Problems of tolerance of law enforcers in modern multicultural society

2020;
: 133-138
Authors:
1
Ph.D., Assoc. Prof.

The article deals with the problematic issues of equality, tolerance and non-discrimination in law enforcement activities, reveals the peculiarities of communication between law enforcement officials in a modern multicultural society. It is determined that the problem of communicative tolerance of law enforcement officials is very urgent nowadays, as it is a necessary feature that determines the nature and specificity of the law enforcement officer's relations with others, taking into account his personal experience, interests, inclinations, behavior patterns and communication peculiarities. It has been found out that the activities of the National Police officers in a modern multicultural society imply the establishment of effective communication and trusting relations with the population, enhancement of the authority and positive image of the police. It is the quality of police communication with citizens that is one of the main factors in the effectiveness of law enforcement. Reforming Ukraine's law enforcement agencies is one of the most important steps towards becoming a democratic state, dominated by the rule of law. Their effective activity becomes a prerequisite for the protection of the constitutional order, ensuring the rule of law and order, respect for the rights and freedoms of the individual and the citizen. Building a democratic state in Ukraine and thorough reforming of law enforcement agencies, consolidating the partnership model of law enforcement relations with society, ensuring real public and personal security with particular urgency raise the issue of tolerance in relations between law enforcement officials and citizens.

Pro Nacionalnu policiyu: Zakon Ukrayiny (2015, July 2) № 580-VIII [About the National Police: Law of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua. (accessed 23.04.2020).2. Thorndike E. L. (1920) Intelligence and its use. Harper's Magazine. №140. Р. 227–235. 3.Deklaraciya pryncypiv tolerantnosti (1995, November 16 [Declaration of principles of tolerance]. Retrieved from: http: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_503 (accessed 23.04.2020). 4.Galyczky`j I. V. (2010). Typy` tolerantnosti v suchasnomu suspilstvi [Types of tolerance in modern society]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. №. 52. Р. 280–289. [in Ukrainian]. 5.Stavyczkyj O. O. (2011). Intolerantnist yak osnovnyj proyav gandykapizmu [Intolerance as a major manifestation of handicapism.] Naukovi zapysky` Nacionalnogo universytetu «Ostrozka akademiya». Seriya: Psyxologiya i pedagogika. №. 18. Р. 230–239. [in Ukrainian]. 6.(2012) Rozsliduvannya zlochyniv, vchynenyx na g`runti neterpymosti: navchalno-praktychnyj posibnyk [Investigation of crimes committed on the basis of intolerance: a practical manual.] Kolektyv avtoriv. Kyiv. 167 р. [in Ukrainian]. 7.Tlumachnyj slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy [Interpretative dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Retrieved from: http://eslovnyk.com/%D1%80%D0% (accessed 23.04.2020). 8. Konvenciya pro zaxyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnyx svobod [Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. (1950, November 4) Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 (accessed 23.04.2020). 9.Kirabaev N. S. Kulturnaya identichnost, plyuralizm i globalizatsiya v sovremennom filosofskom diskurse [Cultural identity, pluralism and globalization in contemporary philosophical discourse] Kulturnaya identichnost' i globalizatsiya: doklady i vystupl. 5-i mezhdunar. filosof. simpozium «Dialog tsivilizatsii: Vostok-Zapad». Retrieved from: http://sociognosis.narod.ru/myweb8/docs/Kirabaev.htm (accessed 23.04.2020). 10. My`xajlova Yu. O. (2015). Organizaciya efektyvnoyi komunikaciyi yak klyuchovogo elementu pidvyshhennya avtorytetu pracivnykiv miliciyi (policiyi) ta nalagodzhennya vzayemodiyi z naselennyam [Organization of effective communication as a key element of increasing the authority of police officers (police) and establishing interaction with the population] Forum prava. № 1. Р. 178–181. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index (accessed 23.04.2020). 11. (2001) Pro kil`kist` ta sklad naselennya Ukrayiny` za pidsumkamy` Vseukrayins`kogo perepy`su naselennya [About the number and composition of the population of Ukraine according to the results of the All-Ukrainian census]. Retrieved from: http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/results/general/nationality (accessed 23.04.2020). 12. (2001) Evropeyskiy kodeks politseyskoy etiki [(2001) European Code of Police Ethics.]. Retrieved from: http://polis.osce.org/library/f/2687/1492/CoE. (accessed 23.04.2020). 13.Bakalchuk V. O. (2010). Tolerantnist do netolerantnosti: problemy proty`diyi neterpy`mosti v Ukrayini [Tolerance to intolerance: problems and protids intolerance in Ukraine] Strategichni priorytety. № 1. Р. 87–93.

Shai R. "Problems of tolerance of law enforcers in modern multicultural society" http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-7-number-327-2020/problems-tolerance-law-enforcers-modern