Рівність, гідність та пропорційність як принципи прав людини

1. Human Rights Principles. United Nations Population Fund. Available at: http://www. unfpa. org/resources/human-rights-principles. Retrieved 25-01-2015.
2. What are human rights? United Nations Human Rights, office of the High Commissioner Available at: http://www. ohchr. org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights. aspx Retrieved 25-01-2015.
3. Why the Human Dignity Trust? Available at: http://www. humandignitytrust. org/pages/OUR%20WORK/ Why%20Human%20Dignity Retrieved 25-01-2015.
4. Kontseptsiya zaborony nenalezhnoho povodzhennya z lyudynoyu ta yiyi evolyutsiya v diyal’nosti rady Yevropy [The concept of prohibition of ill-treatment of man and its evolution in the Council of Europe]: avtoref. dys... kand. yuryd. Nauk. E. V. Shyshkina. Kyyiv: B. v., 2009. 20 p.
5. Prava i svobody lyudyny i hromadyanyna v Ukrayini (doktryna Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny i Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny) [The rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine (the doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine)]: navchal’nyy posibnyk / zvernennya do chytachiv Holovina A. S. Holovy Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny (VII.2010-VII.2013 roky); vst. Slovo i zah. red. prof. Martynenka P. F., Kampa V. M. K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2013. 376 p.
6. Paolo G. Carozza. Human dignity in constitutional adjudication. Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (2011). Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 459-473.
7. Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany 1949 (rev. 2012). Available at: https://www. constituteproject. org/ constitution/German_Federal_Republic_2012? lang=en.
8. Tsyvil’nyy Kodeks Ukrayiny [Civil Code of Ukraine] vid 16 sichnya 2013 r. Available at: http://zakon5. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/435- 15/print1453746771339698.
9. Matthias Mahlmann. Human dignity and autonomy in modern constitutional orders. Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.370–396.
10. Bernhard Schhlink. Proportionality (1). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, p.719.
11. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine] vid 1996 r. Available at: http://zakon4. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/254 %D0 %BA/96-%D0 %B2 %D1 %80.
12. The margin of appreciation (proportionality principle). Council of Europe. Available at: https://www. coe. int/t/dghl/cooperation/lisbonnetwork/themis/echr/paper2_en. asp Retrieved 25-01-2015.
13. Sunday Times v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 26.04.1979. Available at: https://www. article19. org/resources. php/resource/3101/en/echr:-the-sunday-times-v.-the-united-kingdom.
14. Bernhard Schhlink. Proportionality (1). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.718-737.
15. Aharon Barak. Proportionality (2). Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press, pp.738-755.
16. Vasyl’chenko O. P. Pryntsyp rivnosti prav i svobod lyudyny i hromadyanyna v konstytutsiynomu pravi Ukrayiny: doktrynal’ni ta prykladni aspect. [principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the constitutional law of Ukraine, doctrinal and practical aspects.] Dysertatsiya na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya doktora yurydychnykh nauk za spetsial’nistyu 12.00.02 – konstytutsiyne pravo; munitsypal’ne pravo. – Kyyivs’kyy natsional’nyy universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – Kyyiv, 2015, 467 p.
17. Suffrage. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Suffrage Retrieved 30-01-2015.
18. The Long Way to Women’s Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology. Available at: http://history-switzerland. geschichte-schweiz. ch/chronology-womens-right-vote-switzerland. html Retrieved 30-01-2015. 19. Saudi voters elect 20 women candidates for the first time. Available at: http://www. foxnews. com/world/2015/12/13/initial-results-show-3-saudi-women-have-been-elected-to-government-posts-for. html Retrieved 30-01-2015.
20. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U. S. 483 (1954). Available at: http://caselaw. findlaw. com/us-supreme-court/347/483. html Retrieved 30-01-2015.
21. Discrimination in the United States. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Discrimination_in_the_United_States Retrieved 30-01-2015.
22. Zakon Ukrayiny “Pro vnesennya zminy do Kodeksu zakoniv pro pratsyu Ukrayiny shchodo harmonizatsiyi zakonodavstva u sferi zapobihannya ta protydiyi dyskryminatsiyi z pravom Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu” [“On Amendments to the Labor Code of Ukraine concerning the harmonization of legislation in the sphere of combating discrimination European Union law”] (Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady (VVR), 2015, No 49-50, st.467). Available at: http://zakon4. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/785-19.
23. 141. Kate O’Regan, Nick Friedman. Equality. Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (2011). Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham, U. K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 473–503.
24. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265 (1978). Available at: http://caselaw. lp. findlaw. com/scripts/getcase. pl? navby=CASE&court=US&vol=438&page=265. 25. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U. S. 306 (2003). Available at: http://caselaw. lp. findlaw. com/scripts/ getcase. pl? navby=CASE&court=US&vol=539&page=306.