MEDIA COMPONENT OF CONTEMPORARY LITTERATURE AND LITERARY CRITICISM

2022;
: 89-98
1
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
2
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

The specifics of coverage of literary and literary-critical topics in specialized magazines (“Literaturna Ukrayina”, “Ukrayinsʹka literaturna hazeta”) and magazines of social and cultural issues (“Krytyka”, “Zbruč”) are considered. The current stage of development of literary magazines and literary sections of publications is considered to be due to the logic of dialogue between traditional and modern trends in the literary-critical field of modern Ukrainian humanities. The repetition of some key issues in the discussion “modern – traditional” at the turn of the XIX–XX and XX–XXI centuries suggests the “return” of Ukrainian literature to the path of development, which is determined by its cultural specifics. Literary magazines allow to maintain a certain level of discussion in the process of understanding the literary heritage of the twentieth century, revolutionary changes in modern literature, defining tasks for writers. Conversations, dialogues, conversations become a logical genre embodiment of this process (Yuriy Andrukhovych, Oleksandr Boychenko, Orest Drulʹ “Vorokhtararium: literary trialogue with dialogue and monologues”, “Vorokhtarium: literaturnyy trialoh z dialohom i monolohamy”, 2017; Lesya Ukrayinka, Oksana Zabuzhko, Blazhennishyy Svyatoslav Shevchuk about Lesya Ukrainka, “Apokryf. Chotyry rozmovy pro Lesyu Ukrayinku”, 2020; “Conversations. Mykhailo Sydorzhevsky – Hryhoriy Shton”, “Besidy. Mykhaylo Sydorzhevsʹkyy – Hryhoriy Shtonʹ”, 2020). The analyzed editions and stylistic specifics of critical texts illustrate the dynamism of the literarycritical process, allow to present an intellectual “portrait” of the reader interested in modern literature. Comparing the genre and stylistic characteristics of the texts of the Ukrainian Literary Newspaper and the materials of the Zbruč publication requires a distinction between the concepts of worldview journalism, which usually belongs to writers, and literary criticism by literary critics and journalists.

1. Mitchuk, O., Kharamurza, D. (2021). Literaturna krytyka v onlain-media. InterConf, (78), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.7-8.10.2021.023.

2. Ohar, E. I. (2020). Knyzhkovi internet-media v konteksti kulturnoi zhurnalistyky. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Sotsialni komunikatsii, (2), 56–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2020.2(42).8.

3. Bukina, N. V. (2021). Vitchyzniana literaturna krytyka yak sehment virtualnoho kulturnoho prostoru: internet-vydannia, personalii, zhanry. Intehratsiia osvity, nauky ta biznesu v suchasnomu seredovyshchi: zymovi dysputy: tezy dop. II Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konferentsii. Dnipro. (1), 223.

4. Bucharska, I.S. (2020). “Literaturna Ukraina”, “Ukrainska literaturna hazeta”: sohodennia trendiv mynuloho. Aktualni trendy suchasnoho komunikatyvnoho prostoru : kolektyvna monohrafiia. Dnipro : Hrani, 44–53.

5. Kostetska, L. (2017). Suchasna literaturna krytyka v konteksti zhurnalistyky. Naukovyi visnyk MNU im. V. O. Sukhomlynskoho. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky (Literaturoznavstvo), 118–122.

6. Krytyka. Access mode: https://krytyka.com/ua/.

7. Zbruč. Access mode: https://zbruc.eu/.

8. Temchenko, L. V., Bucharska, I. S. (2021). Svitohliadna publitsystyka: vid zbirky “Nervy lantsiuha” (2003) do Zbruc-eseistyky. Derzhava i rehiony. Seriia : Sotsialni komunikatsii, 2 (46), 63–70.

9. Literaturna Ukraina. Access mode: https://litukraina.com.ua/.

10. Ukrainska literaturna hazeta. Access mode: https://litukraina.com.ua/.

11. Pitiakova, T. (2017). Problema tradytsii v khudozhnii praktytsi doby modernu – perekhodu do postmodernu. Universytetska kafedra. Kulturolohiia. Aksiolohiia. Filosofiia. Etnolohiia. Dyskusii. Retsenzii. Anotatsii, 6, 15–28.

12. Hundorova, T. (2009). ProIavlennia slova: dyskursiia rannoho ukrainskoho modernizmu. Kyiv : Krytyka.

13. Pavlychko, S. (2002). Teoriia literatury. Kyiv : Osnovy.

14. Zerov, M. (2003). Vystup na dysputi “Shliakhy rozvytku suchasnoi literatury”. Nove ukrainske pysmenstvo. Kyiv : Osnovy.

15. Hasanova, V. T. (2001). Osnovni orhanizatsiini etapy ukrainskoho literaturnoho vidrodzhennia 20-kh rokiv. Kultura narodov Prychernomoria, 21, 154-158.

16. Hosking, G. (2000). Beyond Socialist Realism: Soviet Fiction since Ivan Denisovsch. Sotsrealystycheskyi kanon. Sankt-Peterburh : Akademycheskyi proekt, 242–248.

17. Hundorova, T. (2021). Lesia Ukrainka i Olha Kobylianska: “shchos take, chomu nazvy nema v liudskii movi”. Zbruč. 21.02.2021. Access mode: https://zbruc.eu/node/103415.

18. Hundorova, T. (2021). “Donka” Drahomanova, abo Lesia Ukrainka yak polityk. Zbruč. 23.11.2021. Access mode: https://zbruc.eu/node/108889.

19. Shton, H. (1998). Dukhovnyi prostir ukrainskoi liro-epichnoi prozy. Kyiv : Instytut literatury NAN Ukrainy.

20. Ushkalov, L. (2011). Vid baroko do postmodernu: esei. Kyiv : Hrani-T.

21. Ukrainka, Lesia (2020). Apokryf: Vybrane. Lesia Ukrainka. Chotyry rozmovy pro Lesiu Ukrainku. Kyiv : Komora.

22. Kononenko Ye. (2021). Apokryfichni interpretatsiyi. Access mode: https://krytyka.com/ua/articles /apokryfychni-interpretatsii.

23. Andrukhovych, Yu., Boichenko, O., Drul, O. (2018). Vorokhtarium. Literaturnyi trialoh z dialohom i monolohamy. Kyiv: Pabulum.

24. Besidy. Mykhailo Sydorzhevskyi – Hryhorii Shton (2020). Literaturna hazeta. 07.02.2020–30.10.2020. Access mode: https://litgazeta.com.ua/category/interviews/ .