Abstract. The author of the article carried out a comprehensive understanding of the legal policy in the field of business protection as a key task of the development of statehood in the conditions of war, crisis factors, economic shocks, environmental challenges, administrative barriers and corruption risks. Fragmentation of legal, social and economic approaches cause additional problems and gaps in the field of business protection.
It was established that the interaction between the state and business largely depends on fiscal policy, in particular tax regulation, subsidies, grants and tax benefits. Clear, predictable and fair taxation rules are necessary to stimulate economic activity. An inconsistent or excessively burdensome tax system can slow down business development and contribute to its shadowing.
It is reasoned that in democratic states market regulation is necessary to prevent monopolization, protect consumer rights and ensure environmental standards. At the same time, excessive regulation can create barriers to the development of entrepreneurship, so the balance between regulations and freedom of entrepreneurial activity is an important constant.
It was emphasized that the investment sphere is of significant importance for business development, as it provides the necessary financial resources for expanding production, introducing innovations and modernizing infrastructure.
A complex of factors that have the potential to form a paradigm of business protection is proposed: formation of a normative and legal framework for the regulation of entrepreneurial activity; balanced financial policy of the state; guarantees of ensuring legal regulation based on the autonomy of entrepreneurial activity, including the proper functioning of judicial institutions; creation of trusting relations between the state and business.
The article summarizes that the problem of business development should be treated comprehensively, with a thorough analysis of foreseeable threats and possible positives. The requested change is an ideological approach to the complexity of legal policy, which takes into account normative, ideological, institutional, economic, law-enforcement criteria and should provide for a long-term vector of the development of statehood.
1. Fathoni S., Sr, Y., Soerjatisnanta H. (2024) Striking a Balance: Streamlining Environmental Licensing for Business Growth and Environmental Protection in Indonesia. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, No 7 (6). P. 240-248. [In English]
2. Top 15 countries by GDP in 2024 (2024). Retrieved from: https://globalpeoservices.com/top-15-countries-by-gdp-in-2024/ (Accessed: 22.09.2024). [In English]
3. WJP Rule of Law Index. (2023). Retrieved from: https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/global/2023/Ukraine/Ci... (Accessed: 22.09.2024). [In English]
4. Vysnovok shchodo zmin do zakonodavchykh aktiv, yaki rehuliuiut status Verkhovnoho Sudu ta orhaniv suddivskoho vriaduvannia (2019): Vysnovok No 969/2019 pryiniato Venetsianskoiu komisiieiu na yii 121-mu plenarnomu zasidanni [Opinion on amendments to the legislative acts regulating the status of the Supreme Court and judicial governance bodies: Opinion No. 969/2019 adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st plenary session] Retrieved from: https://www.echr.com.ua/document/visnovok-shhodo-zmin-do-zakonodavchix-aktiv-yaki-regulyuyut-status-verxovnogo-sudu-ta-organiv-suddivskogo-vryaduvannya/ (Accessed: 22.09.2024). [In Ukrainian].
5. Kravchenko O. (2023) International Experience of Regulatory and Legal Protection of Commercial Business Secrets. Philosophy, Economics and Law Review. Vol. 3, no. 1. P. 285-295 [In English]
6. Minekonomiky, Tinova ekonomika [Shadow economy] (2024). Retrieved from: https://me.gov.ua/?lang=uk-UA (Accessed: 28.09.2024). [In Ukrainian].
7. Mishchuk H., Bilan S., Yurchyk H, Akimova L. (2020) Vplyv tinovoi ekonomiky na sotsialnu bezpeku: dosvid Ukrainy. [The impact of the shadow economy on social security: the experience of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta sotsiolohiia. Shchetsin : Tsentr sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhen. vyp. 13, No 2, P. 289-303. [The Impact of the Shadow Economy on Social Security: The Experience of Ukraine Economics and Sociology. Szczecin: Center for Sociological Research] [In Ukrainian].
8. Ginevicius R., Kliestik T., Stasiukynas A., Suhajda, K. (2020) The Impact of National Economic Development on the Shadow Economy. Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 12(3), P. 39–55. [In English]
9. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified State Register of Court Decisions] (2021), Postanova VS Ukrainy vid 27 sichnia 2021 roku u spravi No 910/17876/19 [Unified State Register of Court Decisions, Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94643002 (Accessed: 28.09.2024). [In Ukrainian].
10. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified State Register of Court Decisions] (2019), Postanova VS Ukrainy vid 2 lypnia 2019 roku u spravi No 910/15484/17 [Unified State Register of Court Decisions, Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83000592 (Accessed: 22.09.2024). [In Ukrainian].
11. Nguyen T.A.N., Luong T.T.H. (2020) Corruption, Shadow Economy and Economic Growth: Evidence from Emerging and Developing Asian Economies, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, P. 85-94. [In English]
12. Singapore International Commercial Court (2024) Retrieved from: https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/singapore-international-commercial-court (Accessed: 28.09.2024). [In English]
13. Gu W., Yi T. (2024) Exploring the Potential for Establishing an International Commercial Court in Hong Kong: A New Momentum for Developing this Legal Hub? Asian Dispute Review. No 26(1), P. 19-28. [In English]
14. Commercial Court (2024) Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/commercial-court (Accessed: 28.09.2024). [In English]