Еquality, dignity and proportionality as human rights principles

2017;
: pp. 521-530

I. Zabokrytskyy «Equality, dignity and proportionalityas human rights principles» http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-1-number-865-14...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

Еquality, dignity and proportionality as the principles of human rightsare considered. Scientific approaches of their implementation in constitutional and legal practice are studied. Foreign experience in implementing these principles is analyzed.

 

1. Human Rights Principles. United Nations Population Fund. Available at: http://www. unfpa. org/resources/human-rights-principles. Retrieved 25-01-2015.
2. What are human rights? United Nations Human Rights, office of the High Commissioner Available at: http://www. ohchr. org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights. aspx Retrieved 25-01-2015.
3. Why the Human Dignity Trust? Available at: http://www. humandignitytrust. org/pages/OUR%20WORK/ Why%20Human%20Dignity Retrieved 25-01-2015.
4. Kontseptsiya zaborony nenalezhnoho povodzhennya z lyudynoyu ta yiyi evolyutsiya v diyal’nosti rady Yevropy [The concept of prohibition of ill-treatment of man and its evolution in the Council of Europe]: avtoref. dys... kand. yuryd. Nauk. E. V. Shyshkina. Kyyiv: B. v., 2009. 20 p.
5. Prava i svobody lyudyny i hromadyanyna v Ukrayini (doktryna Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny i Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny) [The rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine (the doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine)]: navchal’nyy posibnyk / zvernennya do chytachiv Holovina A. S. Holovy Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny (VII.2010-VII.2013 roky); vst. Slovo i zah. red. prof. Martynenka P. F., Kampa V. M. K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2013. 376 p.
6. Paolo G. Carozza. Human dignity in constitutional adjudication. Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (2011). Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 459-473.https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931214.00034
7. Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany 1949 (rev. 2012). Available at: https://www. constituteproject. org/ constitution/German_Federal_Republic_2012? lang=en.
8. Tsyvil’nyy Kodeks Ukrayiny [Civil Code of Ukraine] vid 16 sichnya 2013 r. Available at: http://zakon5. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/435- 15/print1453746771339698.
9. Matthias Mahlmann. Human dignity and autonomy in modern constitutional orders. Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.370–396.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0020
10. Bernhard Schhlink. Proportionality (1). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, p.719.
11. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine] vid 1996 r. Available at: http://zakon4. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/254 %D0 %BA/96-%D0 %B2 %D1 %80.
12. The margin of appreciation (proportionality principle). Council of Europe. Available at: https://www. coe. int/t/dghl/cooperation/lisbonnetwork/themis/echr/paper2_en. asp Retrieved 25-01-2015.
13. Sunday Times v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 26.04.1979. Available at: https://www. article19. org/resources. php/resource/3101/en/echr:-the-sunday-times-v.-the-united-kingdom.
14. Bernhard Schhlink. Proportionality (1). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.718-737.
15. Aharon Barak. Proportionality (2). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.738-755.
16. Vasyl’chenko O. P. Pryntsyp rivnosti prav i svobod lyudyny i hromadyanyna v konstytutsiynomu pravi Ukrayiny: doktrynal’ni ta prykladni aspect. [principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the constitutional law of Ukraine, doctrinal and practical aspects.] Dysertatsiya na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya doktora yurydychnykh nauk za spetsial’nistyu 12.00.02 – konstytutsiyne pravo; munitsypal’ne pravo. – Kyyivs’kyy natsional’nyy universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – Kyyiv, 2015, 467 p.
17. Suffrage. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Suffrage Retrieved 30-01-2015.
18. The Long Way to Women’s Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology. Available at: http://history-switzerland. geschichte-schweiz. ch/chronology-womens-right-vote-switzerland. html Retrieved 30-01-2015. 19. Saudi voters elect 20 women candidates for the first time. Available at: http://www. foxnews. com/world/2015/12/13/initial-results-show-3-saudi-women-have-been-elected-to-government-posts-for. html Retrieved 30-01-2015.
20. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U. S. 483 (1954). Available at: http://caselaw. findlaw. com/us-supreme-court/347/483. html Retrieved 30-01-2015.
21. Discrimination in the United States. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Discrimination_in_the_United_States Retrieved 30-01-2015.
22. Zakon Ukrayiny “Pro vnesennya zminy do Kodeksu zakoniv pro pratsyu Ukrayiny shchodo harmonizatsiyi zakonodavstva u sferi zapobihannya ta protydiyi dyskryminatsiyi z pravom Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu” [“On Amendments to the Labor Code of Ukraine concerning the harmonization of legislation in the sphere of combating discrimination European Union law”] (Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady (VVR), 2015, No 49-50, st.467). Available at: http://zakon4. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/785-19.
23. 141. Kate O’Regan, Nick Friedman. Equality. Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (2011). Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 473–503.
24. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265 (1978). Available at: http://caselaw. lp. findlaw. com/scripts/getcase. pl? navby=CASE&court=US&vol=438&page=265. 25. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U. S. 306 (2003). Available at: http://caselaw. lp. findlaw. com/scripts/ getcase. pl? navby=CASE&court=US&vol=539&page=306.