The article examines the phenomenon of liminality as an analytical framework for understanding urban transformations in the context of post-industrial development. The study focuses on socio-cultural, morphological, and ecological dimensions of change. The research problem arises from the increasing number of urbanized areas that have lost their original functional roles and no longer align with traditional zoning principles or typological classifications. In this context, the article foregrounds the need for both theoretical and practical rethinking of urban spaces that exist in a state of in-betweenness – so-called liminal spaces.
The article emphasizes that liminal spaces, such as temporarily abandoned, transitional, or peripheral zones, are acquiring new meanings and potentials that transcend functional rationalism. In this context, particular attention is given to two large-scale case studies: HafenCity in Hamburg (Germany) and King’s Cross in London (United Kingdom), which exemplify sustainable models of reimagining post-industrial territories by integrating cultural, commercial, residential, and public functions. Additionally, the article examines green urban spaces, specifically Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord and the High Line Park, as examples that demonstrate the significance of an ecological design approach aimed at revitalizing the urban landscape.
The aim of the article is to justify the relevance of applying the concept of liminality as an analytical approach to interpreting urban transformations, using the example of post-industrial and green urban spaces. The conclusions emphasize that liminal spaces are not only indicators of urban dysfunction or decline but also markers of areas with significant transformational potential, requiring interdisciplinary reflection and flexible strategies for reconstruction and modernization.
Augé M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso. (Original work published 1992)
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places. non-placesintroduction to ananthropology ofsupermodernity. Translated by John Howe. London·- New York: VERSO
Barron P. and Mariani M. (2013). Terrain Vague. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552172
Castells M. (1996). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). Blackwell.
Diel A. and Lewis M. (2022). Structural deviations drive an uncanny valley of physical places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101844
Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875001
Gennep A. van (2019). The Rites of Passage, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press.
Graham H. (2024). Regen X: the £3 billion making of King’s Cross. [online] Thetimes.com. Available at: <https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/property-home/article/regen-x-the-3-... [8 May 2025].
Hafencity (2022). HafenCity and its development in figures. Facts & figures. [online] Available at: <https://www.hafencity.com/en/overview/facts-figures?utm_source=chatgpt.com> [8 May 2025].
Harvey D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell.
Harvey D. (2000). Spaces of hope. University of California Press.
Heft P. (2021). Betwixt and Between: Zones as Liminal and Deterritorialized Spaces. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).
Latz P. (2001). Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord: The metamorphosis of an industrial site. In: Waldheim, C. (ed.), The Landscape Urbanism Reader. Princeton Architectural Press.
Lefebvre H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
Moore R. (2024). ‘Nervous of its own boldness’: the (almost) radical rebirth of King’s Cross. [online] the Guardian. Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2024/apr/28/the-almost-radical-... [8 May 2025].
Praticò A. (2015). The analysis of the new strategic area of Hamburg: the redevelopment project of the Hafencity’s waterfront. [online] Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306518132_The_analysis_of_the_new_strategic_area_of_Hamburg_the_redevelopment_project_of_the_Hafencity's_waterfront> [8 May 2025].
Prévio E. (2020). Terrain vague de ignasi by sola-morales. [online] Available at: <https://www.estudoprevio.net/terrain-vague-de-ignasi-by-sola-morales/?la... [6 May 2025].
Soja E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Soja E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell.
Sosnova N. (2016). Lviv public spaces of the 18th –19th centuries. Architectural Studies, 2(2), 203-209.
Sosnova N. (2018). The use of the B. Hillier’s method for the significant city public space analysis. Architectural Studies, 4 (2). Editor -in-Chief B. Cherkes. Lviv. Р. 282–288.
Terragni E., Corner J. & Diller Scofidio + Renfro (2015). The High Line : Foreseen, Unforeseen. London: Phaidon ; New York, N.Y.
Turner V. (1969). Ritual Process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge.