The main purpose of system-oriented measuring instruments (MI) is to ensure automated collection, processing, analysis and transmission of measurement data as part of complex information and measurement systems. Such MI are used in automated production systems, intelligent measuring systems, in the control of technological processes and in conducting scientific research, etc. The main properties of system-oriented MI are provided by a combination of modern hardware, powerful digital processing algorithms and integration into automated systems. They implement microprocessor systems with the implementation of self-diagnostic algorithms, built-in real-time controllers, etc. They have a modular architecture with the possibility of software configurability. In addition to the traditional MI testing methods, system-oriented MI is subject to mandatory testing of its software. To build a mathematical model of a system-oriented MI, a block-hierarchical approach was applied for different hierarchical levels. The mathematical modeling conducted allowed us to develop a multiple model of the system of indicators of the MI properties. The proposed model allows for the study of the influence of the MI properties and their evaluation at all stages of the MI life cycle. It also allows taking into account specific parameters of the MI properties and the corresponding methods for their determination. The model allows taking into account the features of system-oriented MIs, in particular, indicators of the MI’s properties in terms of ensuring system functions and the corresponding methods for their determination. At each phase of the MI life cycle, both the appropriate verification for the sets of MI properties and their validation should be carried out. When implementing these procedures, it is necessary to use the established requirements of widely used international and regional metrology guidelines.
- ISO/IEC 17025, “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories,” ISO/IEC, 2017, https://www.iso.org/ISO-IEC-17025-testing-and- calibration-laboratories.html
- OIML D 31, “General requirements for software controlled measuring instruments,” OIML, 2023, https://www.oiml. org/en/publications/documents/en/files/pdf_d/d031-e23.pdf
- WELMEC Guide 7.2, “Software Guide (Measuring Instruments Directive 2014/32/EU),” WELMEC, 2023, https://www.welmec.org/welmec/documents/guides/7.2/202 3/WELMEC_Guide_7.2_2023.pdf
- WELMEC Guide 7.6, “Software Risk Assessment,” WELMEC, 2021, https://www.welmec.org/welmec/ documents/guides/7.6/2021/WELMEC_Guide_7.6_v2021.pdf
- Velychko O., Gordiyenko T., “Comparative research of quality indicators of measuring instruments: practical aspects,” Ukrainian Metrological Journal, 2021, issue 3, pp. 24–30. https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241620
- Velychko O., Hrabovskyi O., Gordiyenko T., Volkov S., “Modeling of a system of quality assessment indicators of measuring instruments,” Eastern-European Journal of Enter- prise Technologies. Information and controlling systems, 2021, no. 2/9(110), pp. 69–78, https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.228853
- Cain J.W., “Mathematical Models in the Sciences. Molecular Life Sciences,” Springer, New York, NY, 2014, 6 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6436-5_561-1
- Velychko O., Hrabovskyi O., “The Mathematical Model of the System Oriented Measuring Instrument,” Ukrainian Metrological Journal, 2021, issue 2, pp. 15–19. https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.2.2021.236057
- Velychko O., Gordiyenko T., Hrabovskyi O., “Testing of measurement instrument software on the national level,” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Information and controlling systems, 2018, 2/9 (92), pp. 13-20. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.125994
- Velychko O., Gaman V., Gordiyenko T., Hrabovskyi O., “Testing of measurement instrument software with the pur- pose of conformity assessment,” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Information and controlling sys- tems, 2019, 1/9 (97), pp. 19-26. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.154352
- K. D. Sommer and B. R. L. Siebert, “Systematic approach to the modelling of measurements for uncertainty evaluation,” Metrologia, vol. 43, 2006, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0026-1394/43/4/S06
- Q. Yang and C. Butler, “An Object-Oriented Model of Measurement Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 47, 1998, no. 1, pp.104-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.728800
- Yan S., Yan X., “Joint monitoring of multiple quality-related indicators in nonlinear processes based on multi-task learning,” Measurement. vol. 165, 2020. 108158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108158
- Ravber M., Mernik M., Crepinsek M., “The impact of Quality Indicators on the rating of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 55, 2017, pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.038
- S. Volkov, “Set-theoretic model of the information State of the industrial cyber- physical system,” Scientific Journal of the Ternopil National Technical University, 2018, № 1 (89), pp. 132-138. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/ article?articleId=1655920
- JCGM 200, “International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM),” BIPM, 2012. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM200-2012
- JCGM 100, “Uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995).”BIPM, 2008. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM100-2008E
- ILAC-G24/OIML D10, “Guidelines for the Determination of Recalibration Intervals of Measuring Equipment Used in Testing Laboratories,” OIML, 2022. https://www.oiml.org/ en/files/pdf_d/d010-e22.pdf