Purpose of the research. Exploration of the research gaps in order to understand how DAOs can encourage initiatives/practices to protect the interests of various stakeholders as well as identifying and comparing the main problems and prospects for creating and scaling DAOs in the existing economic realities. The following hypotheses that DAO is a form of science-oriented entrepreneurship and creates opportunities for involving unused entities in diverse economic processes were analyzed.
Methods of the research. The formation and justification of the theoretical basis of the research are carried out through a review of current literature sources. The hypothesis testing, measuring the advantages and disadvantages of DAO were implemented by combining qualitative analysis (structuring, benchmarking, identifying weaknesses and strengths) and quantitative analysis (three-dimensional matrix: structural blocks, advantages/disadvantages, criteria for inclusivity/science orientation). The advantages and disadvantages of the DAO were divided into structural blocks: leadership, team, management, and external challenges.
Results. Tokens are the most universal equivalent of both ownership and rights, as well as work performed for DAO. Decision-making is carried out on the basis of token ownership. Depending on the flexibility, the rights of token holders may be predetermined or provided for the possibility of making changes. Depending on the direction of activity of the DAO, tokens give grounds to invest, manage, create and promote. The material availability of the token (earn or buy) affects the degree of coverage of potential stakeholders of the DAO project (the level of inclusivity). The technical availability of the token is related to the concept of science-oriented entrepreneurship (the level of technical skills and knowledge that must be possessed to attract DAO to its activities). Inclusivity is more often reflected in the advantages of the DAO. The very principles of functioning and management of the DAO imply a high level of engagement, as well as the most equal opportunities for blockchain technology enthusiasts. The development of the research and competence component in entrepreneurship is particularly relevant for the implementation and use of DAO projects. Science orientation is mainly associated with the priority of professional and technical skills for interaction with the external ecosystem (universities, consulting agencies, technology companies).
Practical value/originality. The algorithm for creating and functioning DAO is based on the principle of inclusivity. Such advantages of the DAO as lack of hierarchy, earned leadership, responsibility for the work done, collective decision-making, transparency of management ensure maximum involvement of motivated participants and fair development opportunities. The criterion of science orientation is mainly revealed in the disadvantages of the DAO. There are potential restrictions on scaling DAO projects precisely at the level of professional and technical skills of participants. The active implementation of DAO in business activities is associated with the risks of insufficient skills and knowledge of interested parties.
1. Swan M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol. 2015.
2. van Rijmenam M., Erekhinskaya T., Schweitzer J., Williams M.-A. Avoid being the Turkey: How big data analytics changes the game of strategy in times of ambiguity and uncertainty. Long Range Planning. 2018. 52(5).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.007
DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.007.
3. Vergne J. Decentralized vs. Distributed Organization: Blockchain, Machine Learning and the Future of the Digital Platform. Organization Theory. 2020. 1(4). DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720977052.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720977052
4. Buterin V. A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. 2014. URL: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper.
5. Arruñada B., Garicano L. Blockchain: The Birth of Decentralized Governance. Pompeu Fabra University, Economics and Business Working Paper Series. 2018. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160070.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160070
6. Santana C., Albareda L. Blockchain and the emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022. Vol. 182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121806
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121806.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121806
7. Tamai S., Kasahara S. DAO voting mechanism resistant to whale and collusion problems. Front. Blockchain. 2024. 7. DOI 10.3389/fbloc.2024.1405516.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2024.1405516
8. DAOs are not corporations: where decentralization in autonomous organizations matters. URL: https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2022/09/20/daos.html.
9. Glaveski S. How DAOs could change the way we work. 2022. URL: https://hbr.org/2022/04/how-daos-could-change-the-way-we-work.
10. Saurabh K., Rani N., Upadhyay P. Towards novel blockchain decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO) led corporate governance framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024. Vol. 204. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123417
11. Valiente M.-C., Pavón J. Web3-DAO: An ontology for decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Web Semantics. 2024. Vol. 82. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2024.100830.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2024.100830
12. Gupta P. 5 ways web3 is making positive social impact. 2023. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/en-in/news-and-trends/5-ways-how-web3-is-ma....
13. Brown C. What the rise and fall of crypto can teach us about managing distributed teams. 2023. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/leadership/what-the-rise-and-fall-of-crypto....
14. Boder R. DAOs are the future for business, here's why. 2022. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/leadership/how-daos-can-transform-the-busin....
15. Kramarenko A. Inclusive and sustainable growth: factors, stakeholders, problems and solutions. Managing The Interaction of Stakeholders In Ensuring Sustainable Development of Territories : collective monograph. 2021. Kharkiv : LTD "Typography Madrid", 57-75. URL: http://dspace.univer.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/17587.
16. Chernikova A. How DAOs are changing leadership. 2022. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/leadership/how-daos-are-changing-leadership....
17. Yahya A. The long-tail problem in AI, and how autonomous markets can solve it. 2020. URL: https://a16z.com/2020/07/24/long-tail-problem-in-a-i.
18. Werbach K. The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11449.001.0001
19. Wang F., De Filippi P. Self-sovereign identity in a globalized world: Credentials-based identity systems as a driver for economic inclusion. Frontiers in Blockchain. 2020. 2. 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00028
20. Puranam P. The Microstructure of Organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672363.001.0001
21. Narula N. The architecture of crypto innovation. 2019. URL: https://a16z.com/2019/08/29/architecture-of-crypto-innovation-crypto-reg....
22. Murray A., Kuban S., Josefy M., Anderson J. Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0066.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0066