Annotation. The article examines problematic issues related to the use of preventive measures in the form of detention in criminal cases and the experience of foreign countries in this area. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding detention and its decisions are analyzed in the context of legal norms and standards related to human rights. Particular attention is paid to the experience of countries where alternative preventive measures are implemented in order to improve the justice system and ensure human rights, which can be effective and do not limit human rights to such a severe degree as detention.
In addition, issues related to unsubstantiated detention decisions, excessively long proceedings and the need to increase the transparency of this process are considered.
The importance of observing human rights during the application of a measure in the form of detention, which is the most severe and restrictive measure, is particularly emphasized, therefore its application must be justified and fair.
1. Nazarov V.V. Aktualni problemi zastosuvannya zapobizhnogo zahodu u viglyadi vzyattya pid vartu. YUridichnij visnik, 2010. № 4. P. 111–115. [in Ukrainian].
2. Pro zatverdzhennya Instrukciyi pro zahodi shhodo dotrimannya vimog zakonodavstva pri zatrimanni bez uhvali slidchogo suddi, sudu osib, pidozryuvanih u vchinenni zlochinu, ta obranni stosovno pidozryuvanih zapobizhnogo zahodu – trimannya pid vartoyu pid chas dosudovogo rozsliduvannya: nakaz Ministerstva vnutrishnih sprav ta Ministerstva yusticiyi Ukrayini vid 01 zhovtnya 2018 r. № 806/3105/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1190-18#n7 (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
3. Kriminalnij procesualnij kodeks Ukrayini: Kodeks Ukrayini vid 13 kvitnya 2012 r. № 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
4. Baganec O. Stan dotrimannya konstitucijnih prav gromadyan pid chas dosudovogo rozsliduvannya u 2019 roci. URL: https://resonance.ua/stan-dotrimannya-konstituciynikh-prav/ (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
5. Tishhenko O. I. Trimannya pid vartoyu: okremi pitannya pravozastosovnih realij. Naukovij visnik Uzhgorodskogo nacionalnogo universitetu. Seriya Pravo, 2014. Vip. 27. Tom 3. P. 135–138. [in Ukrainian].
6. Konvenciya pro zahist prav lyudini i osnovopolozhnih svobod (z protokolami) vid 04 listopada 1950 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
7. Sprava «Korban proti Ukrayini» Zayava № 26744/16. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/Korban_vs_Ukraine.pdf (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
8. Sprava «Nevmerzhickij proti Ukrayini» Zayava № 54825/00. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-1... OF%20NEVMERZHITSKY%20v.%20UKRAINE%20-%20%5BUkrainian%20Translation%5D% 20summary%20by%20the%20Lviv%20Laboratory%20of%20Human%20Rights.pdf&logEvent=False (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
9. Sprava «Taran proti Ukrayini» Zayava № 31898/06. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/SOO00603 (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
10. Bail Reform Act of 1984. URL: https://www.rip.uscourts.gov/sites/rip/files/bailreformact.pdf (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in English].
11. Konstituciya Spoluchenih SHtativ Ameriki. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20111106024013/http://www.litopys.lviv.ua/ka... (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in Ukrainian].
12. Bail Act 1976. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/63 (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in English].
13. Straffeprosessloven. URL: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1981-05-22-25 (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in English].
14. Criminal Code. URL: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-4.html#docCont (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in English].
15. Wetboek van Strafvordering. URL: https://www.omgevingsweb.nl/wetgeving/wetboek-van-strafrecht/eerste-boek... (data zvernennya: 08.11.2023). [in English].