1. MMC
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 9, Number 2, 2022
  4. Field scale computer modeling of soil moisture with dynamic nudging assimilation algorithm

Field scale computer modeling of soil moisture with dynamic nudging assimilation algorithm

MMC.
2022;
Volume 9, Number 2
: pp. 203–216
https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2022.02.203
Received: August 13, 2021
Accepted: February 07, 2022

Mathematical Modeling and Computing, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 203–216 (2022)

Authors:
  1. O. D. Kozhushko
  2. M. V. Boiko
  3. M. Yu. Kovbasa
  4. P. M. Martyniuk
  5. O. M. Stepanchenko
  6. N. V. Uvarov
1
EOS Data Analytics; National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
2
EOS Data Analytics; National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
3
V. Ye. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
4
EOS Data Analytics; National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
5
EOS Data Analytics; National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
6
EOS Data Analytics; G. V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Soil moisture analysis is widely used in numerous practical cases, from weather forecasts to precise agriculture.  Recently, availability of moisture data increased due to the rapid development of satellite image processing.  However, satellite retrievals mostly provide low-resolution surface data.  In this study, we attempt to retrieve surface soil moisture on the field scale using a decomposition algorithm.  Furthermore, we add a mathematical model based on Richards equation to evaluate soil moisture in the root zone.  To combine the results of both models, we employ a nudging data assimilation technique.  Also, a dynamical variation of the method is proposed which makes it more adaptive to the soil type and provides improvement to modeling results.  Two types of numerical experiments are conducted.  Simulation results show reasonably good convergence with the measurements.  The model performs with average correlation of 0.58 on the whole root zone, reaching 0.85 on top soil layers.

data assimilation
Earth remote sensing
Newtonian nudging algorithm
computer modeling
satellite moisture retrieval
soil moisture
  1. Paulik C., Dorigo W., Wagner W., Kidd R.  Validation of the ASCAT Soil Water Index using in situ data from the International Soil Moisture Network.  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 30, 1–8 (2014).
  2. Kedzior M.; Zawadzki J.  Comparative study of soil moisture estimations from SMOS satellite mission, GLDAS database, and cosmic-ray neutrons measurements at COSMOS station in Eastern Poland.  Geoderma. 283, 21–31 (2016).
  3. Mishra V., Ellenburg W. L., Markert K. N., Limaye A. S.  Performance evaluation of soil moisture profile estimation through entropy-based and exponential filter models.  Hydrol. Sci. J. 65 (6), 1036–1048 (2020).
  4. Tian Y., Xiong L., Bin X., Zhuang R.  A prior estimation of the spatial distribution parameter of soil moisture storage capacity using satellite-based root-zone soil moisture data.  Remote Sens. 11, 1–23 (2019).
  5. Guo Z., Dirmeyer P. A.  Evaluation of the Second Global Soil Wetness Project soil moisture simulations: 1. Intermodel comparison.  J. Geophys. Res. 111, D22S02 (2006).
  6. Shellito P. J., Small E. E., Cosh M. H.  Calibration of Noah soil hydraulic property parameters using surface soil moisture from SMOS and Basinwide in situ observations.  J. Hydrometeor. 17, 2275–2292 (2016).
  7. Yang K., Zhu L., Chen Y., Zhao L., Qin J., Lu H., Tang W., Han M., Ding B., Fang N.  Land surface model calibration through microwave data assimilation for improving soil moisture simulations.  Journal of Hydrology. 533, 266–276 (2016).
  8. Jian Z., Huan Q., Li G., Li G.  Parameters estimation and prediction of water movement and solute transport in layered, variably saturated soils using the ensemble Kalman Filter.  Water. 11 (7), 1520 (2019).
  9. Chen W., Shen H., Huang C., Li X.  Improving soil moisture estimation with a dual ensemble Kalman smoother by jointly assimilating AMSR-E brightness temperature and MODIS LST.  Remote Sens. 9, 273 (2017).
