The article is devoted to the issues of defining the concept and substantive essence of the European Union acquis. The study is grounded in the fact that despite a long history of research in this area, the acquis still does not have an interpretation that would fully reveal the nature of this phenomenon. This follows from the absence of a statutory definition of the acquis in European legislation, which has contributed to the development of various theories on the nature of the acquis.
Approaches to understanding the acquis as a set of common rights and obligations, the EU legal system, a set of legal acts and policy instruments, legal order or principle are analyzed. It is concluded that most of the existing definitions create a certain impression of the acquis but do not allow to comprehend the essence of this phenomenon fully.
The author proposes a view of the acquis as a system of legal means. This approach allows to cover all the various instruments designed to achieve legal objectives within the EU and to emphasize the links between different elements of this system and their mutual influence. Given the EU’s recognition of the priority of the acquis over any national norms, it is clarified that this system of legal means is supranational. Taking into account that the acquis provides for common rights and obligations of the Member States, the article emphasizes that the acquis is the basis for the formation of the internal legal order in the Community. In light of the study, the author proposes a new definition of the EU acquis as a supranational system of legal means which defines common rights and obligations of the Member States and forms a single internal legal order of the European Union.
1. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony (2014) [Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text (Accessed: 14.11.2024). [In Ukrainian].
2. Petrov, R. (2006). The dynamic nature of the acquis communautaire in EU external relations. Revue Européenne de Droit Public. No. 18(2). P. 741–771.
3. Pro Zahalnoderzhavnu prohramu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (2004, March 18) No. 629-IV [On the National Program of Adaptation of Ukrainian Legislation to the Legislation of the European Union]. VVR. 2004. No. 29. 367 p. [In Ukrainian].
4. Propozytsii Prezydenta do Zakonu “Pro Zahalnoderzhavnu prohramu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu” (2023, December 25) No. 3581 [President’s Proposals to the Law “On the National Program of Adaptation of Ukrainian Legislation to the Legislation of the European Union”]. Retrieved from: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=15183 (Accessed: 14.11.2024). [In Ukrainian].
5. Pro Kontseptsiiu Zahalnoderzhavnoi prohramy adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (2002, November 21) No. 228-IV [On the Concept of the National Program of Adaptation of Ukrainian Legislation to the Legislation of the European Union]. VVR. 2003. No. 3. P. 12. [In Ukrainian].
6. Statement by M. Willy Brandt Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany / The Summit Conference at the Hague. Statements made by the Heads of State or Government on 2 December 1969. Bulletin of the European Communities. 1970. No. 2. Р. 35–43.
7. Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal. Vol. 100(8). P. 2403–2483.
8. European Comission. Glossary: Acquis. URL: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/glossa... (Accessed: 14.11.2024).
9. Magen, А. (2007). Transformative Engagement Through Law: The Acquis Communautaire as an Instrument of EU External Influence. European Journal of Law Reform. No. 9(3). P. 361–392.
10. Smyrnova, K. К. (2011). Spivvidnoshennia acquis communautaire ta dzherel prava Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Correlation of the acquis communautaire and sources of European Union law]. Porivnialno-pravovi doslidzhennia. Kyiv: In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. No. 1. P. 121–126. [In Ukrainian].
11. Nazarenko, O., Kharchenko, N. (2023). Pravoporiadok yak meta i rezultat pravovoho rehuliuvannia v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Legal order as a goal and result of legal regulation under martial law]. Filosofski ta metodolohichni problemy prava. № 1. P. 130–140. [In Ukrainian].
12. Judgment of the CJEU of 15 July 1964 in case 6-64, Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L., ECLI:EU:C:1964:66.
13. Mortelmans, K. (1996). Community Law: More than a Functional Area of Law, Less than a Legal System. Legal Issues of European Integration. No. 23(1). P. 23–49. [In Ukrainian].
14. Öberg, M.-L. (2020). Internal Market Acquis as a Tool in EU External Relations: From Integration to Disintegration. Legal Issues of Economic Integration. No. 47(2). P. 151–177. [In Ukrainian].
15. Vavrynchuk, A. P. (2023). Znachennia acquis communautaire dlia formuvannia suchasnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy [The importance of the acquis communautaire for the formation of modern Ukrainian legislation]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. No. 12. P. 471–474. [In Ukrainian].
16. Riaboshapchenko, A. (2014). Pryntsyp acquis communautaire: stanovlennia ta znachennia pry pidhotovtsi vstupu Avstriiskoi Respubliky do Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [The Principle of the Acquis Communautaire: Formation and Significance in the Preparation of the Accession of the Republic of Austria to the European Union]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. No. 2. P. 291–295. [In Ukrainian].
17. Shtefan, A. S. (2022). Pryntsypy avtorskoho prava [Principles of copyright]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. No. 1. P. 129–138. [In Ukrainian].
18. Petrov, R. A. (2012). Evoliutsiia poniattia “acquis communautaire” v pravi Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Evolution of the concept of “acquis communautaire” in the law of the European Union]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. No. 4. P. 154–157. [In Ukrainian].
19. Hetmantseva, N., Mytrytska, H. (2021). Pravovi zasoby v mekhanizmi pravovoho rehuliuvannia suspilnykh vidnosyn u sferi naimanoi pratsi [Legal means in the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations in the field of hired labor]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. No. 3. P. 132–140. [In Ukrainian].
20. Commission opinion of 23 may 1979 on the application for accession to the European Communities by the Hellenic Republic. OJL 291, 19.11.1979. P. 3–3. [In Ukrainian].
21. Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 – A. Declarations concerning provisions of the Treaties – 17. Declaration concerning primacy. Document 12008E/AFI/DCL/17. OJC 115, 9.5.2008, P. 344–344. [In Ukrainian].