DIRECTIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF A MACHINE-BUILDING ENTERPRISE ON THE EXAMPLE OF SE “SELPROEKT”

The paper presents the results of analysing the activities of a machine-building enterprise, taking into account the influence of factors of the political and socio-economic crisis. Based on the results of the PEST- and SWOT-analysis, the most promising directions of sustainable development of an engineering enterprise are identified, namely, implementation of energy-efficient solutions, use of circular economy principles, application of environmentally friendly technologies, digitalisation, and personnel training. The introduction of an environmental management system will significantly contribute to expanding the development opportunities of machine-building enterprises, increasing their competitiveness and ensuring sustainable development.

1. Baumgartner, R.J. (2013). Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1336

2. Dekaliuk, O.V., &Stasiuk, I.V. (2010). Vprovadzhennia ekolohichnoho menedzhmentu ta audytu dlia zabezpechennia ekolohichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 2(1), 235-242.Retrieved fromhttp://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/2010_2_1/pdf/235-242.pdf

3. Demyanenko, T.I. (2020). Stalyi rozvytok vitchyznianykh pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh ekonomichnykh umovakh. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Ekonomika i upravlinnia, 31(70)(2), 185-188.doi: https://doi.org/10.32838/2523-4803/70-2-30

4. Denysiuk, S.P., &Vasylenko, V.I. (2016).Enerhetychni, ekonomichni ta ekolohichni pokaznyky enerhoefektyvnosti. Enerhetyka: ekonomika, tekhnolohii, ekolohiia, 1(43), 33–44.Retrieved fromhttps://ela.kpi.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/e72dd49f-5075-4b28-b33f-a9...

5. Dyllick, T., &Muff, K. (2015). Clarifying the Meaning of Sustainable Business: Introducing a Typology From Business-as-Usual to True Business Sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174.doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176

6. Dzhedzhula, V.V. (2014). Enerhozberezhennia promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: metodolohiia formuvannia, mekhanizm upravlinnia: monohrafiia. Vinnytsia: VNTU. .

7. Ekonomika viiny ta povoiennyi ekonomichnyi rozvytok Ukrainy: problemy, priorytety, zavdannia. (2022).Retrieved fromhttps://www.prostir.ua/?news=ekonomika-vijny-ta-povojennyj-ekonomichnyj-...

8. Hall, J.K., Daneke, G.A., & Lenox, M.J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002

9. Hrechko, A., &Ocheretiana, O. (2020). Doslidzhennia evoliutsii naukovoi dumky v aspektakh vyznachennia sutnosti poniattia «stalyi rozvytok pidpryiemstva». Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii, 15, 37-41.doi: https://doi.org/10.37320/2415-3583/15.6

10. Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M.,& Leiserowitz, A.A. (2005). Editorial-What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,47, 8–21.doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444

11. Kravchenko, M.O., &Prudkyi, V.V. (2020). Model analizu staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva z urakhuvanniam ryzyku. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU «KPI», 17, 291-305.doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.17.2020.216368

12. Kuzmina, O.S. (2015). Analiz pidkhodiv do traktuvannia poniattia stalyi rozvytok pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, 5(1), 13‐21.Retrieved fromhttps://elar.khmnu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/dc4da8cf-40f9-4e24-...

13. Kviatkovska, L.A. (2013). Realizatsiia pryntsypiv kontseptsii staloho rozvytku v diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen, 1(48), 85–89.Retrieved from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=L...

14. Kyrych, N.B., Melnyk, L.M., &Pohaidak, O.B. (2015). Stalyi rozvytok subiektiv hospodariuvannia: sutnist ta faktory vplyvu (yevropeiski aktsenty). Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2, 151–155.Retrieved from http://www.venu-journal.org/download/2015/2(29)/pdf/29-Kyrych.pdf

15. Lepeiko, T.I., & Mazorenko, O.V. (2017). Rozvytok pidpryiemstva yak sotsialno-ekolohichnoi systemy v umovakh nestabilnosti. Mechanism of Economic Regulation,3, 65-75.Retrieved from https://mer.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/content/acticles/issue_34/Tetyana_I_Lepeiko...

16. Melnyk, L., Sherstiuk, R., &Diakiv, L. (2018). Formuvannia systemy motyvatsiinykh determinant zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava, 2(19), 60-74.doi:        https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2018.02.060

17. Mishchenko, S. P. (2011). Teoretychni zasady stiikoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 36, 168-171.Retrieved fromhttp://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=L...

18. Rahmana, F., &Bawono, A. (2021). Sustainable development toward sustainable enterprise. Management Science Letters, 11(2021), 657–668.doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.001

19. Vasylenko L.O., Bereznytska Yu.O., &Zhukova O.H. (2017). Rozvytok ekolohichnoho menedzhmentu na pidpryiemstvi v umovakh hlobalizatsii ekonomiky Ukrainy. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 8, 62-65.Retrieved fromhttp://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/8_2017/17.pdf

20. Veremeenko, O.O. (2018). Otsinka enerhoefektyvnosti pidpryiemstv mashynobuduvannia ta rozroblennia proektiv z yii pidvyshchennia. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: seriia: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo, 19(1), 43–46.Retrieved fromhttp://www.visnyk-econom.uzhnu.uz.ua/archive/19_1_2018ua/12.pdf