  10. Houser P. R., de Lannoy G. J. M., Walker J. P.  Hydrologic data assimilation.  In: Tiefenbacher, J. (Ed.) Approaches to Managing Disaster – Assessing Hazards, Emergencies and Disaster Impacts, pp. 41–64. IntechOpen (2012).
  11. Nearing G., Yatheendradas S., Crow W., Zhan X., Liu J., Chen F.  The efficiency of data assimilation.  Water Resour. Res. 54 (9), 6374–6392 (2018).
  12. Reichle R. H., Koster R. D., Liu P., Mahanama S. P. P., Njoku E. G., Owe M.  Comparison and assimilation of global soil moisture retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) and the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR).  J. Geophys. Res. 112, D09108 (2007).
  13. Musuuza J. L., Gustafsson D., Pimentel R., Crochemore L., Pechlivanidis I.  Impact of satellite and in situ data assimilation on hydrological predictions.  Remote Sens. 12 (5), 811 (2019).
  14. Reichle R. H., Crow W. T., Koster R. D., Sharif H., Mahanama S. P. P.  The contribution of soil moisture retrievals to land data assimilation products.  Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L01404 (2008).
  15. Dong J., Crow W., Reichle R., Liu Q., Lei F., Cosh M.  A global assessment of added value in the SMAP Level-4 soil moisture product relative to its baseline land surface model.  Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6604–6613 (2019).
  16. Rodell M., Houser P. R., Jambor U. E. A., Gottschalck J., Mitchell K., Meng C., Arsenault K., Cosgrove B., Radakovich J., Bosilovich M., Entin J. K., Walker J. P., Lohmann D., Toll D.  The Global Land Data Assimilation System.  Bulletin of American Meteorological Society. 85, 381–394 (2004).
  17. Rains D., Han X., Lievens H., Montzka C., Verhoest N. E. C.  SMOS brightness temperature assimilation into the Community Land Model.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 5929–5951 (2017).
  18. Dan B., Zheng X., Wu G., Li T.  Assimilating shallow soil moisture observations into land models with a water budget constraint.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24 (11) 5187–5201 (2020).
  19. Brocca L., Moramarco T., Melone F., Wagner W., Hasenauer S., Hahn S.  Assimilation of surface- and root-zone ASCAT soil moisture products into rainfall–runoff modeling.  IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens. 50 (7), 2542–2555 (2012).
  20. Bonan B., Albergel C., Zheng Y., Barbu A. L., Fairbairn D., Munier S., Calvet J. S.  An ensemble square root filter for the joint assimilation of surface soil moisture and leaf area index within the Land Data Assimilation System LDAS-Monde: application over the Euro-Mediterranean region.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 325–347 (2020).
  21. Hostache R., Rains D., Mallick K., Chini M., Pelich R., Lievens H., Fenicia F., Corato G., Verhoest N. E. C., Matgen P.  Assimilation of SMOS brightness temperature into a large-scale distributed conceptual hydrological model.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24 (10), 4793–4812 (2019).
  22. De Lannoy G. J. M., Reichle R. H.  Assimilation of SMOS brightness temperatures or soil moisture retrievals into a land surface model.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 4895–4911 (2016).
  23. Kumar S., Peters-Lidard C., Mocko D., Reichle R., Liu Y., Arsenault K., Xia Y., Ek M., Riggs G., Livneh B., Cosh M.  Assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture and snow depth retrievals for drought estimation.  J. Hydrometeor. 15, 2446–2469 (2014).
  24. Lei F., Crow W., Kustas W., Dong J., Yang Y., Knipper Ky., Anderson M., Notarnicola C., Greifeneder F., Mckee L., Alfieri J., Hain C., Dokoozlian N.  Data assimilation of high-resolution thermal and radar remote sensing retrievals for soil moisture monitoring in a drip-irrigated vineyard.  Remote Sens. Environ. 239, 111622 (2020).
  25. Pinnington E., Quaife T., Black E.  Impact of remotely sensed soil moisture and precipitation on soil moisture prediction in a data assimilation system with the JULES land surface model.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 2575–2588 (2018).
