Investigations of methodical errors of two-color compensative and classical energy and spectral ratio pyrometry are performed under conditions of changeable radiative characteristics of metal alloys. To quantitatively estimate the radiative characteristics we proposed such parameters as an average level of emissivity and selectivity factor. As average (adjustment) values of these parameters we chose the values, which correspond to tungsten in vacuum with temperature 1600 K (for wavelengths 0.7 and 0.9 µm). The ranges of changes of these parameters correspond to metallurgical furnaces and aggregates conditions in optimal sighting zones. In accordance with adjustment values of radiative characteristics the corrections in mathematical models of classical and two-color compensative thermometry were made. On the base of analysis of thermometry methods mathematical models influence regularities of emissivity average level and selectivity coefficient on methodical errors are established. As distinct from classical thermometry, methodical errors of two-color compensative thermometry practically don’t depend on selectivity factor. This fact is advantage of two-color compensative thermometry. In such a way we can minimize the errors of contactless temperature measurements of metal alloys coated by transparent and semitransparent oxide films. These films cause significant changes in the selectivity factor. The deviations of average level of emissivity from adjustment value which cause methodical errors absolute values 1.0 % and 0.5 % are determined. They are ±0.042 and ±0.020, correspondingly. The complex influence of radiative characteristics on methodical errors of optical thermometry is the most widespread in metallurgy. That is why the ratio of investigated methods errors will change depending on ratio of radiative characteristics. The function between the selectivity factor and the average level of emissivity which demands the equality of methodical errors of all investigated methods is determined. Under the complex influence of average level of emissivity and selectivity factor the errors of two-color compensative thermometry are lower than the errors of infrared classical energy and spectral ratio thermometry in 1.04–1.26 and 1.21–1.57 times, respectively.
[1] L. F. Zhukov, and D. A. Petrenko, “Selectivity influence of heat radiation of metal alloys on methodical errors of their classical and two-colour compensative thermometry”, Industrial heat engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 2017. (in Russian).
[2] Z. Zhang, B. Tsai, and G. Machin, Radiometric temperature measurements. II Applications. Burlington, USA: Academic Press, 2010.
[3] V. N. Snopko, The bases of pyrometry methods with the use of spectrum of heat radiation. Minsk, Belarus: Institute of physics named after B. I. Stepanov NASB, 1999 (in Russian).
[4] N. Gots, L. Nazarenko, and M. Mykyichuk. “Development of multichannel thermometry for radiation for implementation of multiband and test methods for measuring temperature”, Ukrainian Metrological Journal, no. 4, pp. 64–67, 2016 (in Ukrainian).
https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.4.2016.112870
[5] W. F. Gale, and T. C. Totemeier, Smithells Metals Reference Book (8-th edition). Burlington, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004.