The effects of infill patterns on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts fabricated by FDM
Надіслано: Березень 15, 2021
Переглянуто: Квітень 28, 2021
Прийнято: Квітень 30, 2021

M. Eryildiz, "The effects of infill patterns on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts fabricated by FDM", Ukrainian Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 1-8, 2021.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Polylactic acid (PLA) parts were fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM) at various infill patterns at 30% infill density. Five different infill patterns (stars, 3D honeycomb, honeycomb, gyroid, Hilbert curve) have been investigated. The results have shown that the honeycomb infill pattern exhibited the highest mechanical properties with 29.43 MPa and 2.04 mm elongation due to the improved strength of the strut junctions in this pattern. In the case of the Hilbert curve pattern, compared to the other patterns, though they have the same infill density, tensile strength was lowest because of the presence of large air gaps in the pattern that induced rapid fracture during the test. The optical microscope images of the fracture surfaces were compatible with the tensile strength results. Also considering the build time and the spent filament, it can be said that the honeycomb infill pattern is very promising. Lastly, the results showed that the tensile strength and elongation of 3D printed PLA parts increased 43.4% and 32%, respectively, under optimum infill pattern conditions. The findings of this study will help manufacturing firms and researchers to decide on the appropriate infill pattern, so that FDM parts can be fabricated with minimal production cost and good mechanical properties.

[1] M. Altan, M. Eryildiz, B. Gumus, and Y. Kahraman, “Effects of process parameters on the quality of PLA products fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM): surface roughness and tensile strength”, Materials Testing, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 471–477, 2018.

[2] R. Srinivasan, W. Ruban, A. Deepanraj, R. Bhuvanesh, and T. Bhuvanesh, “Effect on infill density on mechanical properties of PETG part fabricated by fused deposition modelling”, Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, part 2, pp. 1838–1842, 2020.

[3] S. Bardiya, J. Jerald, and V. Satheeshkumar, “Effect of process parameters on the impact strength of fused filament fabricated (FFF) polylactic acid (PLA) parts”, Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 41, part 5, pp. 1103–1106, 2021.

[4] A. Garg, A. Bhattacharya, and A. Batish, “On Surface Finish and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Parts after Cold Vapor Treatment”, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 522–529, 2015.

[5] A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, and A. Guzman, “Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 10, pp. 791–803, 2017.

[6] R. Hedayati, M. Sadighi, M. Mohammadi-Aghdam, and A. A. Zadpoor, “Mechanical properties of additively manufactured octagonal honeycombs”, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, vol. 69, pp. 1307–1317, 2016.

[7] P. K. Mishra, P. Senthil, S. Adarsh, and M. S. Anoop, “An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts”, Composites Communications, vol. 24, Article number 100605, 2021.

[8] S. Parab, and N. Zaveri, “Investigating the Influence of Infill Pattern on the Compressive Strength of Fused Deposition Modelled PLA Parts”, in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, H. Vasudevan, V. Kottur, A. Raina (Editors): Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, Springer, Singapore, pp. 239–247, 2020.

[9] A. Aloyaydi, S. Sivasankaran, and A. Mustafa, “Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid”, Polymer Testing, vol. 87, Article number 106557, 2020.

[10] M. Lalegani Dezaki, and M. K. A. Mohd Ariffin, “The Effects of Combined Infill Patterns on Mechanical Properties in FDM Process”, Polymers, vol. 12, no. 2792, pp. 1–20, 2020.

[11] H. M. Yin, J. Qian, J. Zhang, Z. F. Lin, J. S. Li, J. Z. Xu, and Z. M. Li, “Engineering Porous Poly(lactic acid) Scaffolds with High Mechanical Performance via a Solid State Extrusion/Porogen Leaching Approach”, Polymers, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2016.

[12] W. H. Zhang, B. Y. Chen, H. B. Zhao, P. Yu, D. J. Fu, J. S. Wen, and X. F. Peng, “Processing and characterization of supercritical CO2 batch foamed poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) scaffold for tissue engineering application”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 130, pp. 3066–3073, 2013.

[13] W. Yang, N. Zeng, H. Mei, C. Chen, X. Lin, and L. Cheng, “Designable Mechanical Properties of 3D Printing Composites with Multiple Filaments by Different Infill Percentages and Structures”, Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 21, Article number 1900508, 2019.

[14] S. Wang, Y. Ma, Z. Deng, S. Zhang, and J. Cai, “Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials”, Polymer Testing, vol. 86, Article number 106483, pp. 1–8, 2020.

[15] J. Jiang, X. Xu, J. Stringer, “Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review”, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, vol. 2, no. 64, pp. 1–23, 2018.