Corporate Social Responsibility Management

: pp. 13 - 23
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Polissia National University

The scientific article considers the issues of corporate social responsibility management. The main approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of the implementation of corporate social responsibility measures are considered and the basic principles of evaluating the corporate social responsibility management system are determined. The basic principles of evaluation of the system of corporate social responsibility of the enterprise are analyzed, the main ones of which are: universality, predominance of performance indicators rather than efficiency, differentiation of indicators of external and internal environments instruments of strategic benchmarking in the social sphere in certain areas, such as training and development of employees, charity and sponsorship. A system of types of organizational profile is proposed in assessing the balance of corporate social responsibility management system, which takes into account the assessment of retrospective indicators, assessing the current state of corporate social responsibility and assessing the prospects of corporate social responsibility. The criteria for assessing the accumulated organizational experience in the field of corporate social responsibility and social investment, the criteria for assessing the current state of the corporate social responsibility system, the criteria for assessing the prospects for the development of the corporate social responsibility system are studied. The scheme of determining the type of organizational profile in assessing the balance of the corporate social responsibility system of the company and the system of four types: dynamic, indicates the company’s intention to make the area of corporate social responsibility a strategic factor of competitiveness; a balanced type of profile, which at a relatively high level of individual assessments speaks of a balanced social policy and successful practice of social investment; regressive profile, which signals to management that in the future the company may lose the benefits of sustainable development related to the social sphere and special attention should be paid to investment policy, risk assessment of social investment and balanced development of intellectual and social capital and the inertial profile reflects the complete absence of any CSR planning in the company.

  1. 1.Grinenko A.M. (2004). Sotsialna Polityka Navchalno - Metodychnyi posibnyk dlia samostiinoho vyvchennia dystsypliny [Social policy: Educational - methodical manual for independent study of the discipline]. KNE.
    2.Kolot A.M. (2010). Sotsialno-trudova sfera stan vidnosyn novi vyklyky tendentsii rozvytku monohrafiia [Socio-labor sphere: the state of relations, new challenges, trends: Monograph]. KNEU.
    3. BarkovV. Yu. (1990). Sotsialna polityka i perebudova [Social policy and restructuring. Political Publishing House of Ukraine].
    4. Kolot A.M., Grishnova O.A., Gerasimenko O.O (2010). Sotsializatsiia vidnosyn u sferi pratsi v konteksti stiikoho rozvytku monohrafiia [Socialization of labor relations in the context of sustainable development: Monograph, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine], Kyiv National Economic University named Vadym Hetman. KNEU. 348 p.
    5. Dudkin O.V. (2013). Poshyrennia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu rol identy-chnosti steikkholderiv pid- pryiemstva [Dissemination of social responsibility of business: the role of identity of stakeholders of the enterprise]. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. Series: Economics and Management. Vip. 6. P. 141-146.
    6. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Corporate governance strategies employed by firms employ that are ethical, socially friendly, and beneficial to its community. Retrieved from: resources/knowledge/other/corporate-social-responsibility-csr/ (accessed 04.05.2021).
    7. Stratehiia spryiannia rozvytku sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu v ukraini na period do 2020 roku. [Strategy to promote the development of corporate social responsibility in Ukraine until] 2020. Retrieved from: ukrayini.pdf (Accessed 12.05.2021).
    8. Krichevsky NA, Goncharov SF. (2007) Korporatyvna Sotsialna Vidpovidalnist [Corporate social responsibility]. Moscow, Sprava.
    9. Bowman K. (2013) Osnovy stratehichnoho menedzhmentu. banky i birzhi [Fundamentals of strategic management. Banks and Exchanges]. UNITI - Moscow.
    10. Turkin S. (2013). Demoralizatsiia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti ta problemy otsinky sotsialnoi efektyvnosti kompanii. ekonom [Demoralization of social responsibility and the problem of assessing the social efficiency of companies. Economic systems]. № 1. P. 18-19.
    11. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: (accessed 12.05.2021).
    12. Pryntsypy korporatyvnoi sotsyalnoi otvetstvennosty. [Principles of corporate social responsibility]. Retrieved from: (Access date 01.05.2021).
    13. Report on socially responsible investing trends in the united states. 2010. Retrieved from: 10_Trends_Exec_ Summary.pdf (Accessed 22.04.2021).
    14. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase its Profit. New York Times Magazine. September, 13. pp.122-126.
    15. Starodubska M. (2006). Efektyvnist sotsialnykh proektiv potribno vymiriaty. novyi marketyng [The effectiveness of social projects must be measured. New marketing].N8. P.36-42.
    16. Kotler F. (2005). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist. yak zrobyty yakomoha bilshe dobra dlia vashoi kompanii ta suspilstva [Corporate social responsibility. How to do as much good as possible for your company and society. Translation from English] S. Yarinich. Standard. P.4.