  26. Mao Y., Crow W. T., Nijssen B.  Dual state/rainfall correction via soil moisture assimilation for improved streamflow simulation: evaluation of a large-scale implementation with Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite data.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 615–631 (2020).
  27. Martens B., Miralles D. G., Lievens H., van der Schalie R., de Jeu R. A. M., Fern\'{a}ndez-Prieto D., Beck H. E., Dorigo W. A., Verhoest N. E. C.  GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture.  Geoscientific Model Development. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).
  28. Paniconi C., Marrocu M., Putti M., Verbunt M.  Newtonian nudging for a Richards equation-based distributed hydrological model.  Advances in Water Resources. 26, 161–178 (2003).
  29. Houser P. R., Shuttleworth W. J., Famiglietti J. S., Gupta H. V., Syed K. H., Goodrich D. C.  Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation.  Water Resour. Res. 34 (12), 3405–3420 (1998).
  30. Vidard A., le Dimet F. X., Piacentini A.  Optimal determination of nudging coefficients.  Tellus A. 55 (1), 1–15 (2003).
  31. Camporese M., Paniconi C., Putti M., Salandin P.  Comparison of data assimilation techniques for a coupled model of surface and subsurface flow.  Vadose Zone J. 8 (4), 837–845 (2009).
  32. Botto A., Belluco E., Camporese M.  Multi-source data assimilation for physically based hydrological modeling of an experimental hillslope.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 4251–4266 (2018).
  33. Bauser H. H., Berg D., Klein O., Roth K.  Inflation method for ensemble Kalman filter in soil hydrology.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 4921–4934 (2018).
  34. Miroslaw-Swiatek D.  Application of Newtonian nudging data assimilation method in hydrodynamic model of flood flow in the lower Biebrza basin.  Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. 34 (2), 91–105 (2012).
  35. Saito H., Šimůnek J., Mohanty B.  Numerical analyses of coupled water, vapor and heat transport in the vadose zone.  Vadose Zone J. 5 (2), 784–800 (2006).
  36. Šimůnek J., van Genuchten M. Th., Sejna M.  The HYDRUS software package for simulating two- and three dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated porous media.  Technical manual; version 2.0. PC Progress (2012).
  37. Gebler S., Kurtz W., Pauwels V. R. N., Kollet S. J., Vereecken H., Franssen H. J.  Assimilation of high-resolution soil moisture data into an integrated terrestrial model for a small-scale head-water catchment.  Water Resour. Res. 55, 10358–10385 (2019).
  38. Philip J. R., de Vries D. A.  Moisture movement in porous materials under temperature gradients.  Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union. 38 (2), 222–232 (1957).
  39. Schaap M. G., van Genuchten M. Th.  A modified Mualem–van Genuchten formulation for improved description of the hydraulic conductivity near saturation.  Vadose Zone J. 5, 27–34 (2005).
  40. Zhang Y., Schaap M. G.  Weighted recalibration of the Rosetta pedotransfer model with improved estimates of hydraulic parameter distributions and summary statistics (Rosetta3).  Journal of Hydrology. 547, 39–53 (2017).
  41. Sadeghi M., Ghanbarian B., Horton R.  Derivation of an explicit form of the percolation-based effective-medium approximation for thermal conductivity of partially saturated soils.  Water Resour. Res. 54, 1389–1399 (2018).
  42. Xu C.-Y., Singh V. P.  Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland.  Water Resources Management. 16, 197–219 (2002).
  43. Feddes R. A., Kowalik P. T., Zaradny H.  Simulation of field water use and crop yield.  Pudoc (1978).
  44. Samarskiy A. A.  The theory of difference schemes.  Marcel Dekker (2001).
  45. Stauffer D. R., Seaman N. L.  Multiscale four-dimensional data assimilation.  Journal of Applied Meteorology. 33, 416–434 (1994).
  46. Auroux D., Nodet M.  The back and forth nudging algorithm for data assimilation problems: theoretical results on transport equations.  ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations. 18, 318–342 (2012).
  47. Stauffer D. R., Bao J. W.  Optimal determination of nudging coefficients using the adjoint equations.  Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. 45 (5), 358–369 (1993).
  48. Paloscia S., Pettinato S., Santi E., Notarnicola C., Pasolli L., Reppucci A.  Soil moisture mapping using Sentinel-1 images: Algorithm and preliminary validation.  Remote Sens. Environ. 134, 234–248 (2013).
  49. Merzouki A., McNairn H., Pacheco A.  Mapping soil moisture using RADARSAT-2 data and local autocorrelation statistics.  IEEE J. Selected Topics Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 4 (1), 128–137 (2011).
  50. Ponnurangam G. G., Jagdhuber T., Hajnsek I., Rao Y. S.  Soil moisture estimation using hybrid polarimetric SAR Data of RISAT-1.  IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens. 54 (4), 2033–2049 (2016).
  51. Chaubell J., Yueh S., Entekhabi D., Peng J.  Resolution enhancement of SMAP radiometer data using the Backus Gilbert optimum interpolation technique.  2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). 284–287 (2016).
  52. Poe G. A.  Optimum interpolation of imaging microwave radiometer data.  IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens. 28 (5), 800–810 (1990).
  53. Das N. N., Entekhabi D., Scott Dunbar R., Chaubell M. J., Colliander A., Yueh S., Jagdhuber Th., Chen F., Crow W., O'Neill P. E., Walker J. P., Berg A., Bosch D. D., Caldwell T., Cosh M. H., Collins Ch. H., Lopez-Baeza E., Thibeault M.  The SMAP and Copernicus Sentinel 1A/B microwave active-passive high resolution surface soil moisture product.  Remote Sens. Environ. 233, 111380 (2019).
  54. Holmes T. R. H., de Jeu R. A. M., Owe M., Dolman A. J.  Land surface temperature from Ka band (37 GHz) passive microwave observations.  J. Geophys. Res. 114, D04113 (2009).
  55. Chan S., Bindlish R., O'Neill P., Njoku E., Jackson T., Colliander A., Chen F., Burgin M., Dunbar S., Piepmeier J., Yueh S., Entekhabi D., Cosh M., Caldwell T., Walker J., Wu X., Berg A., Rowlandson T., Pacheco A., Kerr Y.  Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product.  IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens. 54, 1–14 (2016).
  56. Mironov V. L., Kerr Y., Wigneron J.-P., Kosolapova L., Demontoux F.  Temperature- and texture-dependent dielectric model for moist soils at 1.4 GHz.  IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. 10, 419–423 (2013).
  57. Peplinski N. R., Ulaby F. T., Dobson M. C.  Dielectric properties of soils in the 0.3-1.3-GHz range.  IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens. 33 (3), 803–807 (1995).
  58. Dorigo W., Wagner W., Hohensinn R., Hahn S., Paulik C., Xaver A., Gruber A., Drusch M., Mecklenburg S., Oevelen P., Robock A., Jackson T.  The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements.  Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 1675–1698 (2011).
  59. Hersbach H., de Rosnay P., Bell B., Schepers D., Simmons A., Soci C., Abdalla S., Alonso-Balmaseda M., Balsamo G., Bechtold P., Berrisford P., Bidlot J.-R., de Boisseson E., Bonavita M., Browne P., Buizza R., Dahlgren P., Dee D., Dragani R., Diamantakis M., Flemming J., Forbes R., Geer A. J., Haiden T., Holm E., Haimberger L., Hogan R., Horanyi A., Janiskova M., Laloyaux P., Lopez P., Munoz-Sabater J., Peubey C., Radu R., Richardson D., Thepaut J.-N., Vitart F., Yang X., Zsoter E., Zuo H.  Operational global reanalysis: progress, future directions and synergies with NWP.  ERA Report 27 (2018).
  60. Kozhushko O., Boiko M., Kovbasa M., Martyniuk P., Stepanchenko O., Uvarov M.  Evaluation of the soil moisture model with data assimilation by the triple collocation method.  Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference. 4, 35–38 (2020).