1. SHV
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 7, Number 1, 2021
  4. Evaluation of EU Activities to Strengthen Democracy in Member States of the Last Waves of Enlargement (Review Article)

Evaluation of EU Activities to Strengthen Democracy in Member States of the Last Waves of Enlargement (Review Article)

SHV.
2021;
Volume 7, Number 1
: 10-16
https://doi.org/10.23939/shv2021.01.010
Received: March 14, 2021
Accepted: April 20, 2021
Authors:
  1. Nataliia Khoma
  2. Ihor Vdovychyn
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

The article’s purpose is to assess the effectiveness of EU policies concerning strengthen the quality of democracy in the member states. The research methods are aimed at proving the hypothesis about a decrease in impact (initiatives, control, etc.) of EU institutions on deepening democratic modernization, as a result of a discrepancy on debatable issues between the “young” democracies of the EU (like the Baltic States) and the liberal democratic course of the EU. The research is based on the methodology of neo-institutionalism, value approach and political comparative studies.

The results of the study have led to the conclusion that the current goals of the EU are not sufficiently focused on the issue of the quality of democracy in the member states. The need to revitalize the EU in the direction of monitoring the observance of democratic standards is explained by the stagnation/regression of the quality of democracy in these states of the latest EU expansion. The actions of EU institutions in relation to member states, where stagnation/regression of democracy has been manifested, were assessed as inappropriate regarding the possible consequences of this destructive process. Insufficient attention by the EU to strengthening its values on which the EU is based was noted, that is seen as the main reason for the current deterioration in the quality of democracy. The urgency of this new format for European democracy, of really effective mechanisms for ensuring its quality was stated. The authors mentioned a number of open questions that require further study, in particular:

  1. are EU initiatives able to reduce the democratic deficit in its member states?;
  2. how strong should the EU's control be over the observance of these standards and values of democracy so that it does not contradict the principles of democracy?

Attention is drawn to the need of further clarifying these mechanisms which the EU should implement in relation to its member states in order to strengthen the quality of national democratic political systems.

democracy
EU
defects of democracy
quality of democracy
  1. Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27 (1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
  2. Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13 (1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0003
  3. Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., Hanley, S. (2018). Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics, 34 (3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1491401
  4. Dawson, J., Hanley, S. (2016). What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”. Journal of Democracy, 27 (1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0015
  5. Democracy Facing Global Challenges. V-Dem Annual Democracy. (2019). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
  6. Democracy for All? The V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2018. (2018). Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg.
  7. Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26 (1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009
  8. Dimitrova, A. L. (2010). The New Member States of the EU in the Aftermath of Enlargement: Do New European Rules remain Empty Shells? Journal of European Public Policy, 17 (1), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903464929
  9. Dimitrova, A., Pridham, G. (2004). International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: the Integration Model and Its Limits. Democratization, 11 (5), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304606
  10. Eriksen, E. O., Fossum, J. E. (2012). Rethinking Democracy and the European Union. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203138083
  11. Fotopoulos, S. (2019). What Sort of Changes did the Spitzenkandidat Process Bring to the Quality of the EU’s Democracy? European View, 18 (2), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819879862
  12. Godfrey, K., Youngs, R. (2019). Toward a New EU Democracy Strategy. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  13. Müller, J.‐W. (2015). Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States? European Law Journal, 21 (2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12124
  14. Raine, S. (2019). Europe’s Strategic Future: From Crisis to Coherence?Abingdon: Routledge for the International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367823702
  15. Scheppele, K. L., Kochenov, D., Grabowska-Moroz, B. (2020). EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement B. Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/yel/advance-article/doi/10.1093/yel/yeaa012/6064852? searchresult=1  https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaa012
  16. The Rome Declaration (2017). Council of the EU. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/03/25/rome-declaration/pdf
  17. The Sibiu Declaration. (2019). Council of the EU. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/05/09/the-sibiu-declaration/#