Measures to ensure criminal proceedings: legal analysis

2022;
: 174-178

Ortinski V. "Measures to ensure criminal proceedings: legal analysis."
https://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-9-number-234-2...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute for Law, Psychology, and Innovative Education

The article considers the system of measures to ensure criminal proceedings under the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. A critical analysis of scientific positions on the concept of measures to ensure criminal conduct, as well as their features.

The Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is a completely new, modern, democratic instrument aimed at implementing judicial reform in Ukraine. The current CPC has consolidated a number of institutions that have significantly changed the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine.

It is important to note that the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine in 2012 are based on the Convention on Criminal Justice Reform of Ukraine, approved by the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine and approved by Presidential Decree of April 8, 2008 № 311, the provisions of the Convention on Human Rights freedoms, the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights, was taken the experience of countries such as Italy, France, Poland, Bulgaria, Moldova, Lithuania, Latvia, USA and others.

Measures to ensure criminal conduct are given considerable attention both in the legislature and in the practical implementation of the law, as they are based on human rights.

  1. Rozhnova V.V., Savytskyi D.O., Koniushenko Ya.Iu. (2012). Kurs lektsii z kryminalnoho protsesu za novym Kryminalnym protsesualnym kodeksom Ukrainy (zahalna chastyna).  K. : Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav,  398 p.
  2. Kpyminalnyi ppotsec : [navchalnyi poci6nyk y pytanniax i vidpovidiax] (2012). / L.D. Udalova, B.B. Pozhnova, D.O. Cavytskyi, O.Iu. Xa6lo.  3-e vyd., pepepo6. i dop.  K. : Bydavets,  275 p.
  3. «Zahalni pravyla zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia». O.M. Bondarenko. URL:http://lsej.org.ua/2_2014/28.pdf (data zvernennia: 09.05.2022)
  4. Mykolenko O.M. (2014). Kpytepiï klacyfikatsiï zaxodiv za6ezpechennia kpyminalnoho ppovadzhennia ta ïx cpivvidnoshennia z zaxodamy kpyminalnoho ppotsecyalnoho ppymycy. Ppavova depzhava.  Byp. 17.  P. 81-84. URL:nttp://dspace.onu.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/123456789/6408/1/81-84.pdf. (data zvernennia: 09.05.2022)
  5. Nazarov V.V. (2013). Zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Yevropeiski perspektyvy.  № 3.  P. 102-106.10. URL:http://mashika.com.ua  (data zvernennia: 09.05.2022)
  6. Kappenko M.I., Omelchyk K.I. (2013). Zaxody za6ezpechennia kpyminalnoho ppovadzhennia.  Yupydychna nayka.  № 11.  P. 81–89.
  7. Smokov S. M. Vydy obmezhen konstytutsiinykh prav hromadian u novomu kryminalnomu protsesualnomu kodeksi Ukrainy. URL:http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/ejournals/FP/2012-2/12ccmpku.pdf (data zvernennia: 09.05.2022)
  8. Kydyn F. M. (1985). Ppynyzhdenye v yholovnom cydoppoyzvodctve. Kpacnoiapck : yzd-vo Kpacnoiapckoho yn-ta,  136 p.
  9. Bandypka O.M. (2002). Opepatyvno-pozshykova diialnict : Chactyna I : [pidpychnyk] X. : Byd-vo Nats. yn-ty. vnytp.cppav,  P. 219–220.