The increasing importance of ensuring high-quality distributed information resources in the context of modern technologies necessitates the definition of effective quality assessment systems and measurement scales. This work explores the essential quality criteria for distributed information resources, including reliability, performance, scalability, security, interoperability, usability, management, and monitoring. Various assessment systems, such as ISO/IEC 25010, CMMI, COBIT, ITIL, and NIST, are analyzed for their applicability to different quality parameters. Additionally, the study examines the use of nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio scales within these systems, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Recommendations are provided for selecting and implementing appropriate quality assessment systems and scales, with particular emphasis on the unique characteristics of distributed information resources. Reviewed some risks, challenges, tasks and advantages of developing a dedicated quality assessment system for distributed resources quality assessment. The conclusions drawn underline the effectiveness of different systems and scales in enhancing resource quality, while also suggesting directions for further research in this domain.
- Alshar'e, M. (2023). Cyber security framework selection: Comparision of NIST and ISO27001. Applied computing Journal, 245-255.
- Bahmani, A., Alavi, A., Buergel, T., Upadhyayula, S., Wang, Q., Ananthakrishnan, S. K., ... & Snyder, M. P. (2021). A scalable, secure, and interoperable platform for deep data-driven health management. Nature communications, 12(1), 5757.
- Dalati, S. (2018). Measurement and Measurement Scales. Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment: Methodologies and Cases in Business Research, 79-96.
- De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., Joshi, A., Huygh, T. (2020). COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT. In: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25918-1_5.
- Estdale, J., Georgiadou, E. (2018). Applying the ISO/IEC 25010 Quality Models to Software Product. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 896. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_42.
- Hidayati, B. Purwandari, E. K. Budiardjo and I. Solichah, "Global Software Development and Capability Maturity Model Integration: A Systematic Literature Review," 2018 Third International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Palembang, Indonesia, 2018, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IAC.2018.8780489.
- Kahloun, F., Ayachi Ghannouchi, S. (2018). A Classification Algorithm for Assessing the Quality Criteria for Business Process Models. In: Abraham, A., Muhuri, P., Muda, A., Gandhi, N. (eds) Hybrid Intelligent Systems. HIS 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 734. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-76351-4_8
- Rusman, A., Nadlifatin, R., & Subriadi, A. P. (2022). Information system audit using COBIT and ITIL framework: literature review. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika, 6(3), 799-810.
- Saneii, S. H., & Doosti, H. (2024). Measuring Scales. In Practical Biostatistics for Medical and Health Sciences (pp. 1-9). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.