The results of research of the chemical activation process of clinoptilolite from Sokirnytskyi field are shown. As a result of the research, the effectiveness of the influence on zeolite hydrochloric and sulfuric acids are compared. It should be noted that the advantage is on the side of hydrochloric acid. It was established that the increase in the concentration of sulfuric acid and the time of zeolite processing leads only to the increase in the content of the amorphous phase. As a result of the experiment, optimal conditions for zeolite activation: reagent – hydrochloric acid, concentration of acid – 7 %, the processing time – 2 hours, phase ratio T:R – 1:2 were selected.
[1]. Mal'ovanyy M. S., Odnorih Z. S. Kyslotna modyfikatsiya klynoptylolitu. // Visnyk Derzhavnoho u-tu “L'vivs'ka politekhnika”. – Khimiya, tekhnolohiya rechovyn ta yikh zastosuvannya. – No. 395, 2000 – S. 108–110.
[2]. Vplyv parametriv kyslotnoyi aktyvatsiyi suhlynku temno-buroho na yoho sorbtsiyni vlastyvosti shchodo ioniv khromu (III) Ye. O. Bovsunovs'kyy, O. V. Ryabchevs'kyy, Yu. Ya. Hodovs'ka, O. H. Lychmanenko Proceedings of the National Aviation University s 123–125.
[3]. Tarasevych Yu. Y. Pryrodnye sorbenty v protsessakh ochystky vody / Yu. Y. Tarasevych. – K. : Nauk. dumka, 1981. – 207 s.
[4]. Solokha I. V., Chverenchuk A. I., Vakhula Ya. I. Aspekty krystalizatsiyi tseolitu a v formovanykh kaolinovykh hranulakh // Visnyk Natsional'noho universytetu “L'vivs'ka politekhnika”. – Khimiya, tekhnolohiya rechovyn ta yikh zastosuvannya. – No. 761, 2013. – S. 330–335.
[5]. Viten'ko T. Zastosuvannya hidrodynamichnoyi kavitatsiyi u sorbtsiynykh protsesakh doochyshchennya vody // Visnyk TNTU. – 2012. – T. 65. – No. 1. – S. 238–243. – (khimiya. khimichna, biolohichna ta kharchova tekhnolohiyi).
[6]. Vasylechko V. O., Hryshchuk H. V., Kuz'ma Yu. B., Zakordons'kyy V. P., Lebedynets' L. O. – Adsorbtsiyni vlastyvosti kyslotno modyfikovanoho zakarpat·s'koho klynoptylolitu. – Pratsi 3-ho zakhidnoukrayins'koho sympoziumu z adsorbtsiyi ta khromatohrafiyi, L'viv, 2003, S. 62–67.
[7]. Semko L. S., Khutornyy S. V., Storozhuk L. P., Dzyubenko L. S., Horbyk P. P. Formuvannya struktury ta doslidzhennya vlastyvostey mahnitokerovanykh adsorbentiv na osnovi mahnetytu ta dioksynu kremniyu z pidvyshchenoyu pytomoyu poverkhneyu // PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF SOLID STATE T. 14, No. 3 (2013). – S. 602–609.
[8]. Hurevych D. A. – Pererabotka otkhodov v promyshlennosty poluproduktov y krasyteley. – M., Moskva, 1980, 158 s.
[9]. Zhdanov S. P., Ehorov E. N. – Khymyya tseolytov. – L.: Nauka, 1968, 158 s.
[10]. Vasyl'yev H. V. – Ochystka stochnykh vod krasyl'no – otdelochnykh fabryk. – M., 1972, 51 s.
[11]. Yaroshenko K. K., Bortnik YE. V., Kuzenko S. V., Kolyabina I. L., Bondarenko H. M. Osoblyvosti kinetyky sorbtsiyi kobal'tu-60 ta marhantsyu- 54 pryrodnymy ta modyfikovanymy sorbentamy z bahatokomponentnykh rozchyniv // Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' Instytutu heokhimiyi navkolyshn'oho seredovyshcha – No. 25, 2016. – S. 64–73.