1. SISN
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 18, 2025
  4. Multifactor Positioning Model of the Object of Software Products' Comprehensive Support

Multifactor Positioning Model of the Object of Software Products' Comprehensive Support

SISN.
2025;
Volume 18
: pp. 1 - 14
Authors:
  1. Andrii Pukach
  2. Vasyl Teslyuk
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Automated Control Systems
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

The scientific and applied problem of positioning the support objects (of software products’ comprehensive support) in relation to the relevant impact factors (within the existing polysubject environments of complex support) is considered in the context of a more global scientific and applied problem of automation and intellectualization of balancing the environments of software products’ comprehensive support. The object of the study is the process of multifactor positioning of the support object (of software products’ comprehensive support). The subject of the research are methods and means of mathematical, heuristic and computer modeling. The aim of the research is to develop a multifactor positioning model of the support object of software products' comprehensive support. In order to achieve the set goal, the necessary research tasks, presented below in the text, have been solved. In particular, a comprehensive analysis has been carried out for the problematic(s) of such fundamental components as: comprehensive support, object of support, subjects of support, impact factors, and support environment. Thereby, a relation(s) has been established between each of these fundamental components in order to take into account their relevance in the context of the researched pro- blem/issue(s). At the final stage, a multifactor positioning model of the object of software products' comprehensive support has been developed, that provides the possibility of solving the initial stage of the problem of balancing environments (of software products’ comprehensive support), namely the positioning problem. The developed model acts as a basic positioning mechanism using a polar and/or Cartesian coordinate system, providing possibilities for further modelling and research into possible path(s) and way(s) for further potential development, adaptation, refinement(s), and improvement(s). As a practical approbation of the developed model, the relevant practical applied task of calculating the tendency of the displacement dynamics of the support object relative to the given specific impact factor (within the existing support environment) has been solved and presented in scope of this research.

