The article is devoted to questions of administrative responsibility for violation of
ecological safety in the Chоrnobyl exclusion zone, outline its general characteristics, analysis of
legal acts on their conformity to the realities of the present and the development of possible
ways and areas of improvement of legislation.
It has been determined that under the administrative responsibility for violation of
ecological safety in the Chорrnobyl exclusion zone should be understood as the legal
relationship established in the relevant legal form, which arises between the state in the person
of its special bodies and the person (physical, official or legal) that committed the violation
ecological safety in the Chоrnobyl Exclusion Zone, concerning the application to the offender
of appropriate measures of state coercion provided for by the norms of administrative law.
1. Andreitsev V. I. Ekolohichne pravo [Environmental law]: Kurs lektsii: Navch. posibnyk dlia yuryd. fak. vuziv. K.: Venturi, 1996. 208 p. 2. Baliuk H. I. Deiaki problemy udoskonalennia yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti u sferi vykorystannia yadernoi enerhii ta zabezpechennia radioekolohichnoi bezpeky [Some problems of improving legal liability in the area of nuclear energy use and providing radioecological safety]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky, 2000. Vyp. 37. P. 26–33. 3. Ekolohichne pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk dlia vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv z hryfom MON Ukrainy [Environmental Law of Ukraine: A textbook for higher educational establishments with a stamp of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.]. Za red. Karakasha I. I. Odesa, «Feniks», 2012. 788 p. 4. Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava [General theory of state and law]: [Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv yurydychnykh vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv] / M. V. Tsvik, O. V. Petryshyn, L. V. Avramenko ta in.; Za red. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad. APrN Ukrainy M. V. Tsvika, d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad. APrN Ukrainy O. V. Petryshyna. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2009. 584 p. 5. Koziurenko R. S. Zakhody administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti za vchyneni pravoporushennia: poniattia ta klasyfikatsiia [Measures of administrative responsibility for the committed offenses: concept and classification.]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky, 2016. No. 845. P. 94–98. 6. Leliak Ya. O. Osoblyvosti protydii zlochynnosti na terytorii Chornobylskoi zony vidchuzhennia [Features of counteraction to crime in the territory of the Chernobyl exclusion zone]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.08. Nats. akad. prokuratury Ukrainy. K.: [B.v.], 2015. 20 p. 7. Melnyk O. V. Konstytutsiino-pravova vidpovidalnist vyshchykh orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady [Constitutional and legal responsibility of the highest bodies of state power.]. Dys. na zdob. nauk. stup. kand. yur. nauk. K., 2000. 175 p. 8. Myroshnychenko N. A. Vyznachennia prostupku ta zlochynu v kryminalnomu pravi Ukrainy [Determination of misconduct and crime in the criminal law of Ukraine.]. Aktualni problemy polityky, 2014. Vyp. 51. P. 331–336. 9. Siriak V. I. Pravove zabezpechennia ekolohichnoi bezpeky na terytoriiakh, shcho zaznaly radioaktyvnoho zabrudnennia [Legal support of ecological safety in areas that have been exposed to radioactive contamination]: avtoref. dys... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.06. Nats. ahrar. un-t. K., 2008. 19 p. 10. Fedotova H. V. Kryterii vidmezhuvannia kryminalnoho prostupku vid zlochynu ta administratyvnoho pravoporushennia [Criteria for distinguishing criminal offense from crime and administrative offense.]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 2016. Vyp. 38 (2). P. 91–94. 12. Shemshuchenko Yu. S., Muntian V. L., Rozovskyi B. H. Yurydycheskaia otvetstvennost v oblasty okhranы okruzhaiushchei sredы [Legal responsibility in the field of environmental protection]; Yn-t hos. y prava AN USSR. K.: Nauk. Dumka, 1978. 280 p.