верховенство права

The article is dedicated to the analysis of judicial reform in Croatia and the potential application of its experience to Ukraine in the context of ensuring judicial independence, enhancing the efficiency of justice, and combating corruption. The main stages of the reform of the Croatian judicial system are examined, including the implementation of transparent procedures for the selection of judges, the establishment of an anti-corruption infrastructure, and the adaptation of judicial processes to European standards.

The article highlights the problem of ensuring the effective functioning of the criminal justice system in Ukraine, especially in the context of modern challenges, such as martial law and social transformations. The study of the implementation of criminal proceedings tasks as an effective means of combating criminal-illegitimate abuses by individual participants is relevant.

The article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the legal regulation and practice of applying preventive and coercive police measures in Ukraine through the prism of the standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The purpose of the study is to identify problematic aspects of harmonizing national legislation and law enforcement practice with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and to formulate proposals for their resolution.

The presented article is devoted to the theoretical and legal study of the problem of the integrity of judges through the analysis of the issue of updating methodological approaches to the normative regulation of a certain issue. It is motivated that the principle of integrity is an axiological attribute of public authorities and the judicial system in particular.

The principle of the rule of law is a fundamental element of constitutional law that ensures stability and justice in the legal system. This article explores the historical development of the rule of law, from its origins in classical legal systems to modern interpretations and implementations. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of key aspects of the rule of law, such as its importance for the protection of human rights and freedoms and the role of constitutions in ensuring it.

The article is devoted to the study of the problems of accessibility of administrative proceedings through the lens of overcoming the problems of discrimination. The principle of access to the court is key in ensuring the right to justice in the modern social and legal reality, provided for by numerous international and national norms of the constitutional and industry levels, therefore the change of certain guarantees of the judicial process causes threats to the accessibility of the judicial process.

Abstract. In accordance with international legal standards in Ukraine, the independence of judges is guaranteed by the Constitution (part one of Article 126). It is prohibited to influence the judge in any way (part two of Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine). Also, the first part of Article 129 of the Basic Law of Ukraine states that a judge, when administering justice, is independent and governed by the rule of law.

The article analyzes the principles of justice as the basis for the functioning of the judicial system. It is noted that in recent years there has been increased scientific interest in the guarantees of the realization of everyone's constitutional right to judicial protection, as well as the theoretical bases and principles (fundamentals) of the administration of justice.

The article considers the concept and characteristics of state coercion in the context of the rule of law, rule of law and legality. The rule of law does not and cannot deny the exercise of coercive influence, but does not recognize coercion that is not based on law. It is noted that in legal science there is no generally accepted approach to the interpretation of state coercion. State coercion is defined differently by researchers. State coercion can be defined as the authorized activity of officials aimed at exercising power in order to comply with and enforce legal acts.

In general, democracy should be understood as a political form of government in the state, exercised by the people or directly (direct democracy), or indirectly through elected representatives (representative democracy). The analysis of foreign literature made it possible to generalize the signs of democracy. However, it is stated that they are purely formal. It is the quality of these institutions that reflects the reality of democracy. A separate analysis of the basic principle of democracy - the rule of law.