Rationality in Decision-Making Within Inter-Organisational Networks

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
University of Silesia in Katowice

A networking structure is a natural phase in the evolution of organisational forms. An organisational form of a network is a set of interconnected structures and technological elements, i.e. individual economic agents, cultural and social values that arrange inter-organisational relations in a certain order and make network processes operate in a system-like fashion. Effective joint work in inter-organisational networks suggests a need for a common goal, which is perceived to be a critical factor for joint activities.

The paper studies the rationality of decision-making for inter-organisational networks. The analysis of behaviour within inter-organisational networks that consist of agents, like firms, entrepreneurs, governmental authorities, scientific centres, proves that group decisions are not always an optimal method to achieve a goal. There are certain tasks and circumstances when an authoritarian approach to problem solving is more sensible. It analyses a formalized model for joint choice, prevailing practice and rationality of group decision-making in order to reach a strategic balance within a network. The study summarizes key advantages and drawbacks in case a decision is made by a group.

1.Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L (1998). Small groups. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 2, P. 415-469.
2.Bornstein, G. & Yaniv, I. (1998). Individual and group behaviour in the ultimatum games: are groups more "rational" players. Experimental Economics, Vol. 1, P. 101-108.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009914001822
3.Cox, J. C. (2002). Trust, reciprocity and other-regarding preferences: groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. Avoidances in Experimental Business Research, Vol.108, P. 331-350. 4,Blinder, A. S. & Morgan, J. (2005). Are two heads better than one? An experimental analysis of group vs. individual decision making. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 7, P. 183-191. 5,Cason, T. N. & Mui, V.-L. (1997). A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game. Economic Journal, Vol. 107, P. 1465-1483.
6.Kozeletsky, Iu. (1979).Psychological theory of decisions. Moscow: Progress.
7.Diev, V.S. Joint decisions: pros & cons. Retrieved from www.philosophy.nsc.ru.