Study of recent movements of the earth crust by the data of the underground deformation stations

Authors:
1
Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences

The character of a geodetic method of study of recent movements of the rocks and method of local measurements are compared. The network of underground deformation stations in Carpathians is considered. The results of station observations and the results of the long-term geodetic measurements which have been carried out in Austria-Hungary are compared. The structure of fields of deformations in western part of the East Carpathians on these data and data of two stations «Muzhievo» and «Beregovo» coincide. The main axes of a field of the deformations have latitude and meridian directions. There is an intensive compression in the latitude azimuth. In east part of the east Carpathians on border with Vigorlat-Guta volcanic ridge the station «Korolevo» registers intensive expansion of the surface in latitude direction. The data of geological and geophysical researches confirm objectivity of the received results.

1. Rogozhin E.A., Zaharova A.I. Paleozem­letrjasenija i sejsmicheskij rezhim podvizhnyh sistem Severnoj Evrazii // Naprjazhenno-deformirovannoe sostojanie i sejsmichnost' litosfery. - Novosibirsk, 2003.-S. 150-152.

2. Dobrovol'skij I.P. Teorija podgotovki tektonicheskogo zemletrjasenija. Sh M.: IFZ RAN, 1991.-219s.

3. Verbickij T., Kendzera A., Kuznecova V., Kutas R., Latynina L. i dr. Metodika obrabotki i analiza dannyh geofi­zicheskogo monitoringa sejsmotektoniches­kih processov v Zakarpat'e i ego rezul'taty // Geofiz. zhurn. — 2000. - T. 22, №3.-S.9-17.

4. Verbickij T.Z., Latynina L.A. Lokal'nye deformacionnye izmerenija kak metod geodinamicheskih issledovanij // VIII Mіzhnarodnij naukovo-tehnіchnij simpozіum «Geoіnformacіjnij monіtoring navkolish­n'ogo seredovishha — GPS і GIS-tehnologії» 1-6 veresnja 2003 r., Alushta (Krim) (zbіrnik materіalіv). — L'vіv. - 2003. - S. 60-62.

5. Latynina L.A. Lokal'nye deformacionnye izmerenija kak metod izuchenija geodi­namicheskih processov. Ocherki geofizi­cheskih issledovanij. 75-letie IFZ. — M.: OIFZ RAN. - 2003-2004. - S. 377-383.

6. Prilepin M.T., Baranova S.M. O normi­rovke deformacij, izmerennyh s pomoshh'ju GPS // Geofizicheskie issledovanija. - M.: IFZ RAN. - 2005. - Vyp. 3. - S.116-122.

7. Verbickij T.Z., Ignatishin V.V., Latyni­na L.A., Jurkevich O.I. Sovremennye deformacii zemnoj kory Beregovskoj gorstovoj zony // Geodinamika. — 1998. — № 1(1) — S. 118-120.

8. Latynina L.A., Verbickij T.Z., Varga P., Varga T., Jurkevich O.I. Sovremennye dvizhenija Pannonskogo bassejna po jekstenzometricheskim dannym // DAN. — 1998.-№ 1.—S.114—116.

9. Results of exensometric, microseismic and other regime investigations. Janusz Sledzinski (editor), Varga P., Verbitsky Т., Latynina L., Brimich L. // Geodynamics of Northern Car­pathians. Reports on Geodesy. CEI CERGOP Study Group № 8. Geotectonic. Analysis of the Region of Central Europe. Warsaw University of Technology. - 1998. - Part 3.2. - P. 109- 111.

10. Varga P., Verbickij T.3., Latynina L.A., Sadecki-Kardosh D.i dr. Gorizontal'nye deformacii zemnoj kory v Karpatskom regione // NTR. №7 (58), 2002 g. - 2003. - 1(59).-S. 5-8.

11. Vasil'ev I.M, Bojarskij Je.A., Suvoro- vaI.I. Issledovanie naklonov i defor­macij na geofizicheskoj stancii Protvino. M.: Fizika Zemli. - 2001. — № 9. — S. 10-17.

12. Somov V.I., Rahimova I.Sh. Sovremennye dvizhenija zemnoj kory Karpato-Balkanskogo regiona. - Kiev: Nauk, dumka, 1983. - 144 s.

13. Guseva T.V., Mishin A.B., Skovorodkin Ju.P. Sovremennye gorizontal'nye dvizhenija na raznyh masshtabnyh urovnjah // Fizika Zemli. - 1996. - № 12. - S. 86-91.

14. Maleev E.F. Neogenovyj vulkanizm Zakar­pat'ja. — M.: Nauka. —1964. — 250 s.

15. Chekunov A.B. Principy stroenija i jevoljucii tektonosfery juga evropejskoj chasti SSSR //Geotektonika. - 1987. -№ 5 - S.25-41.

16. Tret'jak K.P., Serant O.V. Rezul'taty opredelenija sovremennyh gorizontal'nyh deformacij zemnoj poverhnosti na territorii Central'noj Evropy // Vestnik geodezii i kartografii. — 2002. - № 2(25) - S. 13-19