Problems of application of the home arrest as a previous event and a proceedial primary action in criminal proceedings

2019;
: 180-184

Huzela M. "Problems of application of the home arrest as a previous event
and a proceedial primary action in criminal proceedings"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-6-number-22-201...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article is devoted to the problem of the use of domestic arrest as a preventive measure and the enforcement of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings. On the basis of the research of the scientific positions of individual processologists on the use of domestic arrest, it was concluded that home arrest is a progressive preventive measure, which in its essence is a complex of restrictions and prohibitions imposed on an accused (suspect), appointed in accordance with the decision of the investigating judge or court, connected with its full or partial isolation within the limits of the housing, aimed at achieving the goal of this preventive measure, implemented and controlled by the authorized bodies. However, the mechanism of house arrest is not perfect. Therefore, he needs to improve and create conditions for the use of domestic arrest to perform his procedural function at an appropriate level.

1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine] vid 28 chervnia 1996 roku. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254k/96-vr. 2. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13 kvitnia 2012 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17. 3. Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro poriadok zastosuvannia elektronnykh zasobiv kontroliu [On approval of the Regulations on the procedure for the use of electronic controls]: nakaz MVS Ukrainy vid 8 chervnia 2017 r. № 480 URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0860-17. 4. Bilous O. V. Okremi pytannia zastosuvannia domashnoho areshtu u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Separate issues of house arrest in criminal proceedings]. Kyiv: Yurydychna nauka, 2014. № 10. P. 179–180. 5. Kovalenko V. V. Kryminalnyi protses [Criminal process] : [pidruchnyk] / za zah. red. V. V. Kovalenka, L. D. Udalovoi, D. P. Pysmennoho. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2013. 544 p. 6. Slobodian R. V. Domashnii aresht yak alternatyva trymanniu pid vartoiu u svitli proektu Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Home arrest as an alternative to detention in light of the draft Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy reformuvannia kryminalno-protsesualnoho zakonodavstva y udoskonalennia diialnosti sudovykh i pravookhoronnykh orhaniv Ukrainy: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Luhansk, 20 kvit. 2012 p.). Luhansk : RVV LDUVS im. E. O. Didorenka, 2012. P. 220–223. 7. Instruktsiia pro poriadok vykonannia orhanamy Natsionalnoi politsii ukhval slidchoho suddi, sudu pro obrannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi domashnoho areshtu ta pro zminu ranishe obranoho zapobizhnoho zakhodu na zapobizhnyi zakhid u vyhliadi domashnoho areshtu [Instruction on the procedure for the execution of the decisions of the National Police by the investigating judge, the court about the choice of a preventive measure in the form of a house arrest and the change of the previously chosen preventive measure for a preventive measure in the form of a house arrest] : Nakaz Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy vid 13.07.2016 roku № 654. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1087-16. 8. Rishennia YeSPL u spravi “Vittorio i Luidzhy Manchyni proty Italii”. [ECtHR judgment in Vittorio & Luigi Mancini v. Italy]. URL: www.rrpoi.narod.ru/echr/.../vittorio_and_luigi_mancini.htm.