MONITORING SYSTEM FOR THE POPULATION STATUS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED FAUNA SPECIES IN UKRAINIAN NATURE RESERVES

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The article describes the process and results of developing a model for assessing the risk and causes of extinction of rare fauna species in the reserves of the western part of Ukraine, considering specific environmental conditions of the region. An information model of the system has been developed, which includes the collection of data from GPS devices and mapping resources to create an interactive map with population indicators. The process of assessing the status of populations based on fuzzy logic is also described, which allows to take into account uncertainty in the input data and make more accurate predictions about the status of species. The system was implemented using modern technologies such as React for the frontend, Node.js for the backend, Mapbox for interactive maps, and MongoDB for data storage.

  1. H. Rosner, "The ‘Internet of Animals’ Could Transform What We Know About Wildlife", Yale Environment 360, Jul. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://e360.yale.edu/ features/internet-of-animals-icarus
  2. F. Hasan, J. Nyström, C. Andersson A. Silva, "The business case for investing in biodiversity data", 2025, doi: 10.32942/X27W61
  3. F. Keck, T. Peller, R. Alther, C. Barouillet, "The global human impact on biodiversity". Nature, pp. 1-6, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2
  4. C. Amaka, G. Okeke, Ndubuisi, E. Cletus, "Protecting the Web of Life: Advanced Biodiversity Conservation and Res- toration Techniques", International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, vol. 13(1), pp. 448-457, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15088565.
  5. Ukraine conflict environmental briefing: Nature, Conflict and Environment Observatory, 2024. [Online]. Available: https:// ceobs.org/ukraine-conflict-environmental-briefing-nature/
  6. M. Mashevska, R. Shchur, A. Ostenda, "Global environ- mental monitoring system", Measuring Equipment and Metrology. vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 26–31, 2021, doi:10.23939/istcmtm2021.04.026
  7. V. Slipchenko, L. Poliahushko, O. Krush, and V. Rudyk, "Investigation of approaches to designing complex database structures in systems of integrated monitoring of environmental, economic, energy and social parameters of the territory", Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2, no. 2(76), pp. 38–43, 2024. doi: 10.15587/2706-5448.2024.302396
  8. Environmental Evaluation Modeling System (EEMS), Conservation Biology Institute. [Online]. Available: https://consbio.org/software/environmental-evaluation- modeling-system-eems/
  9. M. Brief, "Modern Technologies Helping Save Endangered Species", Natural Habitat Adventures, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nathab.com/blog/technologies- helping-save-endangered-species/
  10. Biodiversity monitoring, Frankfurt Zoological Society. [Online]. Available: https://ukraine.fzs.org/en/project/ biodiversity-monitoring/
  11. E. Acton, M. Rander, "Technology for preserving biodiversity", SAP Insights, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sap.com/ukraine/blogs/technology-for-biology- preserving-biodiversity
  12. M. Kunnasranta, E. Miettinen, M. Melin, A. Meller, "The performance of alternative GPS tracking devices: a case report on wild boars (Sus scrofa)", Animal Biotelemetry, vol. 12, pp. 12-27, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40317-024-00382-1
  13. C. Shrivastav, Jyoti, M. Joshi, G. Bhadauriya, "Global Positioning System and Associated Technologies in Biodiversity Conservation", International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 14-20, 2024, doi: 10.59256/ijire.20240504004.
  14. A. Kumar et al., "Fuzzy and Neural Network Model-Based Environmental Quality Monitoring System" Modeling and Simulation of Environmental Systems: A Computation Approach, CRC Press, 1st Edition, Chapter: 10, 2021, pp.149-173. doi: 10.1201/9781003203445-10
  15. Y. Maksymova, O. Boiko, "Using a fuzzy impact assessment for the environment quality evaluation", Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, vol. 93, pp. 59–71, 2021. doi: 10.23939/istcgcap2021.93.059
  16. R. Boyd, M. Botham, E. Dennis, R. Fox et al., "Using causal diagrams and superpopulation models to correct geographic biases in biodiversity monitoring data", Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 16(2), pp. 332-344, 2025. 10.1111/2041-210X.14492.