years to reinvent the legal profession,” The Law Society Gazette (April 27, 2016). https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/ law/susskind-you-have- fve-years-to-reinvent-thelegal-profession/5054990 (Accessed: 15.07.2025) [In Ukrainian].
- Berezyuk Ya. Artificial intelligence as the basis of digital justice: assistant or future competitor of the judge? All-Ukrainian seminar for judges of local and appellate courts "Application of artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence) in justice: foreign and domestic experience April 12, 2024 Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supr... (Accessed: 15.07.2025) [In Ukrainian].