software product
comprehensive support
support object
impact factors
positioning
mode
  1. Alam, K.R., Barua, C. & Kabir, J.U.Z. (2025). The Future of Agile: Utilizing AI Together with Machine Study to Support Real Time Project Control and Modifying Decision Making. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(1), 1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14792219
  2. Ale, N. K. (2024). Enhancing Test Automation with Deep Learning: Techniques, Challenges and Future Prospects. Computer Science & Information Technology, vol.14, pp.59–70. https://doi.org/10.5121/ csit.2024.141505
  3. Anbalagan, K. (2024). Cloud DevOps and Generative AI: Revolutionizing Software Development and Operations. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 13(8), 15172- 15181. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karthikeyan-Anbalagan-2/publication/385131074_Clo- ud_DevOps_and_Generative_AI_Revolutionizing_Software_Development_and_Operations/links/671797a bd796f96b8ecae06d/Cloud-DevOps-and-Generative-AI-Revolutionizing-Software-Development-and-Ope- rations.pdf
  4. Betru, B., & Getahun, F. (2023). Ontology-driven Intelligent IT Incident Management Model. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 15(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10. 5815/ijitcs.2023.01.04
  5. Chittala, S. (2024). AIOps and DevOps: Catalysts of Digital Transformation in the Age of Automated Operations. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(6), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT24106163
  6. Desmond, O.C. (2024). The Convergence of AI and DevOps: Exploring Adaptive Automation and Proactive System Reliability. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 12(9), 11310-11325. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388563829_The_Con- vergence_of_AI_and_DevOps_Exploring_Adaptive_Automation_and_Proactive_System_Reliability
  7. Erman, A. M., & Fawareh, H. (2020). Impact Cultural-Quality Factors on Successes and Failures Software System. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(5), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/26852020
  8. Eze, М., & Okunbor, С. (2021). Analytical study of software development process model variants. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 8(2), 023–031. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2021.8.2.0111
  9. Hayat, A., Sunriz Islam, & Hossain, F. (2024). The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Software Testing: Prospects and Challenges. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi. org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.14783
  10. Li, T., Wan, K., Wu, Z., Cao, Q., & Zheng, X. (2022). Capo: Calibrating Device-to-Device Positioning in Heterogeneous Systems. Research Square (Research Square). pp.1-26. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs- 1570788/v1
  11. Lichter, H. (2012). Software Processes in an Agile World. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications, 6(21), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.4156/jdcta.vol6.issue21.2
  12. Lingras, S. & Basu, A. (2025). Modernizing the ASPICE Software Engineering Base Practices Framework: Integrating Alternative Technologies for Agile Automotive Software Development. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 13(01), 1880-1901.  URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adebis- Samuel/publication/388821959_Modernizing_the_ASPICE_Software_Engineering_Base_Practices_Frame- work_Integrating_Alternative_Technologies_for_Agile_Automotive_Software_Development/links/67a7aaa920 7c0c20fa7ed983/Modernizing-the-ASPICE-Software-Engineering-Base-Practices-Framework-Integrating-Al- ternative-Technologies-for-Agile-Automotive-Software-Development.pdf
  13. Machuca-Villegas, L., Gasca-Hurtado, G. P., Puente, S. M., & Tamayo, L. M. R. (2021). An Instrument for Measuring Perception about Social and Human Factors that Influence Software Development Productivity. JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science, 27(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.65102
  14. Miller, A., Giachetti, R., & Van Bossuyt, D. (2022). Challenges of Adopting DevOps for Combat Systems Development Environment. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 29(99), 22–48. https://doi.org/10. 22594/dau.21-870.29.01
  15. Minciu, O.-A., Iacob, I.-L., Ionita, A.-D. & Mocanu, S. (2022). Continuous Integration environment deployment. Romanian Journal of Information Technology and Automatic Control, 32(2), 79–92. https://doi. org/10.33436/v32i2y202206
  16. Moheel, B., Alkatheri, S., & AlSukhayri, A. (2019). Critical Success Factors of Total Quality Management in Software Development. IARJSET, 6(2), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.17148/iarjset.2019.6208
  17. Oliveira, E., Conte, T., Cristo, M., & Valentim, N. (2018). Influence Factors in Software Productivity - A Tertiary Literature Review. International Conferences on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2018, 68–103. https://doi.org/10.18293/seke2018-149
  18. Pandy, G., Pugazhenthi, V.J., & Murugan, A. (2024). Advances in Software Testing in 2024: Experimental Insights, Frameworks, and Future Directions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJARCCE), 13(11), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2024.131103
  19. Paramesh, S.P., & Shreedhara, K.S. (2021). Leveraging the Text Mining to Automate the Customer Helpdesk Systems. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(17), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.5120/ ijca2021921519
  20. Pukach, A. I., & Teslyuk, V. M. (2025). Method of forming multifactor portraits of the subjects supporting software complexes, using a multilayer perceptron. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2025-1-12
  21. Radwan, A. M., Abdel-Fattah, M. A., & Mohamed, W. (2024). AI-Driven Prioritization Techniques of Requirements in Agile Methodologies: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(9), 812-823. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150983
  22. Rajkumar, S. (2023). Designing A Cloud-Based Software Testing Environment For Enhancing The Reliability Of Distributed Systems. International Journal of Advance and Applied Research, 12(1), 182-193. URL: https://yra.ijaar.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/120126.pdf
  23. Tohoiev, O., Burlachenko, I., Zhuravska, I., & Savinov V. (2020). The monitoring system based on a multi-agent approach for moving objects positioning in wireless networks, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2608, pp. 79–90. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2608/paper7.pdf
  24. Wang, Q., Shwartz, L., Grabarnik, G. Ya., Nidd, M., & Hwang, J. (2019). Leveraging AI in Service Automation Modeling: From Classical AI Through Deep Learning to Combination Models. Service-Oriented Computing, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33702-5_14