1. SISN
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 17, 2025
  4. Synthesis of a Macromodel for a Virtual Signal Simulator of Adaptive Acoustics

Synthesis of a Macromodel for a Virtual Signal Simulator of Adaptive Acoustics

SISN.
2025;
Volume 17
: pp. 203 - 213
https://doi.org/10.23939/sisn2025.17.203
Authors:
  1. Mykhaylo Melnyk
  2. Roman Holyaka
  3. Andriy Kernytskyy
  4. Roman Vynarovych
  5. Mykhailo Shvarts
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University Department of Computer Design Systems, Lviv, Ukraine
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Computer Design Systems, Lviv, Ukraine
3
Lviv Polytechnic National University Department of Computer Design Systems, Lviv, Ukraine
4
Lviv Polytechnic National University Department of Computer Design Systems, Lviv, Ukraine
5
Lviv Polytechnic National University Department of Computer Design Systems, Lviv, Ukraine

This work is dedicated to the development of a macromodel for the virtual signal simulator of adaptive acoustics, Data@Sim, based on the formal analogy method. The structure of modeling electro- acoustic processes in adaptive acoustics tasks and approaches to the unification of research on electrical and acoustic signals are presented. An algorithm for synthesizing virtual signals that accounts for temporal parameters of sound wave propagation and attenuation, as well as noise and interference effects, is proposed. The model is implemented in the SPICE environment and enables verification of measurement transformations used in acoustic metrology systems. The conducted analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach for modeling the acoustic environment and optimizing digital processing methods for acoustic signals.

adaptive acoustics
modeling
formal analogy
SPICE
virtual signals
Digital processing
  1. Aouzale, N., Chitnalah, A., & Jakjoud, H. (2009). Experimental validation of SPICE modeling diffraction effects in a pulse–echo ultrasonic system. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 56(12), 911–915. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2009.2035276
  2. Chandrasekar, J., Liu, L., Patt, D., Friedmann, P. P., & Bernstein, D. S. (2006). Adaptive harmonic steady-state control for disturbance rejection. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 14(6), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2006.880185
  3. Cox, P. T., & Song, B. (2001). A formal model for component-based software. Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995278
  4. Da Silva, C. E., Medeiros, L., Justino, Y., & Gomes, E. L. (2022). A Box Analogy Technique (BoAT) for agile- based modelling of business processes. 2022 IEEE 30th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 231–242.    https://doi.org/10.1109/RE54965.2022.00029
  5. Dayong, N., Hongyu, S., Aoyu, X., Yongjun, G., Hongwei, D., & Jiaoyi, H. (2020). Adaptive noise reduction method of synchronous hydraulic motor acoustic signal based on improved dislocation superposition method. IEEE Access, 8, 37161–37172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975562
  6. Galloy, L., Berquez, L., Baudoin, F., & Payan, D. (2014). PSpice modeling of the pulsed electro-acoustic signal. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 21(3), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2014.6832259
  7. Graves, C. A., Negrón, T. P., Chestnut II, M., & Popoola, G. (2015). Studying smart spaces using an "embiquitous" computing analogy. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 14(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2015.41
  8. Guerreiro, J., Reid, A., Jackson, J. C., & Windmill, J. F. C. (2017). Towards the development of a frequency agile MEMS acoustic sensor system. IEEE Sensors, 120, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsens.2017.8234395
  9. He, H., Chen, J., Benesty, J., & Yu, Y. (2020). Robust Frequency-Domain Recursive Least M-Estimate Adaptive Filter For Acoustic System Identification. ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9054296
  10. Jesus, R. C. O., Carvalho, E. A. N., Tamarin, O., Freire, R. C. S., & Dejous, C. (2021). Evaluation of an equivalent circuit model for simulation of surface acoustic wave sensors. 2021 5th International Symposium on Instrumentation Systems, Circuits and Transducers (INSCIT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INSCIT49950.2021.9557258
  11. Kawamura, N., & Hasegawa, M. (2018). Suppression of acoustic noise of position sensorless adaptive positioning servo system based on DyCE principle. 2018 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPEEDAM.2018.8445353
  12. Krishna Vemuri, S. H., Ganguly, A., & Panahi, I. (2014). Real-time active noise control of multi-tones and MRI acoustic noise in fMRI bore with signal decomposition and parallel hybrid RLS-NLMS adaptive algorithms. 2014 IEEE Dallas Circuits and Systems Conference (DCAS), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCAS.2014.6965339
  13. Li, J., Nichols, D., & Terry, A. (2005). Analogy, deduction and learning. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 294a–294a. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.96
  14. Martin, R., & Kolossa, D. (2012). Voice Activity Detection, Noise Estimation, and Adaptive Filters for Acoustic Signal Enhancement. 51–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118392683.ch4
  15. Mayo, J. R., Armstrong, R. C., & Hulette, G. C. (2015). Digital system robustness via design constraints: The lesson of formal methods. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), 109–114.    https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon.2015.7116737
  16. O'Rourke, R. (2024). Opamp models and resistive circuits. In First and second order circuits and equations: Technical background and insights (pp. 39–43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119913566.ch3
  17. Sarpiri, M. N., Aghaei, M. S., & Gandomani, T. J. (2023). Towards better software development effort estimation with analogy-based approach and nature-based algorithms. 2023 I nternational Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT58056.2023.10225939
  18. Vary, P., & Martin, R. (2024). Acoustic echo control. In Digital speech transmission and enhancement (pp. 457– 515). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119060970.ch14
  19. Viegas, R., Pozzatti, D., Zabel, F., & Silva, A. J. (2022). Integrated approach for modeling acoustic propagation and        projectors/hydrophones        electronics.        OCEANS        2022,        Hampton        Roads,        1–6.ttps://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS47191.2022.9977091