martial law

Researching the problematic aspects of realizing the constitutional right to liberty and personal inviolability under martial law is a pressing issue. This article addresses the problem of legal regulation and the practical application of coercive measures, such as the detention of an individual by an authorized official without an order from an investigative judge or court.

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of criminal proceedings initiated on the grounds of criminal offenses provided for in Articles 404 and 405 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which regulate liability for resistance to a superior or coercion of him to violate official duties, as well as for threat or violence against a superior.

In the context of full-scale armed aggression against Ukraine, the issue of torture is becoming particularly acute. The use of torture in occupied territories, in places of detention, and against civilians and prisoners of war is not only a gross violation of human rights, but also a serious war crime. The classification of such acts is complicated by the specifics of martial law, the multiplicity of possible criminal offenses, and the need to simultaneously apply the norms of national criminal law and international humanitarian law.

Abstract. The article highlights the problem of the transformation of the institution of preventive measures in criminal proceedings in Ukraine under martial law. A relevant area of study is the balance between the need for effective crime counteraction, particularly against crimes against the foundations of national security, and the state’s obligation to guarantee fundamental human rights, primarily the right to liberty and personal inviolability, which, according to the Constitution of Ukraine, is not subject to restriction even under extraordinary circumstances.

Purpose – The purpose of the study is to clarify the conceptual and practical consequences of repealing the Commercial Code of Ukraine and transitioning to a new model of legal regulation of economic activity. Particular attention is given to identifying strategic benchmarks for legislative support of entrepreneurship under martial law, economic digitalization, and Ukraine’s integration into the European Union legal framework.

Freedom of information is a fundamental right that ensures transparency and accountability in a democratic society. However, in times of war, governments often impose legal restrictions on access to public information to protect national security and maintain public order. This article examines the balance between freedom of information and state security in Ukraine under martial law. It analyzes the legal framework governing access to public information and the limitations introduced during wartime.

Relevance of the article lies in the fact that one of the key tasks of the state is to ensure the protection of the rights and interests of citizens that may be violated due to corrupt activities. Combating corruption is not only a public demand but also a crucial prerequisite for the stable functioning of state institutions, especially under the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine, which affectsthe operation of government bodies, including their ability to effectively counteract corruption.

The article examines the forensic characterization of evasion of military service by self-mutilation or in another way as a separate type of military criminal offenses that have become particularly relevant in the context of armed aggression against Ukraine. The need to form a scientifically sound and practically oriented methodology for their investigation is substantiated, which is based on the construction of a forensic characterization as a holistic system of typical signs of a crime.

Abstract. This article examines the issue of domestic violence in the context of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. It proposes comprehensive measures to address this problem, including legislative improvements, expanded access to crisis centers, and stricter accountability for perpetrators. The article also underscores the need for interagency cooperation between state authorities, civil society organizations, and international institutions in combating domestic violence during wartime.

The article analyzes the issues of combating corruption during martial law, emphasizing the importance of avoiding discretionary norms in legislation. The author examines the main features of discretionary powers and analyzes the consequences of the use of administrative discretion. The author analyzes the provisions of legal acts regarding the definition of the concept of discretionary powers. The author establishes that discretionary powers have clear limits specified in the legislation.