Administrative and legal means of protection of rights, freedoms and interests of private persons in the sphere of public management

2022;
: 64-69

Melnychenko B. "Administrative and legal means of protection of rights, freedoms and interests of private persons in the sphere of public management."
https://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-9-number-234-2...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Educatinoal and Rasearch Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

The article analyzes the administrative and legal means of protecting the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals in the sphere of public management.  It is noted that in the scientific literature there is no stable, comprehensive and generally accepted formulation of public management. It was found that the definition of public management is approached rather from the standpoint of the actual content of activities or forms that it can take. It was found that public management is carried out by a wide range of  subjects of public management - public authorities, local governments, individuals or collective entities that represent the institution of delegated powers. The term "subjects of public management" is used to describe subjects of public administration. It is established that one of the most fundamental types of administrative and legal relations are those that arise between the subject of public management and an individual. It is stated that the universal institution of protection of legally enshrined rights and interests of citizens is administrative proceedings. It is established that an important place in ensuring the violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens is occupied by administrative means of protection of the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals in the sphere of public management.  It was found that in the administrative and legal literature there are: 1) administrative mediation; 2) administrative appeal; 3) bringing guilty officials of public administration to special disciplinary responsibility; 4) compensation for damage caused by illegal actions (inaction) of public administration entities; 5) means of self-defense - legal means of protest. It is noted that their purpose is to restore the violated right, with the prevention of such offenses in the future. They are carried out in an extrajudicial (administrative) manner. It was emphasized that the creation of an effective system of alternative dispute resolution is one of the important ways to improve the justice system of our country.

1. Bashtannyk, V. V. (2018). Administratyvne pravo. [Administrative Law]. Dnipro : DRIDU NADU [inUkrainian].

2. Kozak, V. I. (2015). Publichne upravlinnia v systemi koordynat ukrainskoi derzhavnosti. [Public management in the coordinate system of Ukrainian statehood]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Lviv. Vyp. 44(1). P. 64–70. [inUkrainian].

3. Melnyk, R. S. (2012). Katehoriia «publichne upravlinnia» u novii interpretatsii. [Category "public management" in a new interpretation]. Pravo i suspilstvo. Dnipro. № 6. P. 95–98. [inUkrainian].

4. Halunko, V., Dikhtiievskyi, P., Kuzmenko, O., Stetsenko, S. and other. (2018). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Povnyi kurs. [Administrative Law of Ukraine. Full course]. Kherson : Oldi-plius [inUkrainian].

5. Paterylo, I. V. (2014). Do rozuminnia sutnosti ta zmistu katehorii «publichna administratsiia». Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu.  [To understand the essence and content of the category "public administration"]. Odesa. Vyp. 9-1. P. 83–85. [inUkrainian].

6. Kolpakov, V. K. (2003). Pro publichni administratsii. [About public administrations]. Pravo Ukrainy. Kyiv. № 5. P. 28–31. [inUkrainian].

7. Melnyk, R. S., Bevzenko, V. M. (2014). Zahalne administratyvne pravo. [General Administrative Law]. Kyiv : Vaite [inUkrainian].

8. Kaplia, O. M. (2017). Realizatsiia pryntsypu efektyvnoho zakhystu prav i svobod osoby v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. [Implementation of the principle of effective protection of individual rights and freedoms in the administrative proceedings of the European Union]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia : Yurysprudentsiia. Odesa. Vyp. 26. P. 27–30. [inUkrainian].

9. Yakovliev, V. V. (2017). Prysudova ta pozasudova mediatsiia: osnovni oznaky. [Judicial and extrajudicial mediation: main features]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody. Seriia : Pravo.  Kharkiv.  Vyp. 26. P. 139–151. [inUkrainian].

10.  Shynkar, T. I. (2017). Osoblyvosti pravovoho zabezpechennia mediatsii v deiakykh zarubizhnykh krainakh: dosvid dlia Ukrainy. [Features of legal support of mediation in some foreign countries: experience for Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http://sd-vp.info/2017/osoblivosti-pravovogo-zabezpechennya-mediatsiyi-v.... (accessed 12.02.2022).

11. Pro zvernennia hromadian: Zakon Ukrainy 1996, № 393/96-VR.

12. Chekhovych, T. (2016) Administratyvne oskarzhennia v systemi zasobiv harantuvannia ta realizatsii pryntsypiv rivnosti pered zakonom u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia. [Administrative appeal in the system of means of guaranteeing and implementing the principles of equality before the law in the sphere of public management]. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. № 6/3. P. 147–153. [inUkrainian].

13. Demkova, M. S., Koba, S. S., Lavrynenko, I. O., Ukrainskyi, D. Ya. (2007). Vidshkoduvannia v pozasudovomu poriadku shkody, zavdanoi derzhavoiu abo orhanamy vlady. [Compensation out of court for damage caused by the state or authorities]. Kyiv : Konus-Yu [inUkrainian].

14. Loshytskyi, M. V. (2015). Administratyvne oskarzhennia yak sposib zakhystu prav hromadian u diialnosti orhaniv publichnoi administratsii.  [Administrative appeal as a way to protect the rights of citizens in the activities of public administration]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia : Pravo. Uzhhorod. Vyp. 31(2).  P. 146–150. [inUkrainian].

15. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy 1996, № 254k/96-VR.

16. Ukrainskyi, D. Ya. (2007). Vidshkoduvannia v administratyvnomu poriadku shkody, zavdanoi diianniamy orhaniv publichnoi administratsii. [Compensation for administrative damage caused by actions of public administration bodies]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. P. 207–211. [inUkrainian].

17. Sereda, V. V. (2014). Dystsyplinarna vidpovidalnist: poniattia, pryntsypy ta vydy. [Disciplinary responsibility: concepts, principles and types[. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. Khmelnytskyi. № 1. P. 18–25. [inUkrainian].

18. Yevropeiska konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny ta osnovnykh svobod vid 4 lystopada 1950 r. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text. (accessed 12.02.2022).

19. Mizhnarodnyi pakt pro hromadianski y politychni prava vid 16 hrudnia 1966 r. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043#Text. (accessed 12.02.2022).