criminal procedural law

The article is devoted to the problem of organization of forensic activity in the process of criminal prosecution and, in general, to the problem of improving the whole procedure of obtaining evidentiary information in the process of criminal proceedings in European countries. Such foreign experience can be, in particular, extremely useful both for the organization of forensic activities in Ukraine and, in general, for improving the whole procedure of obtaining evidentiary information in the course of criminal proceedings in the context of procedural coercion.

The article deals with the problem of the nature of procedural coercion in the process of preventive measures related to the partial restriction of a person's freedom during criminal proceedings. In particular, an analysis of a relatively new preventive measure, which found anchoring in the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine ‒ house arrest, which is a certain legislative filling in of the gap that arose between preventive measures, unrelated to the restriction of freedom of person, is provided.

The article is devoted to the problem of organization of forensic expert activity in the
process of criminal prosecution and, in general, the problem of improving the whole procedure
for obtaining evidence in the course of criminal proceedings. On the basis of the analysis of
domestic and foreign scientific literature, some issues of the organization of forensic expert
activity in some European states, as well as issues of legal (procedural) status of a judicial
expert are investigated. The conclusion is drawn about the importance of foreign experience in

The article is devoted to the problem of determining the essence of criminal prosecution
as an institution of criminal procedural law. , as well as establishing the ratio of prosecution in
criminal proceedings and prosecution. On the basis of the research of the scientific positions of
certain scholars-processualists on the essence of criminal prosecution as a criminal procedural
category, it was concluded that criminal prosecution is the leading independent function of

A place and role of criminal judicial politics are found out in the article, as component politics of the state in industry of counteraction to the crimes. Facilities of realization of criminal judicial politics are set. Defined the tasks of criminal procedure policy to effectively achieve the purpose of punishment. The prospects of development of criminal judicial politics of Ukraine are outlined in direction of implementation of international legal obligations.